开发并验证用于评估讨论皮肤外科手术技术的教育视频的新工具

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.2147/ccid.s469592
Fatimah J Almuqarrab, Nuha Alfurayh, Khalid AlGhamdi
{"title":"开发并验证用于评估讨论皮肤外科手术技术的教育视频的新工具","authors":"Fatimah J Almuqarrab, Nuha Alfurayh, Khalid AlGhamdi","doi":"10.2147/ccid.s469592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> The available tools for evaluating scientific content target written scientific evidence and referencing without considering surgical, technical, or video graphic aspects.<br/><strong>Objective:</strong> This study developed and validated a tool for qualitatively evaluating videos in the field of skin surgery. This will increase the quality of recorded surgical materials published online and ultimately enhance the reliability of streaming platforms as educational resources.<br/><strong>Methodology:</strong> Tool development included several stages: draft generation, expert panel setting, internal reliability testing, and pilot study.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> After two rounds of expert panels evaluating the developed tool, 23 relevant items evaluating the educational value, scientific accuracy, and clarity of the surgical technical steps of the videos were obtained. We applied the tool to the top 25 YouTube videos discussing elliptical excision. Internal consistency, reliability, and substantial agreement between the raters were identified. We identified a strong positive correlation between our tool score and the global rating score (r= 0.55, P= 0.004).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> It is critical to avoid relying on any video for educational purposes. The tool generated and validated in our study can determine a video’s value. A pilot study of 25 YouTube videos demonstrated that the available videos are of fair-good quality, thus necessitating the need for high-quality video production.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":10447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of a New Tool for Evaluating Educational Videos Discussing Skin Surgical Procedure Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Fatimah J Almuqarrab, Nuha Alfurayh, Khalid AlGhamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/ccid.s469592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background:</strong> The available tools for evaluating scientific content target written scientific evidence and referencing without considering surgical, technical, or video graphic aspects.<br/><strong>Objective:</strong> This study developed and validated a tool for qualitatively evaluating videos in the field of skin surgery. This will increase the quality of recorded surgical materials published online and ultimately enhance the reliability of streaming platforms as educational resources.<br/><strong>Methodology:</strong> Tool development included several stages: draft generation, expert panel setting, internal reliability testing, and pilot study.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> After two rounds of expert panels evaluating the developed tool, 23 relevant items evaluating the educational value, scientific accuracy, and clarity of the surgical technical steps of the videos were obtained. We applied the tool to the top 25 YouTube videos discussing elliptical excision. Internal consistency, reliability, and substantial agreement between the raters were identified. We identified a strong positive correlation between our tool score and the global rating score (r= 0.55, P= 0.004).<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> It is critical to avoid relying on any video for educational purposes. The tool generated and validated in our study can determine a video’s value. A pilot study of 25 YouTube videos demonstrated that the available videos are of fair-good quality, thus necessitating the need for high-quality video production.<br/><br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s469592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s469592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的科学内容评估工具以书面科学证据和参考文献为目标,而不考虑手术、技术或视频图像方面:本研究开发并验证了一种对皮肤外科领域视频进行定性评估的工具。这将提高在线发布的手术录制材料的质量,并最终提高流媒体平台作为教育资源的可靠性:工具开发包括几个阶段:草稿生成、专家小组设置、内部可靠性测试和试点研究:结果:经过两轮专家小组对所开发工具的评估,获得了 23 个相关项目,对视频的教育价值、科学准确性和手术技术步骤的清晰度进行了评估。我们将该工具应用于 YouTube 上排名前 25 位的讨论椭圆切除术的视频。结果表明,评分者之间存在内部一致性、可靠性和实质性一致。我们发现我们的工具得分与总体评分得分之间存在很强的正相关性(r= 0.55,P= 0.004):避免依赖任何视频进行教育至关重要。在我们的研究中生成并验证的工具可以确定视频的价值。对 25 个 YouTube 视频的试点研究表明,现有视频的质量尚可,因此有必要制作高质量的视频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and Validation of a New Tool for Evaluating Educational Videos Discussing Skin Surgical Procedure Techniques
Background: The available tools for evaluating scientific content target written scientific evidence and referencing without considering surgical, technical, or video graphic aspects.
Objective: This study developed and validated a tool for qualitatively evaluating videos in the field of skin surgery. This will increase the quality of recorded surgical materials published online and ultimately enhance the reliability of streaming platforms as educational resources.
Methodology: Tool development included several stages: draft generation, expert panel setting, internal reliability testing, and pilot study.
Results: After two rounds of expert panels evaluating the developed tool, 23 relevant items evaluating the educational value, scientific accuracy, and clarity of the surgical technical steps of the videos were obtained. We applied the tool to the top 25 YouTube videos discussing elliptical excision. Internal consistency, reliability, and substantial agreement between the raters were identified. We identified a strong positive correlation between our tool score and the global rating score (r= 0.55, P= 0.004).
Conclusion: It is critical to avoid relying on any video for educational purposes. The tool generated and validated in our study can determine a video’s value. A pilot study of 25 YouTube videos demonstrated that the available videos are of fair-good quality, thus necessitating the need for high-quality video production.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the latest clinical and experimental research in all aspects of skin disease and cosmetic interventions. Normal and pathological processes in skin development and aging, their modification and treatment, as well as basic research into histology of dermal and dermal structures that provide clinical insights and potential treatment options are key topics for the journal. Patient satisfaction, preference, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new management options to optimize outcomes for target conditions constitute major areas of interest. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of clinical studies, reviews and original research in skin research and skin care. All areas of dermatology will be covered; contributions will be welcomed from all clinicians and basic science researchers globally.
期刊最新文献
Causal Relationship of Skin Microbiota on Psoriasis: A Mendelian Randomization Study Genetic Causal Relationship Between Sex Hormones and Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study Photodynamic Therapy for Condyloma Acuminatum and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade I in a Young Female Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report Turn Your AART into a HIT Using a Complete Range of Aesthetic Injectables: Methodology for Combining Products to Maximise Patient Outcomes Anogenital Warts in Geriatrics: Immunosenescence and New Sexual Contacts? A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1