哈莱姆的麦克白:从《开端》到《阳光下的葡萄干》的美国黑人剧院》,克利福德-梅森著(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER THEATRE JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-06-06 DOI:10.1353/tj.2024.a929526
Cheryl Black
{"title":"哈莱姆的麦克白:从《开端》到《阳光下的葡萄干》的美国黑人剧院》,克利福德-梅森著(评论)","authors":"Cheryl Black","doi":"10.1353/tj.2024.a929526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theater in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun</em> by Clifford Mason <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Cheryl Black </li> </ul> <em>MACBETH IN HARLEM: BLACK THEATER IN AMERICA FROM THE BEGINNING TO RAISIN IN THE SUN</em>. By Clifford Mason. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2020; pp. 234. <p>As indicated by its subtitle, Clifford Mason’s <em>Macbeth in Harlem</em> traces the history of Black theatre in the United States from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to the appearance of Lorraine Hansberry’s <em>A Raisin in the Sun</em> in 1959. Mason, who once described this book on X as a “fighting history of Black Theatre,” is committed to exposing the obstacles confronting the artists he writes about. It is a story that unfolds against a context of virulent anti-Black racism, enslavement, and de jure and de facto segregation and discrimination. While it is a story that ends before the momentous political achievements of a reinvigorated civil rights movement in the 1960s, Mason’s text still resonates <strong>[End Page 116]</strong> in the twenty-first-century US, the era in which a new civil rights movement has emerged to persuade the nation and the world that Black Lives Matter and in which a coalition of theatre artists of color issued the “We See You, White American Theater” (WSYWAT) manifesto to demand an end to systemic racism within the industry.</p> <p>Mason employs two controlling ideas throughout the narrative. Although the Federal Theatre Project’s Black-cast production of <em>Macbeth</em> is discussed, “Macbeth in Harlem” also serves as a metaphor for a kind of inclusion and recognition sought by Black theatre artists within US cultural life. The second recurring theme—evoked in almost every chapter to describe the nature of Black theatre artists’ “progress”—is the myth of Sisyphus, who continually pushes a boulder up a steep hill only to have it roll back down just as he approaches the top. Taking Orson Welles’s exoticized “voodoo <em>Macbeth</em>” as a progressive benchmark may seem problematic, but as a metaphor for wide-ranging inclusivity and increased representation, it is reasonably apt. Mason’s Sisyphean metaphor seems even more apt and in keeping with recent WSYWAT activism to combat systemic racism within the theatre that persists despite increased representation by Black playwrights and performers.</p> <p>The book is organized chronologically and composed of a brief introduction and six chapters, each surveying a particular timespan. <em>Macbeth in Harlem</em> is narrower in scope than Errol Hill and James Hatch’s comprehensive history of African American theatre published in 2003, though considerably broader than much recent scholarship in the field. For a relatively slim volume, it is remarkably detailed, yet also remarkably succinct in expression, an attribute that makes it particularly suitable for one-semester history undergraduate classes (with the hope that a second semester would then focus on Black theatre from <em>A Raisin in the Sun</em> to the present).</p> <p>Mason’s concept of Black theatre encompasses any theatrical performance that portrays Black characters or features Black performers in significant roles. This perspective gives considerable attention to white-authored works, from those deemed noteworthy because of their pernicious impact to those Mason credits with progressive and truthful portrayals of Black life and artistry. The former group includes, among others, blackface minstrelsy performances, <em>Uncle Tom’s Cabin</em> (1852), <em>The Octoroon</em> (1859), and <em>The Green Pastures</em> (1930), all infamous for their perpetuation of false, dehumanizing, and degrading “realities,” such as the “demeaned servile,” “the forgiving,” the “unintelligible,” idiotic, and self-denigrating Black characters (57, 59, 63, 66). Mason’s analyses of mid-twentieth-century revivals of <em>Uncle Tom’s Cabin</em> and <em>The Octoroon</em> are particularly illuminating (and make one long to know what Mason thinks of Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s recent riff on the latter).