理解人工智能对慈善捐赠公正性的影响:信任和监管导向的调节作用

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-06-02 DOI:10.1002/cb.2365
Chen Yang, Yi Yang, Yuezi Zhang
{"title":"理解人工智能对慈善捐赠公正性的影响:信任和监管导向的调节作用","authors":"Chen Yang,&nbsp;Yi Yang,&nbsp;Yuezi Zhang","doi":"10.1002/cb.2365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The issue of distributive justice in charitable donations has become increasingly prominent. It not only weakens people's confidence in philanthropy but also their enthusiasm for participation. With the widespread use of artificial intelligence technology in donations, a key question arises: Can artificial intelligence inspire people to be more willing to donate by improving their perception of justice in donation distribution? This question is vital for charities but has yet to be answered. To address this gap, this research conducted five comprehensive studies to investigate the impact of AI decision-makers on consumers' willingness to donate. The findings of Studies 1 and 2 consistently revealed that consumers perceive higher distributive justice in AI decision-makers compared with humans, motivating increased participation in charitable donations. Study 3 examined two different experimental scenarios and found that this effect only occurs among consumers with lower trust in nonprofit organizations. Study 4 further explored the effect that is only present among prevention-oriented consumers. These findings reveal how perceptions of distributive justice toward AI decision-makers can facilitate public charitable giving and highlight the significance of this effect across different groups of consumers, providing invaluable insights for charitable organizations. This research not only fills the theoretical gap in the philanthropic field about the impact of artificial intelligence decision-makers on donation distribution justice but also provides charitable organizations with artificial intelligence-based donation promotion strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","volume":"23 5","pages":"2624-2636"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on the justice of charitable giving: The moderating role of trust and regulatory orientation\",\"authors\":\"Chen Yang,&nbsp;Yi Yang,&nbsp;Yuezi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cb.2365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The issue of distributive justice in charitable donations has become increasingly prominent. It not only weakens people's confidence in philanthropy but also their enthusiasm for participation. With the widespread use of artificial intelligence technology in donations, a key question arises: Can artificial intelligence inspire people to be more willing to donate by improving their perception of justice in donation distribution? This question is vital for charities but has yet to be answered. To address this gap, this research conducted five comprehensive studies to investigate the impact of AI decision-makers on consumers' willingness to donate. The findings of Studies 1 and 2 consistently revealed that consumers perceive higher distributive justice in AI decision-makers compared with humans, motivating increased participation in charitable donations. Study 3 examined two different experimental scenarios and found that this effect only occurs among consumers with lower trust in nonprofit organizations. Study 4 further explored the effect that is only present among prevention-oriented consumers. These findings reveal how perceptions of distributive justice toward AI decision-makers can facilitate public charitable giving and highlight the significance of this effect across different groups of consumers, providing invaluable insights for charitable organizations. This research not only fills the theoretical gap in the philanthropic field about the impact of artificial intelligence decision-makers on donation distribution justice but also provides charitable organizations with artificial intelligence-based donation promotion strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Behaviour\",\"volume\":\"23 5\",\"pages\":\"2624-2636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Behaviour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2365\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cb.2365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慈善捐赠中的分配公正问题日益突出。它不仅削弱了人们对慈善事业的信心,也削弱了人们参与慈善事业的热情。随着人工智能技术在捐赠领域的广泛应用,一个关键问题随之而来:人工智能能否通过改善人们对捐赠分配公正性的感知,激发他们的捐赠意愿?这个问题对慈善机构至关重要,但至今尚未找到答案。为了填补这一空白,本研究开展了五项综合研究,调查人工智能决策者对消费者捐赠意愿的影响。研究 1 和研究 2 的结果一致显示,与人类相比,消费者在人工智能决策者身上感知到更高的分配正义,从而促使更多的人参与慈善捐赠。研究 3 考察了两种不同的实验场景,发现这种效应只发生在对非营利组织信任度较低的消费者身上。研究 4 进一步探讨了只有以预防为导向的消费者才会产生这种效应。这些发现揭示了对人工智能决策者的分配正义感如何促进公众慈善捐赠,并强调了这种效应在不同消费者群体中的重要性,为慈善组织提供了宝贵的启示。这项研究不仅填补了慈善领域关于人工智能决策者对捐赠分配公正性影响的理论空白,也为慈善组织提供了基于人工智能的捐赠促进策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on the justice of charitable giving: The moderating role of trust and regulatory orientation

The issue of distributive justice in charitable donations has become increasingly prominent. It not only weakens people's confidence in philanthropy but also their enthusiasm for participation. With the widespread use of artificial intelligence technology in donations, a key question arises: Can artificial intelligence inspire people to be more willing to donate by improving their perception of justice in donation distribution? This question is vital for charities but has yet to be answered. To address this gap, this research conducted five comprehensive studies to investigate the impact of AI decision-makers on consumers' willingness to donate. The findings of Studies 1 and 2 consistently revealed that consumers perceive higher distributive justice in AI decision-makers compared with humans, motivating increased participation in charitable donations. Study 3 examined two different experimental scenarios and found that this effect only occurs among consumers with lower trust in nonprofit organizations. Study 4 further explored the effect that is only present among prevention-oriented consumers. These findings reveal how perceptions of distributive justice toward AI decision-makers can facilitate public charitable giving and highlight the significance of this effect across different groups of consumers, providing invaluable insights for charitable organizations. This research not only fills the theoretical gap in the philanthropic field about the impact of artificial intelligence decision-makers on donation distribution justice but also provides charitable organizations with artificial intelligence-based donation promotion strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.60%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Consumer Behaviour aims to promote the understanding of consumer behaviour, consumer research and consumption through the publication of double-blind peer-reviewed, top quality theoretical and empirical research. An international academic journal with a foundation in the social sciences, the JCB has a diverse and multidisciplinary outlook which seeks to showcase innovative, alternative and contested representations of consumer behaviour alongside the latest developments in established traditions of consumer research.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Omni-channel customer segmentation: A personalized customer journey perspective Service-dominant logic and customer engagement based value proposition framework in peer-to-peer accommodation: A two-study approach Decoding millennials and generation Z consumers' brand behaviors in the Metaverse: The relationships among avatar identification, self‐presence, and psychological dynamics Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1