分析国际地质科学协会对 ITRF2020 的贡献

IF 3.9 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Geodesy Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1
Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Laurent Métivier, Xavier Collilieux, Kevin Gobron, Kristel Chanard
{"title":"分析国际地质科学协会对 ITRF2020 的贡献","authors":"Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Laurent Métivier, Xavier Collilieux, Kevin Gobron, Kristel Chanard","doi":"10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As its contribution to the latest release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame, ITRF2020, the International GNSS Service (IGS) provided a 27-year-long series of daily “repro3” terrestrial frame solutions obtained by combining reprocessed solutions from ten Analysis Centers. This contribution represents an improvement over the previous contribution to ITRF2014, not only by the inclusion of more stations with longer and more complete position time series, but also by a general reduction in random and systematic errors. The IGS contribution to ITRF2020 also provided, for the first time, an independent estimate of the terrestrial scale based on the calibration of the Galileo satellite antennas. Despite the various observed improvements, the repro3 station position time series remain affected by a variety of random and systematic errors. This includes spurious periodic variations in several frequency bands, originating mostly from orbit and tide modeling errors, on top of a combination of white and flicker noise, whose origins remain to be precisely understood. These various components should carefully be accounted for when modeling GNSS station position time series and interpreting them in terms of Earth’s surface deformation. The Galileo-based scale of the repro3 solutions is found to be significantly offset (by <span>\\(+\\)</span>4.3 mm at epoch 2015.0) and drifting (by <span>\\(+\\)</span>0.11 mm/year) from the SLR/VLBI-based scale of ITRF2020. The reasons for this offset and drift remain to be uncovered.</p>","PeriodicalId":54822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geodesy","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the IGS contribution to ITRF2020\",\"authors\":\"Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Laurent Métivier, Xavier Collilieux, Kevin Gobron, Kristel Chanard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As its contribution to the latest release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame, ITRF2020, the International GNSS Service (IGS) provided a 27-year-long series of daily “repro3” terrestrial frame solutions obtained by combining reprocessed solutions from ten Analysis Centers. This contribution represents an improvement over the previous contribution to ITRF2014, not only by the inclusion of more stations with longer and more complete position time series, but also by a general reduction in random and systematic errors. The IGS contribution to ITRF2020 also provided, for the first time, an independent estimate of the terrestrial scale based on the calibration of the Galileo satellite antennas. Despite the various observed improvements, the repro3 station position time series remain affected by a variety of random and systematic errors. This includes spurious periodic variations in several frequency bands, originating mostly from orbit and tide modeling errors, on top of a combination of white and flicker noise, whose origins remain to be precisely understood. These various components should carefully be accounted for when modeling GNSS station position time series and interpreting them in terms of Earth’s surface deformation. The Galileo-based scale of the repro3 solutions is found to be significantly offset (by <span>\\\\(+\\\\)</span>4.3 mm at epoch 2015.0) and drifting (by <span>\\\\(+\\\\)</span>0.11 mm/year) from the SLR/VLBI-based scale of ITRF2020. The reasons for this offset and drift remain to be uncovered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为对最新发布的国际地面参考框架ITRF2020的贡献,国际全球导航卫星系统服务组织(IGS)提供了一系列长达27年的每日 "repro3 "地面框架解决方案,这些解决方案是将十个分析中心的再处理解决方案结合在一起获得的。与之前向 ITRF2014 提供的数据相比,此次提供的数据有所改进,不仅纳入了更多具有更长、更完整位置时间序列的台站,还普遍减少了随机误差和系统误差。IGS 对 ITRF2020 的贡献还首次提供了基于伽利略卫星天线校准的陆地尺度独立估算。尽管观测到了各种改进,但重现3台站位置时间序列仍受到各种随机和系统误差的影响。这包括几个频段的虚假周期性变化,主要源于轨道和潮汐建模误差,以及白噪声和闪烁噪声的组合,其来源仍有待精确了解。在对全球导航卫星系统台站位置时间序列建模并根据地球表面变形对其进行解释时,应仔细考虑这些不同的成分。研究发现,基于伽利略的重现3解决方案的尺度与基于SLR/VLBI的ITRF2020尺度相比,有明显的偏移(在2015.0历元偏移4.3毫米)和漂移(每年偏移0.11毫米)。这种偏移和漂移的原因仍有待揭示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the IGS contribution to ITRF2020

As its contribution to the latest release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame, ITRF2020, the International GNSS Service (IGS) provided a 27-year-long series of daily “repro3” terrestrial frame solutions obtained by combining reprocessed solutions from ten Analysis Centers. This contribution represents an improvement over the previous contribution to ITRF2014, not only by the inclusion of more stations with longer and more complete position time series, but also by a general reduction in random and systematic errors. The IGS contribution to ITRF2020 also provided, for the first time, an independent estimate of the terrestrial scale based on the calibration of the Galileo satellite antennas. Despite the various observed improvements, the repro3 station position time series remain affected by a variety of random and systematic errors. This includes spurious periodic variations in several frequency bands, originating mostly from orbit and tide modeling errors, on top of a combination of white and flicker noise, whose origins remain to be precisely understood. These various components should carefully be accounted for when modeling GNSS station position time series and interpreting them in terms of Earth’s surface deformation. The Galileo-based scale of the repro3 solutions is found to be significantly offset (by \(+\)4.3 mm at epoch 2015.0) and drifting (by \(+\)0.11 mm/year) from the SLR/VLBI-based scale of ITRF2020. The reasons for this offset and drift remain to be uncovered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geodesy
Journal of Geodesy 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geodesy is an international journal concerned with the study of scientific problems of geodesy and related interdisciplinary sciences. Peer-reviewed papers are published on theoretical or modeling studies, and on results of experiments and interpretations. Besides original research papers, the journal includes commissioned review papers on topical subjects and special issues arising from chosen scientific symposia or workshops. The journal covers the whole range of geodetic science and reports on theoretical and applied studies in research areas such as: -Positioning -Reference frame -Geodetic networks -Modeling and quality control -Space geodesy -Remote sensing -Gravity fields -Geodynamics
期刊最新文献
Modified Bayesian method for simultaneously imaging fault geometry and slip distribution with reduced uncertainty, applied to 2017 Mw 7.3 Sarpol-e Zahab (Iran) earthquake Global 3D ionospheric shape function modeling with kriging Spherical radial basis functions model: approximating an integral functional of an isotropic Gaussian random field Capture of coseismic velocity waveform using GNSS raw Doppler and carrier phase data for enhancing shaking intensity estimation Derivation of the Sagnac (Earth-rotation) correction and analysis of its accuracy for GNSS applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1