{"title":"同步逻辑节奏","authors":"John M. Myers, Hadi Madrid","doi":"arxiv-2405.20788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A proof in quantum theory made twenty years ago prompts interrelated\ndevelopments in physics, biology, graph theory, and the philosophy of science.\nThe proof shows an ineradicable need for guesswork, beyond logic, to link\nphysical evidence to any theoretical explanation. In physics and in biology,\nrecognizing guesswork reveals a kind of synchronization, found in digital\ncomputer hardware but overlooked in theoretical physics, with implications for\na biological basis to the concepts of time and distance in physics. By refuting the assumption that \"physical\" implies \"eventually entirely\nexplicable,\" the proof inspires renewed attention to experimental practice.\nPervasive in the practice of modern science, digital computation and\ncommunications depends on physically distinct conditions and transitions among\nthem. Organizing these conditions and transitions depends on a form of\nsynchronization unlike that usual in physics. As shown here, this logical\nsynchronization: (1) is essential to computing and digital communications\nnetworks, and (2) requires guesswork for its maintenance, whether directly or\nin the design of automated maintenance. By abstracting digital hardware, we model human thinking as logically\nsynchronized computation, punctuated by unforeseeable changes. We adapt marked\ngraphs to sharpen understandings of computation, whether it is electronic or\ntakes place in living organisms. The marked graphs reveal a logical\nsubstructure to spatial and temporal navigation, with implications across\nphysics and its applications to other sciences. By limiting our model to\nthelogical aspect of communications and computations -- leaving out energy,\nweight, shape, etc. -- we reveal logical structure applicable not just in\nelectronics but also to the functioning of living organisms.","PeriodicalId":501190,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synchronizing Rhythms of Logic\",\"authors\":\"John M. Myers, Hadi Madrid\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2405.20788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A proof in quantum theory made twenty years ago prompts interrelated\\ndevelopments in physics, biology, graph theory, and the philosophy of science.\\nThe proof shows an ineradicable need for guesswork, beyond logic, to link\\nphysical evidence to any theoretical explanation. In physics and in biology,\\nrecognizing guesswork reveals a kind of synchronization, found in digital\\ncomputer hardware but overlooked in theoretical physics, with implications for\\na biological basis to the concepts of time and distance in physics. By refuting the assumption that \\\"physical\\\" implies \\\"eventually entirely\\nexplicable,\\\" the proof inspires renewed attention to experimental practice.\\nPervasive in the practice of modern science, digital computation and\\ncommunications depends on physically distinct conditions and transitions among\\nthem. Organizing these conditions and transitions depends on a form of\\nsynchronization unlike that usual in physics. As shown here, this logical\\nsynchronization: (1) is essential to computing and digital communications\\nnetworks, and (2) requires guesswork for its maintenance, whether directly or\\nin the design of automated maintenance. By abstracting digital hardware, we model human thinking as logically\\nsynchronized computation, punctuated by unforeseeable changes. We adapt marked\\ngraphs to sharpen understandings of computation, whether it is electronic or\\ntakes place in living organisms. The marked graphs reveal a logical\\nsubstructure to spatial and temporal navigation, with implications across\\nphysics and its applications to other sciences. By limiting our model to\\nthelogical aspect of communications and computations -- leaving out energy,\\nweight, shape, etc. -- we reveal logical structure applicable not just in\\nelectronics but also to the functioning of living organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.20788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - General Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2405.20788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A proof in quantum theory made twenty years ago prompts interrelated
developments in physics, biology, graph theory, and the philosophy of science.
The proof shows an ineradicable need for guesswork, beyond logic, to link
physical evidence to any theoretical explanation. In physics and in biology,
recognizing guesswork reveals a kind of synchronization, found in digital
computer hardware but overlooked in theoretical physics, with implications for
a biological basis to the concepts of time and distance in physics. By refuting the assumption that "physical" implies "eventually entirely
explicable," the proof inspires renewed attention to experimental practice.
Pervasive in the practice of modern science, digital computation and
communications depends on physically distinct conditions and transitions among
them. Organizing these conditions and transitions depends on a form of
synchronization unlike that usual in physics. As shown here, this logical
synchronization: (1) is essential to computing and digital communications
networks, and (2) requires guesswork for its maintenance, whether directly or
in the design of automated maintenance. By abstracting digital hardware, we model human thinking as logically
synchronized computation, punctuated by unforeseeable changes. We adapt marked
graphs to sharpen understandings of computation, whether it is electronic or
takes place in living organisms. The marked graphs reveal a logical
substructure to spatial and temporal navigation, with implications across
physics and its applications to other sciences. By limiting our model to
thelogical aspect of communications and computations -- leaving out energy,
weight, shape, etc. -- we reveal logical structure applicable not just in
electronics but also to the functioning of living organisms.