</p> <p>Progressive exemplars include: the Federal Theatre Project’s <em>Macbeth</em> (1936) and the Mercury Theatre’s <em>Faustus</em> (1937), which revealed Black actors’ mastery of “classic” work; the Theatre Union’s <em>Stevedore</em> (1934), which featured Black laborers’ militant resistance to exploitation; and the Theatre Guild’s <em>They Shall Not Die</em> (1934), which dramatized the trial of the Scottsboro Boys, who were falsely accused of rape. Mason devotes thoughtful attention to Edward Sheldon’s <em>The Nigger</em> (1909...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theater in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun by Clifford Mason (review)\",\"authors\":\"Cheryl Black\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tj.2024.a929526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theater in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun</em> by Clifford Mason <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Cheryl Black </li> </ul> <em>MACBETH IN HARLEM: BLACK THEATER IN AMERICA FROM THE BEGINNING TO RAISIN IN THE SUN</em>. By Clifford Mason. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2020; pp. 234. <p>As indicated by its subtitle, Clifford Mason’s <em>Macbeth in Harlem</em> traces the history of Black theatre in the United States from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to the appearance of Lorraine Hansberry’s <em>A Raisin in the Sun</em> in 1959. Mason, who once described this book on X as a “fighting history of Black Theatre,” is committed to exposing the obstacles confronting the artists he writes about. It is a story that unfolds against a context of virulent anti-Black racism, enslavement, and de jure and de facto segregation and discrimination. While it is a story that ends before the momentous political achievements of a reinvigorated civil rights movement in the 1960s, Mason’s text still resonates <strong>[End Page 116]</strong> in the twenty-first-century US, the era in which a new civil rights movement has emerged to persuade the nation and the world that Black Lives Matter and in which a coalition of theatre artists of color issued the “We See You, White American Theater” (WSYWAT) manifesto to demand an end to systemic racism within the industry.</p> <p>Mason employs two controlling ideas throughout the narrative. Although the Federal Theatre Project’s Black-cast production of <em>Macbeth</em> is discussed, “Macbeth in Harlem” also serves as a metaphor for a kind of inclusion and recognition sought by Black theatre artists within US cultural life. The second recurring theme—evoked in almost every chapter to describe the nature of Black theatre artists’ “progress”—is the myth of Sisyphus, who continually pushes a boulder up a steep hill only to have it roll back down just as he approaches the top. Taking Orson Welles’s exoticized “voodoo <em>Macbeth</em>” as a progressive benchmark may seem problematic, but as a metaphor for wide-ranging inclusivity and increased representation, it is reasonably apt. Mason’s Sisyphean metaphor seems even more apt and in keeping with recent WSYWAT activism to combat systemic racism within the theatre that persists despite increased representation by Black playwrights and performers.</p> <p>The book is organized chronologically and composed of a brief introduction and six chapters, each surveying a particular timespan. <em>Macbeth in Harlem</em> is narrower in scope than Errol Hill and James Hatch’s comprehensive history of African American theatre published in 2003, though considerably broader than much recent scholarship in the field. For a relatively slim volume, it is remarkably detailed, yet also remarkably succinct in expression, an attribute that makes it particularly suitable for one-semester history undergraduate classes (with the hope that a second semester would then focus on Black theatre from <em>A Raisin in the Sun</em> to the present).