膳食中补充丁酸梭菌和瘤胃保护脂肪可改变山羊的免疫反应、瘤胃发酵和细菌群落

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116014
Peixin Jiao , Ziwei Wang , Xinlong Zhang , Xiaotan Lu , Qinglong Sun , Hongyu Zhao , Hangshu Xin , Wenzhu Yang , Xiaoyang Lv , Xiaolai Xie , Yu Hou
{"title":"膳食中补充丁酸梭菌和瘤胃保护脂肪可改变山羊的免疫反应、瘤胃发酵和细菌群落","authors":"Peixin Jiao ,&nbsp;Ziwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xinlong Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaotan Lu ,&nbsp;Qinglong Sun ,&nbsp;Hongyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Hangshu Xin ,&nbsp;Wenzhu Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Lv ,&nbsp;Xiaolai Xie ,&nbsp;Yu Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this investigation was to explore the impact of supplementing goats’ diets with <em>Clostridium butyricum</em> (CB) and rumen protected fat (RPF) on rumen fermentation characteristics, bacterial communities, and immune responses. Thirty-two male Saanen goats (initial body weight of 20.5 ± 0.82 kg) were used in a study with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatment. The 4 treatments were the combination of 2 RPF dosages (0 vs. 30 g/d) and 2 CB levels (0 vs. 1.0 g/d) with a 14-d adaptation and 70-d experimental period. The goats were individually housed in pens (1.2 × 1.2 m) with free access to water and fed <em>ad libitum</em> with a total mixed ration (TMR) at 08:00 and 18:00. The TMR consisted of 400 g/kg roughage and 600 g/kg concentrate (dry matter basis). The blood was collected via jugular vein from each goat before the morning feeding on d 69 of experimental period. The rumen and cecum fluid samples were collected after slaughter. Supplementation of CB decreased concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (<em>P</em> = 0.048), lowered density lipoprotein (<em>P</em> = 0.050) and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (<em>P</em> = 0.015), but increased concentrations of superoxide dismutase (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), catalase (<em>P</em> = 0.006), immunoglobulin A (<em>P</em> = 0.032), and immunoglobulin G (<em>P</em> = 0.013). The RPF supplementation also elevated the blood glucose concentration (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The rumen pH was not changed by CB, whereas it was decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) by RPF. Feeding CB did not change the total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration or VFA profiles, whereas RPF supplementation tended (<em>P</em> = 0.051) to increase the total VFA concentration. The supplementation of CB increased (<em>P</em> = 0.048) rumen NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration. No interaction between CB and RPF was noticed for alpha diversity indexes or bacterial communities in the rumen or cecum. The gastrointestinal alpha diversity indexes remained unaffected by CB, whereas they increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) with RPF supplementation except for indexes of amplicon sequence variants, Simpson and Chao1 in the rumen. Unweighted uniFrac analysis indicated that the groups supplemented with or without RPF clustered separately from each other either in the content of rumen or cecum. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of <em>Spirochaetota</em> increased with supplementation of CB either in the rumen (<em>P</em> = 0.019) or cecum (<em>P</em> = 0.008). Additionally, relative abundance of <em>Firmicutes</em> increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and the relative abundances of <em>Bacteroidota</em> and <em>Desulfobacterota</em> decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) with supplementation of RPF both in the rumen and cecum. At the genus level, the <em>Prevotella</em> abundance increased and the abundances of <em>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</em> and <em>NK4A214_group</em> decreased both in the rumen and cecum (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.10) by adding CB. Furthermore, RPF supplementation increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) the abundances of <em>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, [Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group_unclassified, Lachnospiraceae_unclassified</em> and <em>Ruminococcaceae_unclassified.</em> In conclusion, supplementation of CB enhanced the immune responses of goats, and RPF supplementation demonstrated beneficial effects on rumen fermentation by modulating the gastrointestinal bacterial community composition in goats.