"这是一个老白人俱乐部:"有色人种教师对政策参与的看法

IF 2.9 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Review of Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1353/rhe.0.a929757
Denisa Gándara, Victoria Kim, Navdeep Kaur, Michaela Jones, Catherine Ramirez
{"title":"\"这是一个老白人俱乐部:\"有色人种教师对政策参与的看法","authors":"Denisa Gándara, Victoria Kim, Navdeep Kaur, Michaela Jones, Catherine Ramirez","doi":"10.1353/rhe.0.a929757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scholars of color remain underrepresented in policymaking contexts, and the absence of their expertise in policy processes can have significant consequences for society. In this study, we examine motivations for and perceived barriers to engagement in public policymaking among faculty of color. Using an institutional logics framework and interviews with 20 tenure-stream faculty of color at 20 research universities, we identify three main themes that elucidate their perceptions of public policy engagement: (1) the network-driven, racialized nature of public policymaking spaces; (2) communal motivations and perceived benefits of public policy engagement; and (3) the double-edged sword of engaging with public policymaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":47732,"journal":{"name":"Review of Higher Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's an Old White Boys' Club:\\\" Faculty of Color's Perceptions of Policy Engagement\",\"authors\":\"Denisa Gándara, Victoria Kim, Navdeep Kaur, Michaela Jones, Catherine Ramirez\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/rhe.0.a929757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Scholars of color remain underrepresented in policymaking contexts, and the absence of their expertise in policy processes can have significant consequences for society. In this study, we examine motivations for and perceived barriers to engagement in public policymaking among faculty of color. Using an institutional logics framework and interviews with 20 tenure-stream faculty of color at 20 research universities, we identify three main themes that elucidate their perceptions of public policy engagement: (1) the network-driven, racialized nature of public policymaking spaces; (2) communal motivations and perceived benefits of public policy engagement; and (3) the double-edged sword of engaging with public policymaking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a929757\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.0.a929757","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有色人种学者在决策环境中的代表性仍然不足,他们在政策过程中专业知识的缺失会对社会产生重大影响。在这项研究中,我们考察了有色人种教师参与公共决策的动机和感知到的障碍。通过使用制度逻辑框架和对 20 所研究型大学中 20 名终身教职的有色人种教师的访谈,我们确定了三大主题来阐释他们对公共政策参与的看法:(1)公共决策空间的网络驱动和种族化性质;(2)公共政策参与的社区动机和感知利益;以及(3)参与公共决策的双刃剑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"It's an Old White Boys' Club:" Faculty of Color's Perceptions of Policy Engagement

Scholars of color remain underrepresented in policymaking contexts, and the absence of their expertise in policy processes can have significant consequences for society. In this study, we examine motivations for and perceived barriers to engagement in public policymaking among faculty of color. Using an institutional logics framework and interviews with 20 tenure-stream faculty of color at 20 research universities, we identify three main themes that elucidate their perceptions of public policy engagement: (1) the network-driven, racialized nature of public policymaking spaces; (2) communal motivations and perceived benefits of public policy engagement; and (3) the double-edged sword of engaging with public policymaking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Higher Education
Review of Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE), The Review of Higher Education provides a forum for discussion of issues affecting higher education. The journal advances the study of college and university issues by publishing peer-reviewed articles, essays, reviews, and research findings. Its broad approach emphasizes systematic inquiry and practical implications. Considered one of the leading research journals in the field, The Review keeps scholars, academic leaders, and public policymakers abreast of critical issues facing higher education today.
期刊最新文献
Hoped-For Selves: Using Possible Selves to Explore the Career and College-Going Aspirations for Gang-Involved Latino Boys Tenure Bans: An Exploratory Study of State Legislation Proposing to Eliminate Faculty Tenure, 2012-2022 Black Taxes: African-American Doctoral Students Experiencing Tokenism at a Predominantly White Institution "It's an Old White Boys' Club:" Faculty of Color's Perceptions of Policy Engagement Language and Postsecondary Trajectories: How "Ever-English Learner" Status Predicts College Student Pathways and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1