</p> <p>Mason’s concept of Black theatre encompasses any theatrical performance that portrays Black characters or features Black performers in significant roles. This perspective gives considerable attention to white-authored works, from those deemed noteworthy because of their pernicious impact to those Mason credits with progressive and truthful portrayals of Black life and artistry. The former group includes, among others, blackface minstrelsy performances, <em>Uncle Tom’s Cabin</em> (1852), <em>The Octoroon</em> (1859), and <em>The Green Pastures</em> (1930), all infamous for their perpetuation of false, dehumanizing, and degrading “realities,” such as the “demeaned servile,” “the forgiving,” the “unintelligible,” idiotic, and self-denigrating Black characters (57, 59, 63, 66). Mason’s analyses of mid-twentieth-century revivals of <em>Uncle Tom’s Cabin</em> and <em>The Octoroon</em> are particularly illuminating (and make one long to know what Mason thinks of Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s recent riff on the latter).</p> <p>Progressive exemplars include: the Federal Theatre Project’s <em>Macbeth</em> (1936) and the Mercury Theatre’s <em>Faustus</em> (1937), which revealed Black actors’ mastery of “classic” work; the Theatre Union’s <em>Stevedore</em> (1934), which featured Black laborers’ militant resistance to exploitation; and the Theatre Guild’s <em>They Shall Not Die</em> (1934), which dramatized the trial of the Scottsboro Boys, who were falsely accused of rape. Mason devotes thoughtful attention to Edward Sheldon’s <em>The Nigger</em> (1909...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a929526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a929526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 哈莱姆的麦克白:美国黑人剧院从起点到阳光下的葡萄干》(Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theatre in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun),作者克利福德-梅森(Clifford Mason),谢丽尔-布莱克(Cheryl Black MACBETH IN HARLEM: BLACK THEATER IN AMERICA FROM THE BEGINNING TO RAISIN IN THE SUN.作者:克利福德-梅森。新泽西州新不伦瑞克:罗格斯大学出版社,2020 年;第 234 页。正如其副标题所示,克利福德-梅森的《哈莱姆的麦克白》追溯了美国黑人戏剧的历史,从 19 世纪初的起步到 1959 年洛林-汉斯贝里的《阳光下的葡萄干》的问世。梅森曾将这本关于 X 的书描述为 "黑人戏剧的战斗史",他致力于揭露他笔下的艺术家们所面临的障碍。这个故事是在反黑人种族主义、奴役、法律上和事实上的种族隔离和歧视等恶性事件的背景下展开的。虽然故事结束于 20 世纪 60 年代重振民权运动所取得的重大政治成就之前,但梅森的文字在 21 世纪的美国仍能产生共鸣 [第 116 页完],在这个时代,新的民权运动已经兴起,向全国乃至全世界宣传黑人的生命至关重要,有色人种戏剧艺术家联盟也发表了《我们看见你了,美国白人剧院》(WSYWAT)宣言,要求结束戏剧界的系统性种族主义。梅森在叙事中运用了两个控制性思想。虽然讨论的是联邦剧院项目的黑人演员制作的《麦克白》,但 "哈莱姆的麦克白 "也隐喻了黑人戏剧艺术家在美国文化生活中寻求的一种包容和认可。第二个反复出现的主题是西西弗斯的神话,几乎每一章都引用这个神话来描述黑人戏剧艺术家 "进步 "的本质,西西弗斯不断将巨石推上陡峭的山坡,但当他接近山顶时,巨石又滚落下来。将奥森-威尔斯异域化的 "巫术麦克白 "作为进步的标杆似乎有问题,但作为广泛包容性和增加代表性的隐喻,却是相当贴切的。梅森的 "西西弗斯式 "隐喻似乎更加贴切,也与 WSYWAT 近期的活动相吻合,即打击戏剧界的系统性种族主义,尽管黑人剧作家和表演者的代表性有所提高,但这种种族主义依然存在。该书按时间顺序编排,由一个简短的导言和六个章节组成,每个章节考察一个特定的时间段。与埃罗尔-希尔和詹姆斯-哈奇于 2003 年出版的综合性非裔美国人戏剧史相比,《哈林区的麦克白》范围较窄,但与该领域近期的许多学术著作相比,范围则要宽广得多。作为一本相对较小的著作,它的内容非常详尽,但在表达上也非常简洁,这一特点使它特别适合一个学期的历史本科课程(希望第二学期的课程能侧重于从《太阳中的葡萄干》到现在的黑人戏剧)。梅森的黑人戏剧概念包括任何描绘黑人角色或由黑人演员扮演重要角色的戏剧表演。这一视角对白人创作的作品给予了相当大的关注,从那些因其恶劣影响而被认为值得关注的作品,到那些梅森认为对黑人生活和艺术进行了进步和真实描绘的作品。前一类作品包括黑脸吟游表演、《汤姆叔叔的小屋》(Uncle Tom's Cabin,1852 年)、《拖拉机》(The Octoroon,1859 年)和《绿色牧场》(The Green Pastures,1930 年)等,这些作品都因长期塑造虚假、非人化和有辱人格的 "现实 "而臭名昭著,如 "被贬低的奴才"、"宽容的人"、"不懂事的人"、白痴和自我贬低的黑人角色(57、59、63、66)。梅森对二十世纪中期重演的《汤姆叔叔的小屋》(Uncle Tom's Cabin)和《拖拉机》(The Octoroon)的分析尤其具有启发性(让人很想知道梅森对布兰登-雅各布斯-詹金斯(Branden Jacobs-Jenkins)最近对后者的反思)。进步的范例包括:联邦剧院项目的《麦克白》(1936 年)和水星剧院的《浮士德》(1937 年),这两部剧揭示了黑人演员对 "经典 "作品的驾驭能力;剧院联盟的《装卸工》(1934 年),该剧展现了黑人劳工对剥削的激进反抗;以及剧院公会的《他们不会死》(1934 年),该剧将对被诬告犯有强奸罪的斯科茨伯勒男孩的审判戏剧化。梅森对爱德华-谢尔顿(Edward Sheldon)的《黑鬼》(1909...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theater in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun by Clifford Mason (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Macbeth in Harlem: Black Theater in America From The Beginning to Raisin in the Sun by Clifford Mason
  • Cheryl Black
MACBETH IN HARLEM: BLACK THEATER IN AMERICA FROM THE BEGINNING TO RAISIN IN THE SUN. By Clifford Mason. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2020; pp. 234.