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary supplementation of Clostridium butyricum and rumen protected fat alters immune responses, rumen fermentation, and bacterial communities of goats\",\"authors\":\"Peixin Jiao ,&nbsp;Ziwei Wang ,&nbsp;Xinlong Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiaotan Lu ,&nbsp;Qinglong Sun ,&nbsp;Hongyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Hangshu Xin ,&nbsp;Wenzhu Yang ,&nbsp;Xiaoyang Lv ,&nbsp;Xiaolai Xie ,&nbsp;Yu Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this investigation was to explore the impact of supplementing goats’ diets with <em>Clostridium butyricum</em> (CB) and rumen protected fat (RPF) on rumen fermentation characteristics, bacterial communities, and immune responses. Thirty-two male Saanen goats (initial body weight of 20.5 ± 0.82 kg) were used in a study with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatment. The 4 treatments were the combination of 2 RPF dosages (0 vs. 30 g/d) and 2 CB levels (0 vs. 1.0 g/d) with a 14-d adaptation and 70-d experimental period. The goats were individually housed in pens (1.2 × 1.2 m) with free access to water and fed <em>ad libitum</em> with a total mixed ration (TMR) at 08:00 and 18:00. The TMR consisted of 400 g/kg roughage and 600 g/kg concentrate (dry matter basis). The blood was collected via jugular vein from each goat before the morning feeding on d 69 of experimental period. The rumen and cecum fluid samples were collected after slaughter. Supplementation of CB decreased concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (<em>P</em> = 0.048), lowered density lipoprotein (<em>P</em> = 0.050) and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (<em>P</em> = 0.015), but increased concentrations of superoxide dismutase (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), catalase (<em>P</em> = 0.006), immunoglobulin A (<em>P</em> = 0.032), and immunoglobulin G (<em>P</em> = 0.013). The RPF supplementation also elevated the blood glucose concentration (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). The rumen pH was not changed by CB, whereas it was decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) by RPF. Feeding CB did not change the total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration or VFA profiles, whereas RPF supplementation tended (<em>P</em> = 0.051) to increase the total VFA concentration. The supplementation of CB increased (<em>P</em> = 0.048) rumen NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration. No interaction between CB and RPF was noticed for alpha diversity indexes or bacterial communities in the rumen or cecum. The gastrointestinal alpha diversity indexes remained unaffected by CB, whereas they increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) with RPF supplementation except for indexes of amplicon sequence variants, Simpson and Chao1 in the rumen. Unweighted uniFrac analysis indicated that the groups supplemented with or without RPF clustered separately from each other either in the content of rumen or cecum. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of <em>Spirochaetota</em> increased with supplementation of CB either in the rumen (<em>P</em> = 0.019) or cecum (<em>P</em> = 0.008). Additionally, relative abundance of <em>Firmicutes</em> increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and the relative abundances of <em>Bacteroidota</em> and <em>Desulfobacterota</em> decreased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) with supplementation of RPF both in the rumen and cecum. At the genus level, the <em>Prevotella</em> abundance increased and the abundances of <em>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group</em> and <em>NK4A214_group</em> decreased both in the rumen and cecum (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.10) by adding CB. Furthermore, RPF supplementation increased (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) the abundances of <em>Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, [Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group_unclassified, Lachnospiraceae_unclassified</em> and <em>Ruminococcaceae_unclassified.</em> In conclusion, supplementation of CB enhanced the immune responses of goats, and RPF supplementation demonstrated beneficial effects on rumen fermentation by modulating the gastrointestinal bacterial community composition in goats.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Feed Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001421\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在山羊日粮中添加丁酸梭菌(CB)和瘤胃保护脂肪(RPF)对瘤胃发酵特性、细菌群落和免疫反应的影响。研究使用了 32 只雄性萨能山羊(初始体重为 20.5 ± 0.82 千克),采用 2 × 2 的因子处理排列。4 种处理是 2 种 RPF 剂量(0 vs. 30 克/天)和 2 种 CB 水平(0 vs. 1.0 克/天)的组合,适应期为 14 天,实验期为 70 天。山羊单独饲养在围栏(1.2 × 1.2 m)中,可自由饮水,并在 08:00 和 18:00 自由采食全混合饲料(TMR)。全混合饲料包括每千克 400 克粗饲料和每千克 600 克精饲料(干物质基)。在实验期第 69 天早晨饲喂前,通过颈静脉采集每只山羊的血液。瘤胃和盲肠液样本在宰杀后采集。补充 CB 降低了天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(P = 0.048)、低密度脂蛋白(P = 0.050)和天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶/丙氨酸氨基转移酶(P = 0.015)的浓度,但提高了超氧化物歧化酶(P < 0.001)、过氧化氢酶(P = 0.006)、免疫球蛋白 A(P = 0.032)和免疫球蛋白 G(P = 0.013)的浓度。补充 RPF 还能提高血糖浓度(P < 0.001)。CB 未改变瘤胃 pH 值,而 RPF 则降低了 pH 值(P < 0.001)。饲喂CB不会改变总挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)浓度或VFA曲线,而补充RPF则会增加总挥发性脂肪酸浓度(P = 0.051)。