替代方法和结构假设对成本效益分析结果的影响:印度三项经济评估的经验证据。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-04 DOI:10.4103/ijph.ijph_315_23
Deepshikha Sharma, Arun Kumar Aggarwal, Pankaj Bahuguna, Shankar Prinja
{"title":"替代方法和结构假设对成本效益分析结果的影响:印度三项经济评估的经验证据。","authors":"Deepshikha Sharma, Arun Kumar Aggarwal, Pankaj Bahuguna, Shankar Prinja","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_315_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancement in methods and application of economic evaluations (EEs), there are several uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of alternate methodological and structural assumptions for four key principles of EE, on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three previously published model-based EEs were used: (1) Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCIs) intervention; (2) intervention for multiple myeloma, and (3) safety-engineered syringes (SES) intervention. A series of empirical analyses was undertaken to assess the impact of alternate assumptions for discount-rate, time-horizon, study perspective, and health outcome measure, on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and interpretation of cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing discount rate resulted in an increase in ICERs, for all three case-studies; however, there was no change in the conclusions. Using shorter time-horizons resulted in a significant increase in ICERs, the multiple myeloma intervention remained cost-ineffective, SES intervention became cost-ineffective, whereas IMNCI intervention remained cost-effective, despite a three-fold increase in ICER. On using disability adjusted life years instead of quality adjusted life years, ICERs increased to 0.04, 2 and 4 times for SES, IMNCI and multiple myeloma interventions, respectively. On analyzing results from a societal perspective, a decline in ICERs was observed. The decline was significant for IMNCI where the intervention turned dominant/cost-saving. In the other two case-studies decline in ICERs was modest, 32% for multiple myeloma, and 4% for SES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a significant impact of using alternate assumptions on ICERs which can potentially impact resource-allocation decisions. Our findings provide strong argument in favor of standardization of processes and development of country-specific guidelines for conduct of EE.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"68 1","pages":"9-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Alternate Methodological and Structural Assumptions on Results of Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Empirical Evidence using Three Indian Economic Evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Deepshikha Sharma, Arun Kumar Aggarwal, Pankaj Bahuguna, Shankar Prinja\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijph.ijph_315_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancement in methods and application of economic evaluations (EEs), there are several uncertainties.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the impact of alternate methodological and structural assumptions for four key principles of EE, on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three previously published model-based EEs were used: (1) Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCIs) intervention; (2) intervention for multiple myeloma, and (3) safety-engineered syringes (SES) intervention. A series of empirical analyses was undertaken to assess the impact of alternate assumptions for discount-rate, time-horizon, study perspective, and health outcome measure, on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and interpretation of cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing discount rate resulted in an increase in ICERs, for all three case-studies; however, there was no change in the conclusions. Using shorter time-horizons resulted in a significant increase in ICERs, the multiple myeloma intervention remained cost-ineffective, SES intervention became cost-ineffective, whereas IMNCI intervention remained cost-effective, despite a three-fold increase in ICER. On using disability adjusted life years instead of quality adjusted life years, ICERs increased to 0.04, 2 and 4 times for SES, IMNCI and multiple myeloma interventions, respectively. On analyzing results from a societal perspective, a decline in ICERs was observed. The decline was significant for IMNCI where the intervention turned dominant/cost-saving. In the other two case-studies decline in ICERs was modest, 32% for multiple myeloma, and 4% for SES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We observed a significant impact of using alternate assumptions on ICERs which can potentially impact resource-allocation decisions. Our findings provide strong argument in favor of standardization of processes and development of country-specific guidelines for conduct of EE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"9-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_315_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_315_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管经济评价(EE)的方法和应用取得了进步,但仍存在一些不确定性:评估经济评价四项关键原则的方法和结构假设对成本效益分析结果的影响:材料和方法:使用了三个先前公布的基于模型的环境教育:(1) 新生儿和儿童疾病综合管理 (IMNCIs) 干预;(2) 多发性骨髓瘤干预;(3) 安全工程注射器 (SES) 干预。研究人员进行了一系列实证分析,以评估贴现率、时间跨度、研究视角和健康结果衡量标准等不同假设对增量成本效益比(ICER)和成本效益解释的影响:在所有三项案例研究中,提高贴现率会导致 ICER 增加;但结论没有变化。使用较短的时间尺度会导致 ICER 显著增加,多发性骨髓瘤干预措施仍然不具成本效益,SES 干预措施变得不具成本效益,而 IMNCI 干预措施尽管 ICER 增加了三倍,但仍然具有成本效益。如果使用残疾调整生命年而不是质量调整生命年,SES、IMNCI 和多发性骨髓瘤干预措施的 ICER 分别增加到 0.04、2 和 4 倍。从社会角度分析结果发现,ICER 有所下降。IMNCI的下降幅度很大,因为该干预措施变成了占主导地位/节约成本的干预措施。在其他两个案例研究中,ICER 的下降幅度不大,多发性骨髓瘤为 32%,SES 为 4%:我们观察到,使用替代假设对 ICER 有重大影响,可能会影响资源分配决策。我们的研究结果为开展 EE 提供了强有力的论据,支持流程标准化和制定针对具体国家的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Alternate Methodological and Structural Assumptions on Results of Cost-effectiveness Analysis: Empirical Evidence using Three Indian Economic Evaluations.

Background: Despite advancement in methods and application of economic evaluations (EEs), there are several uncertainties.

Objectives: To assess the impact of alternate methodological and structural assumptions for four key principles of EE, on the results of cost-effectiveness analysis.

Materials and methods: Three previously published model-based EEs were used: (1) Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCIs) intervention; (2) intervention for multiple myeloma, and (3) safety-engineered syringes (SES) intervention. A series of empirical analyses was undertaken to assess the impact of alternate assumptions for discount-rate, time-horizon, study perspective, and health outcome measure, on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and interpretation of cost-effectiveness.

Results: Increasing discount rate resulted in an increase in ICERs, for all three case-studies; however, there was no change in the conclusions. Using shorter time-horizons resulted in a significant increase in ICERs, the multiple myeloma intervention remained cost-ineffective, SES intervention became cost-ineffective, whereas IMNCI intervention remained cost-effective, despite a three-fold increase in ICER. On using disability adjusted life years instead of quality adjusted life years, ICERs increased to 0.04, 2 and 4 times for SES, IMNCI and multiple myeloma interventions, respectively. On analyzing results from a societal perspective, a decline in ICERs was observed. The decline was significant for IMNCI where the intervention turned dominant/cost-saving. In the other two case-studies decline in ICERs was modest, 32% for multiple myeloma, and 4% for SES.

Conclusion: We observed a significant impact of using alternate assumptions on ICERs which can potentially impact resource-allocation decisions. Our findings provide strong argument in favor of standardization of processes and development of country-specific guidelines for conduct of EE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
期刊最新文献
Severe Pneumonia and Cytomegalovirus Coinfection in Infants with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Social and Cultural Influences on Genetic Counseling Acceptability: A Mixed-Methods Study on Beta-Thalassemia Carriers Among Graduate Students in West Bengal, India. Time to Revisit COTPA as Herbs Become Perilous. Training Needs Assessment Should Be Introduced as a Competency for Postgraduate Training in Community Medicine in India. "Fit India Movement" Promotes WHO's Physical Activity Recommendations: Some Issues to Consider.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1