{"title":"评估铁的状况。","authors":"Ann Von Holle","doi":"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Iron is an essential trace element in human health that can be harmful at abnormal levels such as iron overload or deficiency. Measured iron status in the body can depend on health outcomes experienced by the individual and this can complicate its accurate assessment. This review will highlight recent research on iron assessment in the literature.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research on iron assessment within the past 18 months included some common themes spanning new methods and biomarkers, as well as existing problems in assessing iron deficiency and overload. Heterogeneity in associations between inflammation and iron levels are reflected across different inflammatory biomarkers. New methods relevant to low- and high-resource settings may improve assessment in tissues with iron deficiency and overload. Consensus papers outlined best practices when using MRI to assess iron status. Outside of newer methods, traditional serum markers are the subject of a call for updated guidance when assessing iron status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Research continues on the topic of iron assessment, underlying its complex metabolism in the body and resulting challenges in assessment. Current literature underscores progress to make iron assessment more accessible, improve existing methods, and update current assessment methods so they correspond with recent research to improve human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":10962,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370657/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of iron status.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Von Holle\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCO.0000000000001050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Iron is an essential trace element in human health that can be harmful at abnormal levels such as iron overload or deficiency. Measured iron status in the body can depend on health outcomes experienced by the individual and this can complicate its accurate assessment. This review will highlight recent research on iron assessment in the literature.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Research on iron assessment within the past 18 months included some common themes spanning new methods and biomarkers, as well as existing problems in assessing iron deficiency and overload. Heterogeneity in associations between inflammation and iron levels are reflected across different inflammatory biomarkers. New methods relevant to low- and high-resource settings may improve assessment in tissues with iron deficiency and overload. Consensus papers outlined best practices when using MRI to assess iron status. Outside of newer methods, traditional serum markers are the subject of a call for updated guidance when assessing iron status.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Research continues on the topic of iron assessment, underlying its complex metabolism in the body and resulting challenges in assessment. Current literature underscores progress to make iron assessment more accessible, improve existing methods, and update current assessment methods so they correspond with recent research to improve human health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370657/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0000000000001050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose of review: Iron is an essential trace element in human health that can be harmful at abnormal levels such as iron overload or deficiency. Measured iron status in the body can depend on health outcomes experienced by the individual and this can complicate its accurate assessment. This review will highlight recent research on iron assessment in the literature.
Recent findings: Research on iron assessment within the past 18 months included some common themes spanning new methods and biomarkers, as well as existing problems in assessing iron deficiency and overload. Heterogeneity in associations between inflammation and iron levels are reflected across different inflammatory biomarkers. New methods relevant to low- and high-resource settings may improve assessment in tissues with iron deficiency and overload. Consensus papers outlined best practices when using MRI to assess iron status. Outside of newer methods, traditional serum markers are the subject of a call for updated guidance when assessing iron status.
Summary: Research continues on the topic of iron assessment, underlying its complex metabolism in the body and resulting challenges in assessment. Current literature underscores progress to make iron assessment more accessible, improve existing methods, and update current assessment methods so they correspond with recent research to improve human health.
期刊介绍:
A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of clinical nutrition and metabolic care. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include protein, amino acid metabolism and therapy, lipid metabolism and therapy, nutrition and the intensive care unit and carbohydrates. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.