补充 CB 会增加(P = 0.048)瘤胃中的 NH3-N 浓度。CB和RPF对瘤胃或盲肠中的α多样性指数或细菌群落没有交互作用。除了瘤胃中的扩增子序列变异、Simpson 和 Chao1 的指数外,胃肠道阿尔法多样性指数不受 CB 的影响,而在补充 RPF 后则有所增加(P < 0.05)。非加权uniFrac分析表明,添加或不添加RPF的各组在瘤胃或盲肠的含量上相互独立。在门的水平上,瘤胃(P = 0.019)或盲肠(P = 0.008)中螺旋体的相对丰度随着补充 CB 而增加。此外,在瘤胃和盲肠中补充 RPF 后,固着菌的相对丰度增加(P < 0.05),类杆菌和脱硫菌的相对丰度降低(P < 0.05)。在菌属水平上,添加 CB 后,瘤胃和盲肠中的 Prevotella 丰度增加,Christensenellaceae_R-7_group 和 NK4A214_group 的丰度降低(P < 0.10)。此外,补充 RPF 还增加了 Christensenellaceae_R-7_组、[Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group_unclassified、Lachnospiraceae_unclassified 和 Ruminococcaceae_unclassified 的丰度(P < 0.05)。总之,补充 CB 可增强山羊的免疫反应,而补充 RPF 则可通过调节山羊的胃肠道细菌群落组成,对瘤胃发酵产生有益影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dietary supplementation of Clostridium butyricum and rumen protected fat alters immune responses, rumen fermentation, and bacterial communities of goats

The objective of this investigation was to explore the impact of supplementing goats’ diets with Clostridium butyricum (CB) and rumen protected fat (RPF) on rumen fermentation characteristics, bacterial communities, and immune responses. Thirty-two male Saanen goats (initial body weight of 20.5 ± 0.82 kg) were used in a study with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatment. The 4 treatments were the combination of 2 RPF dosages (0 vs. 30 g/d) and 2 CB levels (0 vs. 1.0 g/d) with a 14-d adaptation and 70-d experimental period. The goats were individually housed in pens (1.2 × 1.2 m) with free access to water and fed ad libitum with a total mixed ration (TMR) at 08:00 and 18:00. The TMR consisted of 400 g/kg roughage and 600 g/kg concentrate (dry matter basis). The blood was collected via jugular vein from each goat before the morning feeding on d 69 of experimental period. The rumen and cecum fluid samples were collected after slaughter. Supplementation of CB decreased concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (P = 0.048), lowered density lipoprotein (P = 0.050) and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.015), but increased concentrations of superoxide dismutase (P < 0.001), catalase (P = 0.006), immunoglobulin A (P = 0.032), and immunoglobulin G (P = 0.013). The RPF supplementation also elevated the blood glucose concentration (P < 0.001). The rumen pH was not changed by CB, whereas it was decreased (P < 0.001) by RPF. Feeding CB did not change the total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration or VFA profiles, whereas RPF supplementation tended (P = 0.051) to increase the total VFA concentration. The supplementation of CB increased (P = 0.048) rumen NH3-N concentration. No interaction between CB and RPF was noticed for alpha diversity indexes or bacterial communities in the rumen or cecum. The gastrointestinal alpha diversity indexes remained unaffected by CB, whereas they increased (P < 0.05) with RPF supplementation except for indexes of amplicon sequence variants, Simpson and Chao1 in the rumen. Unweighted uniFrac analysis indicated that the groups supplemented with or without RPF clustered separately from each other either in the content of rumen or cecum. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Spirochaetota increased with supplementation of CB either in the rumen (P = 0.019) or cecum (P = 0.008). Additionally, relative abundance of Firmicutes increased (P < 0.05), and the relative abundances of Bacteroidota and Desulfobacterota decreased (P < 0.05) with supplementation of RPF both in the rumen and cecum. At the genus level, the Prevotella abundance increased and the abundances of Christensenellaceae_R-7_group and NK4A214_group decreased both in the rumen and cecum (P < 0.10) by adding CB. Furthermore, RPF supplementation increased (P < 0.05) the abundances of Christensenellaceae_R-7_group, [Eubacterium]_coprostanoligenes_group_unclassified, Lachnospiraceae_unclassified and Ruminococcaceae_unclassified. In conclusion, supplementation of CB enhanced the immune responses of goats, and RPF supplementation demonstrated beneficial effects on rumen fermentation by modulating the gastrointestinal bacterial community composition in goats.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
The anti-methanogenic efficacy of Asparagopsis taxiformis: Could it be attributable solely to its bromoform content? Branched-chain amino acids supplementation in low-protein broiler diets: A review Effect of diets with similar nutrient core with increasing starch as filler in growth performance and survival of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) cultured at three different temperatures Fishery wastes as feed additive for the red claw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus: Impact on growth, biochemical composition, and digestive activity Could we partially replace maize with nut skins for more sustainable sheep diets? In vitro ruminal fermentation and biohydrogenation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1