急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术量与预后的关系:全国住院病人样本研究

L. Fry, A. Brake, C. Heskett, F. De Stefano, A. Williams, N. Majo, C. Lei, A. Alkiswani, K. Le, A. G. Rouse, J. Peterson, K. Ebersole
{"title":"急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术量与预后的关系:全国住院病人样本研究","authors":"L. Fry, A. Brake, C. Heskett, F. De Stefano, A. Williams, N. Majo, C. Lei, A. Alkiswani, K. Le, A. G. Rouse, J. Peterson, K. Ebersole","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.04.24308466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Previous studies have reported a positive relationship between higher hospital endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) volume and shorter procedures, higher revascularization rates, and improved functional outcomes. We investigated the association between hospital EVT volume and clinical outcomes using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016-2020. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the NIS examining the relationship of hospital EVT volume and outcomes was performed. All relevant clinical and demographic information was collected. The outcomes were favorable functional outcome (home without assistance), inpatient mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Centers were classified as high-volume if they were in the top quintile of annual EVT volume. We performed univariate, multivariate, nearest neighbor matched analysis, and an exploratory annual case volume cutoff analysis. Results: There were 114,640 patients who underwent EVT included in the sample. Of these, 24,415 (21.3%) were in the high-volume group. High-volume centers had higher rates of favorable functional outcome in univariate (OR 1.20, p < 0.001), multivariate (aOR 1.19, p = 0.003), and matched analysis (OR 1.14, p = 0.028). Prior to matching, lower rates of inpatient mortality (OR 0.83, p < 0.001). However, in univariate and matched analysis there were no differences between high and low-volume centers. There were no differences in ICH across all analyses. Functional benefit was first noted at [≥] 50 EVTs, but centers performing [≥] 175 EVTs had substantially higher functional benefit (aOR 1.42, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates increased hospital case volume is associated with a modest improvement in favorable functional outcomes in patients undergoing EVT for AIS. Attempts to identify procedural cut off values reveal likely improved functional outcomes beginning at 50 EVT per year, while this benefit seems to increase with increasing case volumes. These higher levels of case volumes do not lead to higher rates of inpatient mortality or ICH. ?","PeriodicalId":506788,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy Volume and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A National Inpatient Sample Study\",\"authors\":\"L. Fry, A. Brake, C. Heskett, F. De Stefano, A. Williams, N. Majo, C. Lei, A. Alkiswani, K. Le, A. G. Rouse, J. Peterson, K. Ebersole\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.04.24308466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Previous studies have reported a positive relationship between higher hospital endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) volume and shorter procedures, higher revascularization rates, and improved functional outcomes. We investigated the association between hospital EVT volume and clinical outcomes using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016-2020. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the NIS examining the relationship of hospital EVT volume and outcomes was performed. All relevant clinical and demographic information was collected. The outcomes were favorable functional outcome (home without assistance), inpatient mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Centers were classified as high-volume if they were in the top quintile of annual EVT volume. We performed univariate, multivariate, nearest neighbor matched analysis, and an exploratory annual case volume cutoff analysis. Results: There were 114,640 patients who underwent EVT included in the sample. Of these, 24,415 (21.3%) were in the high-volume group. High-volume centers had higher rates of favorable functional outcome in univariate (OR 1.20, p < 0.001), multivariate (aOR 1.19, p = 0.003), and matched analysis (OR 1.14, p = 0.028). Prior to matching, lower rates of inpatient mortality (OR 0.83, p < 