研究从 TORUS 同化地表、PBL 和自由大气观测数据对 2019 年 6 月 8 日两个超级暴风雪的分析和预测的影响

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Monthly Weather Review Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1175/mwr-d-23-0247.1
Matthew B. Wilson, A. Houston
{"title":"研究从 TORUS 同化地表、PBL 和自由大气观测数据对 2019 年 6 月 8 日两个超级暴风雪的分析和预测的影响","authors":"Matthew B. Wilson, A. Houston","doi":"10.1175/mwr-d-23-0247.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study describes data-denial experiments conducted to examine the impact of assimilating subsets of data from the TORUS project on storm-scale ensemble forecasts of two supercells on 8 June 2019. Assimilated data from TORUS includes mobile mesonet, UAS, and radiosonde observations. The TORUS data are divided into three spatial subsets to evaluate the importance of observing different parts of the atmosphere on forecasts of this case: the SFC subset consisting of just the near-surface mobile mesonet observations, the PBL subset consisting of UAS observations and radiosonde profiles below 762 m, and the FREE subset consisting of radiosonde profiles above 762 m. Data denial experiments are then conducted by comparing analyses and free forecasts generated using a cycled EnKF data assimilation system assimilating conventional observations, radar observations, and all of the TORUS observations at once with experiments where one of the three subsets is removed in turn as well as a control experiment assimilating only conventional and radar observations. Our results show that assimilating all of the TORUS observations at once in the ALL experiment improves the storm-scale ensemble forecasts much more often than it degrades them, and that no one subset of the TORUS data was consistently most important for improving the analyses or forecasts.","PeriodicalId":18824,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Weather Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Impact of Assimilating Surface, PBL, and Free Atmosphere Observations from TORUS on Analyses and Forecasts of Two Supercells on 8 June 2019\",\"authors\":\"Matthew B. Wilson, A. Houston\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/mwr-d-23-0247.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis study describes data-denial experiments conducted to examine the impact of assimilating subsets of data from the TORUS project on storm-scale ensemble forecasts of two supercells on 8 June 2019. Assimilated data from TORUS includes mobile mesonet, UAS, and radiosonde observations. The TORUS data are divided into three spatial subsets to evaluate the importance of observing different parts of the atmosphere on forecasts of this case: the SFC subset consisting of just the near-surface mobile mesonet observations, the PBL subset consisting of UAS observations and radiosonde profiles below 762 m, and the FREE subset consisting of radiosonde profiles above 762 m. Data denial experiments are then conducted by comparing analyses and free forecasts generated using a cycled EnKF data assimilation system assimilating conventional observations, radar observations, and all of the TORUS observations at once with experiments where one of the three subsets is removed in turn as well as a control experiment assimilating only conventional and radar observations. Our results show that assimilating all of the TORUS observations at once in the ALL experiment improves the storm-scale ensemble forecasts much more often than it degrades them, and that no one subset of the TORUS data was consistently most important for improving the analyses or forecasts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monthly Weather Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0247.1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Weather Review","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0247.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究介绍了为检验 TORUS 项目的数据同化子集对 2019 年 6 月 8 日两个超级暴风圈的风暴尺度集合预报的影响而进行的数据拒绝实验。TORUS 项目的同化数据包括移动介观网、无人机系统和无线电探空仪观测数据。TORUS 数据分为三个空间子集,以评估观测大气层不同部分对该案例预报的重要性:SFC 子集仅包括近地面移动介子网观测数据,PBL 子集包括 UAS 观测数据和 762 米以下的无线电探空仪剖面数据,FREE 子集包括 762 米以上的无线电探空仪剖面数据。然后进行了数据拒绝实验,比较了使用同时同化常规观测数据、雷达观测数据和所有 TORUS 观测数据的循环 EnKF 数据同化系统生成的分析和自由预报,以及依次去除三个子集之一的实验和仅同化常规观测数据和雷达观测数据的对照实验。我们的结果表明,在 ALL 试验中,同时同化所有 TORUS 观测数据对风暴尺度集合预报的改善程度远远大于对预报的降低程度,没有一个 TORUS 数据子集对改善分析或预报始终是最重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Impact of Assimilating Surface, PBL, and Free Atmosphere Observations from TORUS on Analyses and Forecasts of Two Supercells on 8 June 2019
This study describes data-denial experiments conducted to examine the impact of assimilating subsets of data from the TORUS project on storm-scale ensemble forecasts of two supercells on 8 June 2019. Assimilated data from TORUS includes mobile mesonet, UAS, and radiosonde observations. The TORUS data are divided into three spatial subsets to evaluate the importance of observing different parts of the atmosphere on forecasts of this case: the SFC subset consisting of just the near-surface mobile mesonet observations, the PBL subset consisting of UAS observations and radiosonde profiles below 762 m, and the FREE subset consisting of radiosonde profiles above 762 m. Data denial experiments are then conducted by comparing analyses and free forecasts generated using a cycled EnKF data assimilation system assimilating conventional observations, radar observations, and all of the TORUS observations at once with experiments where one of the three subsets is removed in turn as well as a control experiment assimilating only conventional and radar observations. Our results show that assimilating all of the TORUS observations at once in the ALL experiment improves the storm-scale ensemble forecasts much more often than it degrades them, and that no one subset of the TORUS data was consistently most important for improving the analyses or forecasts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monthly Weather Review
Monthly Weather Review 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Monthly Weather Review (MWR) (ISSN: 0027-0644; eISSN: 1520-0493) publishes research relevant to the analysis and prediction of observed atmospheric circulations and physics, including technique development, data assimilation, model validation, and relevant case studies. This research includes numerical and data assimilation techniques that apply to the atmosphere and/or ocean environments. MWR also addresses phenomena having seasonal and subseasonal time scales.
期刊最新文献
Radar-derived Convective Features and Atmospheric Environments of Hail-Producing Storms over the Contiguous United States Clustering Anomalous Circulations and Their Implications on the Prediction of Minimum 2m Air Temperature over Northeastern China during Winter An implementation of the particle flow filter in an atmospheric model A priori test of scale-similarity parameterizations for subgrid-scale fluxes in convective storms Examining Outer Band Supercell Environments in Landfalling Tropical Cyclones using Ground-Based Radar Analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1