分析未来遗传咨询专业学生遇到的经济障碍。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101175
{"title":"分析未来遗传咨询专业学生遇到的经济障碍。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>High costs of applying to genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) are likely a barrier to workforce diversification. We sought to determine application costs and assess differences between individuals of historically underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds in medicine (hURM) and non-hURM applicants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Applicants to GCGPs between 2005 to 2020 were surveyed about application history, related expenses, volunteer hours, and financial resources; 383 responses were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median total application costs (MTAC) were $2634, $4762, and $5607 (1, 2, and 3 or more application cycles, respectively). Interview-related items (which includes travel) had the highest median cost (1 application cycle: $879). Among those who applied to multiple cycles, hURM respondents had higher MTAC than those of non-hURM ($6713 versus $4762, <em>P</em> = .03) and lower median total volunteer hours (246 versus 381, <em>P</em> = .03). Parental education level differed by hURM status (<em>P</em> = .04). Median financial contribution from parents with and without advanced degrees varied significantly (60% versus 2%, <em>P</em> = .0009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Significant costs are incurred during the GCGP application process, but notable differences in costs and resources were observed between hURM and non-hURM applicants. Stakeholders within the profession should implement strategies to reduce financial barriers and the resulting inequities in the application process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 11","pages":"Article 101175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001096/pdfft?md5=f54e71c8ac9c64ea336279682b614e38&pid=1-s2.0-S1098360024001096-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of financial barriers experienced by prospective genetic counseling students\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>High costs of applying to genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) are likely a barrier to workforce diversification. We sought to determine application costs and assess differences between individuals of historically underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds in medicine (hURM) and non-hURM applicants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Applicants to GCGPs between 2005 to 2020 were surveyed about application history, related expenses, volunteer hours, and financial resources; 383 responses were analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median total application costs (MTAC) were $2634, $4762, and $5607 (1, 2, and 3 or more application cycles, respectively). Interview-related items (which includes travel) had the highest median cost (1 application cycle: $879). Among those who applied to multiple cycles, hURM respondents had higher MTAC than those of non-hURM ($6713 versus $4762, <em>P</em> = .03) and lower median total volunteer hours (246 versus 381, <em>P</em> = .03). Parental education level differed by hURM status (<em>P</em> = .04). Median financial contribution from parents with and without advanced degrees varied significantly (60% versus 2%, <em>P</em> = .0009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Significant costs are incurred during the GCGP application process, but notable differences in costs and resources were observed between hURM and non-hURM applicants. Stakeholders within the profession should implement strategies to reduce financial barriers and the resulting inequities in the application process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 101175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001096/pdfft?md5=f54e71c8ac9c64ea336279682b614e38&pid=1-s2.0-S1098360024001096-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001096\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001096","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:申请遗传咨询研究生项目(GCGPs)的高昂费用可能是劳动力多样化的一个障碍。我们试图确定申请费用,并评估在医学界历来代表性不足的种族和民族背景的个人(hURM)与非 hURM 申请者之间的差异:我们对 2005-2020 年间的 GCGP 申请人进行了调查,内容包括申请历史、相关费用、志愿服务时间和财务资源;我们对 383 份回复进行了分析:申请总费用(MTAC)的中位数分别为 2,634 美元、4,762 美元和 5,607 美元(分别为一个、两个和三个或更多申请周期)。面试相关项目(包括差旅)的费用中位数最高(一个申请周期:879 美元)。在申请多个周期的受访者中,居家养老计划受访者的中位数比非居家养老计划受访者高(6713 美元对 4762 美元,p=0.03),总志愿服务时数的中位数也较低(246 小时对 381 小时,p=0.03)。父母的教育水平因 "自愿者 "身份而异(p=0.04)。有高学历和没有高学历的父母的经济贡献中位数差别很大(60% 对 2%,p=0.0009):结论:在申请 GCGP 的过程中会产生大量的费用,但我们观察到,居权证申请者和非居权证申请者在费用和资源方面存在明显差异。行业内的利益相关者应实施策略,减少申请过程中的经济障碍和由此产生的不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of financial barriers experienced by prospective genetic counseling students

Purpose

High costs of applying to genetic counseling graduate programs (GCGPs) are likely a barrier to workforce diversification. We sought to determine application costs and assess differences between individuals of historically underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds in medicine (hURM) and non-hURM applicants.

Methods

Applicants to GCGPs between 2005 to 2020 were surveyed about application history, related expenses, volunteer hours, and financial resources; 383 responses were analyzed.

Results

Median total application costs (MTAC) were $2634, $4762, and $5607 (1, 2, and 3 or more application cycles, respectively). Interview-related items (which includes travel) had the highest median cost (1 application cycle: $879). Among those who applied to multiple cycles, hURM respondents had higher MTAC than those of non-hURM ($6713 versus $4762, P = .03) and lower median total volunteer hours (246 versus 381, P = .03). Parental education level differed by hURM status (P = .04). Median financial contribution from parents with and without advanced degrees varied significantly (60% versus 2%, P = .0009).

Conclusion

Significant costs are incurred during the GCGP application process, but notable differences in costs and resources were observed between hURM and non-hURM applicants. Stakeholders within the profession should implement strategies to reduce financial barriers and the resulting inequities in the application process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
The "Genetic Test Request": A genomic stewardship intervention for inpatient exome and genome orders at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Payer Perspectives on Genomic Testing in the United States: A systematic literature review. Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: family decision-making and outcomes. Upregulation vs. loss of function of NTRK2 in 44 affected individuals leads to two distinct neurodevelopmental disorders. Correspondence on "Weighty matters: Considering the ethics of genetic risk scores for obesity" by C. Houtz.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1