As indicated by its subtitle, Clifford Mason’s Macbeth in Harlem traces the history of Black theatre in the United States from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to the appearance of Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun in 1959. Mason, who once described this book on X as a “fighting history of Black Theatre,” is committed to exposing the obstacles confronting the artists he writes about. It is a story that unfolds against a context of virulent anti-Black racism, enslavement, and de jure and de facto segregation and discrimination. While it is a story that ends before the momentous political achievements of a reinvigorated civil rights movement in the 1960s, Mason’s text still resonates [End Page 116] in the twenty-first-century US, the era in which a new civil rights movement has emerged to persuade the nation and the world that Black Lives Matter and in which a coalition of theatre artists of color issued the “We See You, White American Theater” (WSYWAT) manifesto to demand an end to systemic racism within the industry.

Mason employs two controlling ideas throughout the narrative. Although the Federal Theatre Project’s Black-cast production of Macbeth is discussed, “Macbeth in Harlem” also serves as a metaphor for a kind of inclusion and recognition sought by Black theatre artists within US cultural life. The second recurring theme—evoked in almost every chapter to describe the nature of Black theatre artists’ “progress”—is the myth of Sisyphus, who continually pushes a boulder up a steep hill only to have it roll back down just as he approaches the top. Taking Orson Welles’s exoticized “voodoo Macbeth” as a progressive benchmark may seem problematic, but as a metaphor for wide-ranging inclusivity and increased representation, it is reasonably apt. Mason’s Sisyphean metaphor seems even more apt and in keeping with recent WSYWAT activism to combat systemic racism within the theatre that persists despite increased representation by Black playwrights and performers.

The book is organized chronologically and composed of a brief introduction and six chapters, each surveying a particular timespan. Macbeth in Harlem is narrower in scope than Errol Hill and James Hatch’s comprehensive history of African American theatre published in 2003, though considerably broader than much recent scholarship in the field. For a relatively slim volume, it is remarkably detailed, yet also remarkably succinct in expression, an attribute that makes it particularly suitable for one-semester history undergraduate classes (with the hope that a second semester would then focus on Black theatre from A Raisin in the Sun to the present).

Mason’s concept of Black theatre encompasses any theatrical performance that portrays Black characters or features Black performers in significant roles. This perspective gives considerable attention to white-authored works, from those deemed noteworthy because of their pernicious impact to those Mason credits with progressive and truthful portrayals of Black life and artistry. The former group includes, among others, blackface minstrelsy performances, Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852), The Octoroon (1859), and The Green Pastures (1930), all infamous for their perpetuation of false, dehumanizing, and degrading “realities,” such as the “demeaned servile,” “the forgiving,” the “unintelligible,” idiotic, and self-denigrating Black characters (57, 59, 63, 66). Mason’s analyses of mid-twentieth-century revivals of Uncle Tom’s Cabin and The Octoroon are particularly illuminating (and make one long to know what Mason thinks of Branden Jacobs-Jenkins’s recent riff on the latter).

Progressive exemplars include: the Federal Theatre Project’s Macbeth (1936) and the Mercury Theatre’s Faustus (1937), which revealed Black actors’ mastery of “classic” work; the Theatre Union’s Stevedore (1934), which featured Black laborers’ militant resistance to exploitation; and the Theatre Guild’s They Shall Not Die (1934), which dramatized the trial of the Scottsboro Boys, who were falsely accused of rape. Mason devotes thoughtful attention to Edward Sheldon’s The Nigger (1909...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
期刊最新文献
Stereophonic by David Adjmi (review) Natasha, Pierre & the Great Comet of 1812 by Dave Malloy (review) Byggmeister Solness by Henrik Ibsen (review) The Many Voices of Sissieretta Jones: Opera and the Sonic Necromancy of the Black Phonographic Archive National Arts Festival (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1