北极阿拉斯加狼獾的种群密度和家园范围大小

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Journal of Wildlife Management Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1002/jwmg.22600
Thomas W. Glass, Martin D. Robards
{"title":"北极阿拉斯加狼獾的种群密度和家园范围大小","authors":"Thomas W. Glass,&nbsp;Martin D. Robards","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines (<i>Gulo gulo</i>) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelated, threats resulting from anthropogenic changes in their environment. Previous population density estimates for wolverines in the Arctic range tenfold, from the lowest to highest available for the species, limiting their utility outside the specific areas and times they were derived. The most recent density estimate in Arctic Alaska, USA, was produced 4 decades ago and was derived from a relatively small study area. We evaluated wolverine population density and home range size across the North Slope of Alaska during 2017–2022 using global positioning system (GPS)-based collar data and spatial capture-recapture models. Population density estimates were 2.0 individuals/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> (95% credible interval = 1.3–3.5) in 2018 and 2.8 individuals/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> (95% credible interval = 1.7–3.5) in 2021. Median home range sizes modeled with autocorrelated kernel density estimators and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck foraging movement processes were 699 km<sup>2</sup> (range = 158–2,895 km<sup>2</sup>) among 12 females and 2,332 km<sup>2</sup> (range = 797–4,699 km<sup>2</sup>) among 10 males. These population density estimates are nearly 10 times lower than the previous estimate for Arctic Alaska. We recommend incorporating this information into management strategies to ensure sustainable harvest, particularly as the region's remote areas are more efficiently accessed by hunters and are being considered for transportation corridors supporting new industrial development.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska\",\"authors\":\"Thomas W. Glass,&nbsp;Martin D. Robards\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.22600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines (<i>Gulo gulo</i>) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelated, threats resulting from anthropogenic changes in their environment. Previous population density estimates for wolverines in the Arctic range tenfold, from the lowest to highest available for the species, limiting their utility outside the specific areas and times they were derived. The most recent density estimate in Arctic Alaska, USA, was produced 4 decades ago and was derived from a relatively small study area. We evaluated wolverine population density and home range size across the North Slope of Alaska during 2017–2022 using global positioning system (GPS)-based collar data and spatial capture-recapture models. Population density estimates were 2.0 individuals/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> (95% credible interval = 1.3–3.5) in 2018 and 2.8 individuals/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> (95% credible interval = 1.7–3.5) in 2021. Median home range sizes modeled with autocorrelated kernel density estimators and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck foraging movement processes were 699 km<sup>2</sup> (range = 158–2,895 km<sup>2</sup>) among 12 females and 2,332 km<sup>2</sup> (range = 797–4,699 km<sup>2</sup>) among 10 males. These population density estimates are nearly 10 times lower than the previous estimate for Arctic Alaska. We recommend incorporating this information into management strategies to ensure sustainable harvest, particularly as the region's remote areas are more efficiently accessed by hunters and are being considered for transportation corridors supporting new industrial development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22600\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解被开发的野生动物物种的空间需求,包括种群密度和家园范围大小,对于野生动物管理和保护非常重要。狼獾(Gulo gulo)在整个北极地区被猎杀和诱捕,很容易受到环境人为变化造成的众多威胁,这些威胁往往是相互关联的。以往对北极地区貂熊种群密度的估计值相差十倍,从最低到最高不等,限制了它们在特定地区和时间之外的实用性。美国阿拉斯加北极地区的最新密度估计值是在 40 年前得出的,并且是在一个相对较小的研究区域内得出的。我们利用基于全球定位系统(GPS)的项圈数据和空间捕获-再捕获模型,评估了 2017-2022 年阿拉斯加北坡狼獾的种群密度和家园范围大小。2018 年的种群密度估计值为 2.0 只/1,000 平方公里(95% 可信区间 = 1.3-3.5),2021 年为 2.8 只/1,000 平方公里(95% 可信区间 = 1.7-3.5)。用自相关核密度估算器和奥恩斯坦-乌伦贝克觅食运动过程模拟的中位家园范围大小为:12 只雌性为 699 平方公里(范围 = 158-2,895 平方公里),10 只雄性为 2,332 平方公里(范围 = 797-4,699 平方公里)。这些种群密度估计值比之前对阿拉斯加北极地区的估计值低近 10 倍。我们建议将这些信息纳入管理策略,以确保可持续的收获,特别是当猎人更有效地进入该地区的偏远地区,并考虑将其作为支持新工业发展的交通走廊时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wolverine population density and home range size in Arctic Alaska

Understanding the spatial requirements of exploited wildlife species, including population density and home range size, is important for wildlife management and conservation. Wolverines (Gulo gulo) are hunted and trapped across the Arctic, and are vulnerable to numerous, often interrelated, threats resulting from anthropogenic changes in their environment. Previous population density estimates for wolverines in the Arctic range tenfold, from the lowest to highest available for the species, limiting their utility outside the specific areas and times they were derived. The most recent density estimate in Arctic Alaska, USA, was produced 4 decades ago and was derived from a relatively small study area. We evaluated wolverine population density and home range size across the North Slope of Alaska during 2017–2022 using global positioning system (GPS)-based collar data and spatial capture-recapture models. Population density estimates were 2.0 individuals/1,000 km2 (95% credible interval = 1.3–3.5) in 2018 and 2.8 individuals/1,000 km2 (95% credible interval = 1.7–3.5) in 2021. Median home range sizes modeled with autocorrelated kernel density estimators and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck foraging movement processes were 699 km2 (range = 158–2,895 km2) among 12 females and 2,332 km2 (range = 797–4,699 km2) among 10 males. These population density estimates are nearly 10 times lower than the previous estimate for Arctic Alaska. We recommend incorporating this information into management strategies to ensure sustainable harvest, particularly as the region's remote areas are more efficiently accessed by hunters and are being considered for transportation corridors supporting new industrial development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
期刊最新文献
Free‐roaming horses exceeding appropriate management levels affect multiple vital rates in greater sage‐grouse Sexual Segregation in Ungulates: Ecology, Behavior, and ConservationBy R. TerryBowyer, Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins University Press. 2022. pp. 200. $74.99 (hardcover). ISBN: 9781421445069 Efficacy of non‐lead ammunition distribution programs to offset fatalities of golden eagles in southeast Wyoming Identifying temperature refuges in Utah using temperature, biota, and habitat data Annual variation in attribute importance to upland game hunter satisfaction in Nebraska
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1