医疗保险医生报销中的性别差异在不同年份和专业持续存在

S. Sekimitsu, BS Omar Alaa Halawa, Michael V. Boland, PhD Nazlee Zebardast
{"title":"医疗保险医生报销中的性别差异在不同年份和专业持续存在","authors":"S. Sekimitsu, BS Omar Alaa Halawa, Michael V. Boland, PhD Nazlee Zebardast","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The gender pay gap is wide in medicine but the extent of this disparity across specialties and over time have not been elucidated. Here we evaluate differences in Medicare reimbursement between men and women physicians over time and by specialty, controlling for physician and practice characteristics. Methods: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Payment Data was used to determine total reimbursements and number of services submitted by physicians practicing in the US between 2013 and 2019. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) were used to determine average income, unemployment rates, poverty rates, income, and educational attainment levels by zip code for each physician's practice location. Results: Among the 3,831,504 physicians included in this analysis from 2013-2019, 2,712,545 (70.8%) were men and 1,118,859 (29.2%) were women. Overall, men received more in Medicare reimbursements ($58,815 +/- $104,772 vs. $32,205 +/- $60,556, p<0.001) and billed more services (864 +/- 1,780 vs. 505 +/- 1,007, p<0.001) compared to women. The median Medicare reimbursement for men decreased from 2013 to 2019 from $59,710 to $57,874, while the median Medicare reimbursement for women increased from $30,575 to $33,456. Men were reimbursed more than women across all specialties with the greatest disparity in procedure-heavy specialties. The specialties with the highest difference in median Medicare reimbursement between men and women were ophthalmology ($99,452), dermatology ($84,844), cardiology ($64,112), nephrology ($62,352), and pulmonary medicine ($47,399). In linear regression models controlling for calendar year, years of experience, total number of services, and ACS zip-code-level variables, men received a higher amount of Medicare reimbursement in all specialties, as compared to women (p<0.01 for all). The percentage of top earning men (range: 65.0%-99.5%) surpassed the proportion of men in each specialty (range: 46.1%-94.6%), except public health and preventive medicine. Conclusions and Relevance: Women physicians continue to receive lower total Medicare reimbursements than men physicians, particularly in procedure-heavy specialties. Lower clinical volume and fewer procedural services among women physicians partially contribute to the disparities in reimbursement.","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender based disparities in Medicare physician reimbursement persist across years and specialty\",\"authors\":\"S. Sekimitsu, BS Omar Alaa Halawa, Michael V. Boland, PhD Nazlee Zebardast\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.05.24308504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The gender pay gap is wide in medicine but the extent of this disparity across specialties and over time have not been elucidated. Here we evaluate differences in Medicare reimbursement between men and women physicians over time and by specialty, controlling for physician and practice characteristics. Methods: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Payment Data was used to determine total reimbursements and number of services submitted by physicians practicing in the US between 2013 and 2019. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) were used to determine average income, unemployment rates, poverty rates, income, and educational attainment levels by zip code for each physician's practice location. Results: Among the 3,831,504 physicians included in this analysis from 2013-2019, 2,712,545 (70.8%) were men and 1,118,859 (29.2%) were women. Overall, men received more in Medicare reimbursements ($58,815 +/- $104,772 vs. $32,205 +/- $60,556, p<0.001) and billed more services (864 +/- 1,780 vs. 505 +/- 1,007, p<0.001) compared to women. The median Medicare reimbursement for men decreased from 2013 to 2019 from $59,710 to $57,874, while the median Medicare reimbursement for women increased from $30,575 to $33,456. Men were reimbursed more than women across all specialties with the greatest disparity in procedure-heavy specialties. The specialties with the highest difference in median Medicare reimbursement between men and women were ophthalmology ($99,452), dermatology ($84,844), cardiology ($64,112), nephrology ($62,352), and pulmonary medicine ($47,399). In linear regression models controlling for calendar year, years of experience, total number of services, and ACS zip-code-level variables, men received a higher amount of Medicare reimbursement in all specialties, as compared to women (p<0.01 for all). The percentage of top earning men (range: 65.0%-99.5%) surpassed the proportion of men in each specialty (range: 46.1%-94.6%), except public health and preventive medicine. Conclusions and Relevance: Women physicians continue to receive lower total Medicare reimbursements than men physicians, particularly in procedure-heavy specialties. Lower clinical volume and fewer procedural services among women physicians partially contribute to the disparities in reimbursement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308504\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.05.24308504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医学界的男女薪酬差距很大,但这种差距在不同专业和不同时期的程度尚未得到阐明。在此,我们评估了不同时期和不同专业的男女医生在医疗保险报销方面的差异,并对医生和诊所的特征进行了控制。方法:使用美国联邦医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的支付数据来确定 2013 年至 2019 年期间美国执业医师提交的报销总额和服务数量。美国社区调查(ACS)数据用于确定每位医生执业地点按邮政编码划分的平均收入、失业率、贫困率、收入和教育程度水平。结果:在 2013-2019 年期间纳入本分析的 3,831,504 名医生中,2,712,545 名(70.8%)为男性,1,118,859 名(29.2%)为女性。总体而言,与女性相比,男性获得的医疗保险报销额度更高(58,815 +/- 104,772 美元 vs. 32,205 +/- 60,556 美元,p<0.001),开具的服务账单更多(864 +/- 1,780 vs. 505 +/- 1,007,p<0.001)。从 2013 年到 2019 年,男性的医疗保险报销中位数从 59710 美元降至 57874 美元,而女性的医疗保险报销中位数则从 30575 美元增至 33456 美元。在所有专科中,男性的报销额度都高于女性,而在手术繁重的专科中,男性的报销额度差距最大。医疗保险报销中位数男女差异最大的专科是眼科(99,452 美元)、皮肤科(84,844 美元)、心脏科(64,112 美元)、肾脏内科(62,352 美元)和肺内科(47,399 美元)。在控制了日历年、工作年限、服务总次数和 ACS 邮政编码变量的线性回归模型中,与女性相比,男性在所有专科中获得的医疗保险报销金额都更高(所有数据的 p 均小于 0.01)。除公共卫生和预防医学外,收入最高的男性比例(范围:65.0%-99.5%)超过了各专科的男性比例(范围:46.1%-94.6%)。结论与相关性:女医生获得的医疗保险报销总额仍然低于男医生,尤其是在手术繁重的专科。女医生的临床量较低和程序服务较少是造成报销差异的部分原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender based disparities in Medicare physician reimbursement persist across years and specialty
Introduction: The gender pay gap is wide in medicine but the extent of this disparity across specialties and over time have not been elucidated. Here we evaluate differences in Medicare reimbursement between men and women physicians over time and by specialty, controlling for physician and practice characteristics. Methods: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Payment Data was used to determine total reimbursements and number of services submitted by physicians practicing in the US between 2013 and 2019. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) were used to determine average income, unemployment rates, poverty rates, income, and educational attainment levels by zip code for each physician's practice location. Results: Among the 3,831,504 physicians included in this analysis from 2013-2019, 2,712,545 (70.8%) were men and 1,118,859 (29.2%) were women. Overall, men received more in Medicare reimbursements ($58,815 +/- $104,772 vs. $32,205 +/- $60,556, p<0.001) and billed more services (864 +/- 1,780 vs. 505 +/- 1,007, p<0.001) compared to women. The median Medicare reimbursement for men decreased from 2013 to 2019 from $59,710 to $57,874, while the median Medicare reimbursement for women increased from $30,575 to $33,456. Men were reimbursed more than women across all specialties with the greatest disparity in procedure-heavy specialties. The specialties with the highest difference in median Medicare reimbursement between men and women were ophthalmology ($99,452), dermatology ($84,844), cardiology ($64,112), nephrology ($62,352), and pulmonary medicine ($47,399). In linear regression models controlling for calendar year, years of experience, total number of services, and ACS zip-code-level variables, men received a higher amount of Medicare reimbursement in all specialties, as compared to women (p<0.01 for all). The percentage of top earning men (range: 65.0%-99.5%) surpassed the proportion of men in each specialty (range: 46.1%-94.6%), except public health and preventive medicine. Conclusions and Relevance: Women physicians continue to receive lower total Medicare reimbursements than men physicians, particularly in procedure-heavy specialties. Lower clinical volume and fewer procedural services among women physicians partially contribute to the disparities in reimbursement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1