0.001). However, in univariate and matched analysis there were no differences between high and low-volume centers. There were no differences in ICH across all analyses. Functional benefit was first noted at [≥] 50 EVTs, but centers performing [≥] 175 EVTs had substantially higher functional benefit (aOR 1.42, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates increased hospital case volume is associated with a modest improvement in favorable functional outcomes in patients undergoing EVT for AIS. Attempts to identify procedural cut off values reveal likely improved functional outcomes beginning at 50 EVT per year, while this benefit seems to increase with increasing case volumes. These higher levels of case volumes do not lead to higher rates of inpatient mortality or ICH. ?\",\"PeriodicalId\":506788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.04.24308466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.04.24308466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前的研究报告称,医院血管内血栓切除术(EVT)量越大,手术时间越短、血管再通率越高和功能预后越好之间存在正相关关系。我们利用 2016-2020 年全国住院患者样本(NIS)数据库调查了医院 EVT 量与临床预后之间的关系。研究方法对 NIS 进行横断面分析,研究医院 EVT 量与预后之间的关系。收集了所有相关的临床和人口统计学信息。结果包括良好的功能预后(无需协助即可回家)、住院患者死亡率和脑出血(ICH)。年EVT量排名前五分之一的中心被归类为高容量中心。我们进行了单变量、多变量、近邻匹配分析和探索性年病例量截止分析。结果显示样本中共有 114640 名患者接受了 EVT。其中,24415 人(21.3%)属于高病例量组。在单变量分析(OR 1.20,p < 0.001)、多变量分析(aOR 1.19,p = 0.003)和匹配分析(OR 1.14,p = 0.028)中,高容量中心的良好功能预后率更高。匹配前,住院患者死亡率较低(OR 0.83,p < 0.001)。然而,在单变量分析和匹配分析中,高容量中心和低容量中心之间没有差异。所有分析中的 ICH 均无差异。功能获益首次出现在[≥]50次EVT时,但进行[≥]175次EVT的中心的功能获益更高(aOR 1.42,p = 0.002)。结论:我们的分析表明,医院病例量的增加与接受EVT治疗的AIS患者良好功能预后的适度改善有关。在尝试确定程序临界值时发现,从每年 50 例 EVT 开始,功能预后可能会有所改善,而这种益处似乎会随着病例量的增加而增加。这些较高水平的病例量并不会导致较高的住院死亡率或 ICH 发生率。?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy Volume and Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A National Inpatient Sample Study
Background: Previous studies have reported a positive relationship between higher hospital endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) volume and shorter procedures, higher revascularization rates, and improved functional outcomes. We investigated the association between hospital EVT volume and clinical outcomes using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016-2020. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the NIS examining the relationship of hospital EVT volume and outcomes was performed. All relevant clinical and demographic information was collected. The outcomes were favorable functional outcome (home without assistance), inpatient mortality, and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Centers were classified as high-volume if they were in the top quintile of annual EVT volume. We performed univariate, multivariate, nearest neighbor matched analysis, and an exploratory annual case volume cutoff analysis. Results: There were 114,640 patients who underwent EVT included in the sample. Of these, 24,415 (21.3%) were in the high-volume group. High-volume centers had higher rates of favorable functional outcome in univariate (OR 1.20, p < 0.001), multivariate (aOR 1.19, p = 0.003), and matched analysis (OR 1.14, p = 0.028). Prior to matching, lower rates of inpatient mortality (OR 0.83, p < 0.001). However, in univariate and matched analysis there were no differences between high and low-volume centers. There were no differences in ICH across all analyses. Functional benefit was first noted at [≥] 50 EVTs, but centers performing [≥] 175 EVTs had substantially higher functional benefit (aOR 1.42, p = 0.002). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates increased hospital case volume is associated with a modest improvement in favorable functional outcomes in patients undergoing EVT for AIS. Attempts to identify procedural cut off values reveal likely improved functional outcomes beginning at 50 EVT per year, while this benefit seems to increase with increasing case volumes. These higher levels of case volumes do not lead to higher rates of inpatient mortality or ICH. ?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reemergence of Oropouche virus between 2023 and 2024 in Brazil Towards Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Management: A Thai Cohort Study on Polygenic Risk Scores Hot Spring Residency and Disease Association: a Crossover Gene-Environment Interaction (GxE) Study in Taiwan Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in renal cancer Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1