Case Report: The Conundrum of What to Pick? Antibiotic Susceptibility Variability in Burkholderia cenocepacia in Cystic Fibrosis: Implications for Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing and Treatment

Within cystic fibrosis microbiology, there is often mismatch between the antibiotic susceptibility result of an isolated bacterial pathogen and the clinical outcome, when the patient is treated with the same antibiotic. The reasoning for this remains largely elusive. Antibiotic susceptibility to four antibiotics (ceftazidime, meropenem, minocycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) was determined in consecutive isolates (n = 11) from an adult cystic fibrosis patient, over a 63 month period. Each isolate displayed its own unique resistotype. The first isolate was sensitive to all four antibiotics, in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology and interpretative criteria. Resistance was first detected at four months, showing resistance to ceftazidime and meropenen and intermediate resistance to minocycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Pan resistance was first detected at 18 months (resistotype IV), with three resistotypes (I, II and III) preceding this complete resistotype. The bacterium continued to display further antibiotic susceptibility heterogeneity for the next 45 months, with the description of an additional seven resistotypes (resistotypes V–XI). The Relative Resistance Index of this bacterium over the 63 month period showed no relationship between the development of antibiotic resistance and time. Adoption of mathematical modelling employing multinomial distribution demonstrated that large numbers of individual colony picks (>40/sputum), would be required to be 78% confident of capturing all 11 resistotypes present. Such a requirement for large numbers of colony picks combined with antibiotic susceptibility-related methodological problems creates a conundrum in biomedical science practice, in providing a robust assay that will capture antibiotic susceptibility variation, be pragmatic and cost-effective to deliver as a pathology service, but have the reliability to help clinicians select appropriate antibiotics for their patients. This study represents an advance in biomedical science as it demonstrates potential variability in antibiotic susceptibility testing with Burkholderia cenocepacia. Respiratory physicians and paediatricians need to be made aware of such variation by biomedical scientists at the bench, so that clinicians can contextualise the significance of the reported susceptibility result, when selecting appropriate antibiotics for their cystic fibrosis patient. Furthermore, consideration needs to be given in providing additional guidance on the laboratory report to highlight this heterogeneity to emphasise the potential for misalignment between susceptibility result and clinical outcome.