Avital R. Wulz , Gabrielle F. Miller , Lindsay Hicks , Amy F. Wolkin
{"title":"社会脆弱性因素与凶杀率和自杀率之间的关联 - 美国,2016 - 2020年","authors":"Avital R. Wulz , Gabrielle F. Miller , Lindsay Hicks , Amy F. Wolkin","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background:</em> Differences in social and environmental factors contribute to disparities in fatal injury rates. This study assessed the relationship between social vulnerability and homicide and suicide rates across United States counties. <em>Methods:</em> County-level age-adjusted homicide and suicide rates for 2016–2020 were linked with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2020 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a dataset identifying socially vulnerable communities. We conducted negative binomial regressions to examine the association between SVI and homicide and suicide rates, overall and by Census region/division. We mapped county-level data for SVI and homicide and suicide rates in bivariate choropleth maps. <em>Results:</em> Overall SVI was associated with homicide rates across U.S. counties. While no association was found for overall SVI and suicide rates, Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status domains were associated. The geographic distribution of SVI and homicide and suicide rates varied spatially; notably, counties in the South had the greatest levels of social vulnerability and greatest homicide rates. <em>Conclusions:</em> Our findings demonstrate county-level social vulnerability is associated with homicide rates but may be more nuanced for suicide rates. A modified SVI for injury should include additional social and structural determinants and exclude variables not applicable to injuries. <em>Practical Applications:</em> This study combines the SVI with homicide and suicide data, enabling researchers to examine related social and environmental factors. Modifying the SVI to include relevant predictors could improve injury prevention strategies by prioritizing efforts in areas with high social vulnerability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between social vulnerability factors and homicide and suicide rates - United States, 2016 - 2020\",\"authors\":\"Avital R. Wulz , Gabrielle F. Miller , Lindsay Hicks , Amy F. Wolkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.05.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Background:</em> Differences in social and environmental factors contribute to disparities in fatal injury rates. This study assessed the relationship between social vulnerability and homicide and suicide rates across United States counties. <em>Methods:</em> County-level age-adjusted homicide and suicide rates for 2016–2020 were linked with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2020 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a dataset identifying socially vulnerable communities. We conducted negative binomial regressions to examine the association between SVI and homicide and suicide rates, overall and by Census region/division. We mapped county-level data for SVI and homicide and suicide rates in bivariate choropleth maps. <em>Results:</em> Overall SVI was associated with homicide rates across U.S. counties. While no association was found for overall SVI and suicide rates, Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status domains were associated. The geographic distribution of SVI and homicide and suicide rates varied spatially; notably, counties in the South had the greatest levels of social vulnerability and greatest homicide rates. <em>Conclusions:</em> Our findings demonstrate county-level social vulnerability is associated with homicide rates but may be more nuanced for suicide rates. A modified SVI for injury should include additional social and structural determinants and exclude variables not applicable to injuries. <em>Practical Applications:</em> This study combines the SVI with homicide and suicide data, enabling researchers to examine related social and environmental factors. Modifying the SVI to include relevant predictors could improve injury prevention strategies by prioritizing efforts in areas with high social vulnerability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Safety Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000653\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524000653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:社会和环境因素的差异导致了致命伤害率的差异。本研究评估了美国各县的社会脆弱性与凶杀和自杀率之间的关系。研究方法将 2016-2020 年县级年龄调整后的杀人率和自杀率与美国疾病控制和预防中心的 2020 年社会脆弱性指数(SVI)数据联系起来,SVI 是一个识别社会弱势社区的数据集。我们进行了负二项回归,以研究 SVI 与凶杀率和自杀率之间的关联,包括总体关联和人口普查地区/分区关联。我们将 SVI 与凶杀率和自杀率的县级数据绘制成了二维纵横图。结果:美国各县的总体 SVI 与凶杀率相关。虽然未发现总体 SVI 与自杀率存在关联,但社会经济地位和种族及amp; 少数族裔地位域存在关联。SVI 与凶杀率和自杀率的地理分布在空间上存在差异;值得注意的是,南部各县的社会脆弱性水平最高,凶杀率也最高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,县级社会脆弱性与凶杀率有关,但与自杀率的关系可能更为微妙。修改后的伤害 SVI 应包括更多的社会和结构决定因素,并排除不适用于伤害的变量。实际应用:本研究将 SVI 与凶杀和自杀数据相结合,使研究人员能够研究相关的社会和环境因素。修改 SVI 以纳入相关预测因素,可以改进伤害预防策略,优先考虑社会脆弱性高的地区。
Association between social vulnerability factors and homicide and suicide rates - United States, 2016 - 2020
Background: Differences in social and environmental factors contribute to disparities in fatal injury rates. This study assessed the relationship between social vulnerability and homicide and suicide rates across United States counties. Methods: County-level age-adjusted homicide and suicide rates for 2016–2020 were linked with data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2020 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a dataset identifying socially vulnerable communities. We conducted negative binomial regressions to examine the association between SVI and homicide and suicide rates, overall and by Census region/division. We mapped county-level data for SVI and homicide and suicide rates in bivariate choropleth maps. Results: Overall SVI was associated with homicide rates across U.S. counties. While no association was found for overall SVI and suicide rates, Socioeconomic Status and Racial & Ethnic Minority Status domains were associated. The geographic distribution of SVI and homicide and suicide rates varied spatially; notably, counties in the South had the greatest levels of social vulnerability and greatest homicide rates. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate county-level social vulnerability is associated with homicide rates but may be more nuanced for suicide rates. A modified SVI for injury should include additional social and structural determinants and exclude variables not applicable to injuries. Practical Applications: This study combines the SVI with homicide and suicide data, enabling researchers to examine related social and environmental factors. Modifying the SVI to include relevant predictors could improve injury prevention strategies by prioritizing efforts in areas with high social vulnerability.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).