Himangshu Paul, T. C. Sunilkumar, Vineet K. Gahalaut, D. Srinagesh, M. Shekar
{"title":"VP/VS 比率在印度西海岸长持续时间地震群定位中的意义","authors":"Himangshu Paul, T. C. Sunilkumar, Vineet K. Gahalaut, D. Srinagesh, M. Shekar","doi":"10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The earthquake swarm in Palghar, western India, is a natural laboratory to understand long-duration seismogenesis. However, it requires an accurate estimation of the key parameters, such as earthquake locations and the velocity model of the region. Two separate studies performed by two organisations in India, the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) and the National Center for Seismology (NCS) reported significantly differing results from the first 8–12 months of earthquake monitoring in Palghar. CSIR-NGRI reported the depth of earthquakes in the range of 4–15 km, whereas NCS reported a much shallower depth down to 7 km only. We investigate the reason for this depth discrepancy by analysing datasets from the networks of both these organisations. We find that no available velocity models are able to reconcile the depth difference between the two datasets. Selection criteria generally adopted to determine a good velocity model, such as travel-time residuals and location errors, also failed to identify a suitable velocity model. Several synthetic tests helped us to identify that the network geometry and source-station separation are contributing factors to the observed depth difference. However, the main reason for the discrepancy was found to be inconsistent velocity models used for location at both networks. The main objective of our work is to estimate a velocity model which minimises the depth discrepancy between both datasets. In this regard, we synthetically generated hundreds of models with different V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, followed by a grid search of V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, which harmonises the location from the two datasets. The best model consists of a V<sub>P</sub> lying between 5.55–5.85 km/s and a V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio between 1.77–1.81. For this velocity model, there is a greater overlap of the hypocentral clouds from both networks, and about 80% of the earthquakes of the CSIR-NGRI network were located within depths ≤ 7 km. We find that location errors vary seasonally, which is also related to the V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> of the crust. Since earlier studies have also found a strong correspondence between rainfall and seismicity in this region, we infer that the high V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio might have been caused by the rainfall saturation of cracks in the Palghar seismicity zone.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of VP/VS ratio in locating earthquakes of a long-duration swarm in the western coast of India\",\"authors\":\"Himangshu Paul, T. C. Sunilkumar, Vineet K. Gahalaut, D. Srinagesh, M. Shekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The earthquake swarm in Palghar, western India, is a natural laboratory to understand long-duration seismogenesis. However, it requires an accurate estimation of the key parameters, such as earthquake locations and the velocity model of the region. Two separate studies performed by two organisations in India, the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) and the National Center for Seismology (NCS) reported significantly differing results from the first 8–12 months of earthquake monitoring in Palghar. CSIR-NGRI reported the depth of earthquakes in the range of 4–15 km, whereas NCS reported a much shallower depth down to 7 km only. We investigate the reason for this depth discrepancy by analysing datasets from the networks of both these organisations. We find that no available velocity models are able to reconcile the depth difference between the two datasets. Selection criteria generally adopted to determine a good velocity model, such as travel-time residuals and location errors, also failed to identify a suitable velocity model. Several synthetic tests helped us to identify that the network geometry and source-station separation are contributing factors to the observed depth difference. However, the main reason for the discrepancy was found to be inconsistent velocity models used for location at both networks. The main objective of our work is to estimate a velocity model which minimises the depth discrepancy between both datasets. In this regard, we synthetically generated hundreds of models with different V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, followed by a grid search of V<sub>P</sub> and V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratios, which harmonises the location from the two datasets. The best model consists of a V<sub>P</sub> lying between 5.55–5.85 km/s and a V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio between 1.77–1.81. For this velocity model, there is a greater overlap of the hypocentral clouds from both networks, and about 80% of the earthquakes of the CSIR-NGRI network were located within depths ≤ 7 km. We find that location errors vary seasonally, which is also related to the V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> of the crust. Since earlier studies have also found a strong correspondence between rainfall and seismicity in this region, we infer that the high V<sub>P</sub>/V<sub>S</sub> ratio might have been caused by the rainfall saturation of cracks in the Palghar seismicity zone.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Seismology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10223-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Significance of VP/VS ratio in locating earthquakes of a long-duration swarm in the western coast of India
The earthquake swarm in Palghar, western India, is a natural laboratory to understand long-duration seismogenesis. However, it requires an accurate estimation of the key parameters, such as earthquake locations and the velocity model of the region. Two separate studies performed by two organisations in India, the CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI) and the National Center for Seismology (NCS) reported significantly differing results from the first 8–12 months of earthquake monitoring in Palghar. CSIR-NGRI reported the depth of earthquakes in the range of 4–15 km, whereas NCS reported a much shallower depth down to 7 km only. We investigate the reason for this depth discrepancy by analysing datasets from the networks of both these organisations. We find that no available velocity models are able to reconcile the depth difference between the two datasets. Selection criteria generally adopted to determine a good velocity model, such as travel-time residuals and location errors, also failed to identify a suitable velocity model. Several synthetic tests helped us to identify that the network geometry and source-station separation are contributing factors to the observed depth difference. However, the main reason for the discrepancy was found to be inconsistent velocity models used for location at both networks. The main objective of our work is to estimate a velocity model which minimises the depth discrepancy between both datasets. In this regard, we synthetically generated hundreds of models with different VP and VP/VS ratios, followed by a grid search of VP and VP/VS ratios, which harmonises the location from the two datasets. The best model consists of a VP lying between 5.55–5.85 km/s and a VP/VS ratio between 1.77–1.81. For this velocity model, there is a greater overlap of the hypocentral clouds from both networks, and about 80% of the earthquakes of the CSIR-NGRI network were located within depths ≤ 7 km. We find that location errors vary seasonally, which is also related to the VP/VS of the crust. Since earlier studies have also found a strong correspondence between rainfall and seismicity in this region, we infer that the high VP/VS ratio might have been caused by the rainfall saturation of cracks in the Palghar seismicity zone.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence.
Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.