Craig D. L. Smith BSc, Alex D. McMahon PhD, Donald M. Lyall PhD, Mariel Goulart MSc, Gareth J. Inman PhD, Al Ross PhD, Mark Gormley PhD, Tom Dudding PhD, Gary J. Macfarlane PhD, Max Robinson PhD, Lorenzo Richiardi PhD, Diego Serraino PhD, Jerry Polesel PhD, Cristina Canova PhD, Wolfgang Ahrens PhD, Claire M. Healy PhD, Pagona Lagiou PhD, Ivana Holcatova PhD, Laia Alemany PhD, Ariana Znoar PhD, Tim Waterboer PhD, Paul Brennan PhD, Shama Virani PhD, David I. Conway PhD
{"title":"头颈部癌症风险预测模型的开发和外部验证。","authors":"Craig D. L. Smith BSc, Alex D. McMahon PhD, Donald M. Lyall PhD, Mariel Goulart MSc, Gareth J. Inman PhD, Al Ross PhD, Mark Gormley PhD, Tom Dudding PhD, Gary J. Macfarlane PhD, Max Robinson PhD, Lorenzo Richiardi PhD, Diego Serraino PhD, Jerry Polesel PhD, Cristina Canova PhD, Wolfgang Ahrens PhD, Claire M. Healy PhD, Pagona Lagiou PhD, Ivana Holcatova PhD, Laia Alemany PhD, Ariana Znoar PhD, Tim Waterboer PhD, Paul Brennan PhD, Shama Virani PhD, David I. Conway PhD","doi":"10.1002/hed.27834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence is on the rise, often diagnosed at late stage and associated with poor prognoses. Risk prediction tools have a potential role in prevention and early detection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The IARC-ARCAGE European case–control study was used as the model development dataset. A clinical HNC risk prediction model using behavioral and demographic predictors was developed via multivariable logistic regression analyses. The model was then externally validated in the UK Biobank cohort. Model performance was tested using discrimination and calibration metrics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>1926 HNC cases and 2043 controls were used for the development of the model. The development dataset model including sociodemographic, smoking, and alcohol variables had moderate discrimination, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77); the calibration slope (0.75) and tests were suggestive of good calibration. 384 616 UK Biobank participants (with 1177 HNC cases) were available for external validation of the model. Upon external validation, the model had an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61–0.64).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We developed and externally validated a HNC risk prediction model using the ARCAGE and UK Biobank studies, respectively. This model had moderate performance in the development population and acceptable performance in the validation dataset. Demographics and risk behaviors are strong predictors of HNC, and this model may be a helpful tool in primary dental care settings to promote prevention and determine recall intervals for dental examination. Future addition of HPV serology or genetic factors could further enhance individual risk prediction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hed.27834","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and external validation of a head and neck cancer risk prediction model\",\"authors\":\"Craig D. L. Smith BSc, Alex D. McMahon PhD, Donald M. Lyall PhD, Mariel Goulart MSc, Gareth J. Inman PhD, Al Ross PhD, Mark Gormley PhD, Tom Dudding PhD, Gary J. Macfarlane PhD, Max Robinson PhD, Lorenzo Richiardi PhD, Diego Serraino PhD, Jerry Polesel PhD, Cristina Canova PhD, Wolfgang Ahrens PhD, Claire M. Healy PhD, Pagona Lagiou PhD, Ivana Holcatova PhD, Laia Alemany PhD, Ariana Znoar PhD, Tim Waterboer PhD, Paul Brennan PhD, Shama Virani PhD, David I. Conway PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.27834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence is on the rise, often diagnosed at late stage and associated with poor prognoses. Risk prediction tools have a potential role in prevention and early detection.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The IARC-ARCAGE European case–control study was used as the model development dataset. A clinical HNC risk prediction model using behavioral and demographic predictors was developed via multivariable logistic regression analyses. The model was then externally validated in the UK Biobank cohort. Model performance was tested using discrimination and calibration metrics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>1926 HNC cases and 2043 controls were used for the development of the model. The development dataset model including sociodemographic, smoking, and alcohol variables had moderate discrimination, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77); the calibration slope (0.75) and tests were suggestive of good calibration. 384 616 UK Biobank participants (with 1177 HNC cases) were available for external validation of the model. Upon external validation, the model had an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61–0.64).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We developed and externally validated a HNC risk prediction model using the ARCAGE and UK Biobank studies, respectively. This model had moderate performance in the development population and acceptable performance in the validation dataset. Demographics and risk behaviors are strong predictors of HNC, and this model may be a helpful tool in primary dental care settings to promote prevention and determine recall intervals for dental examination. Future addition of HPV serology or genetic factors could further enhance individual risk prediction.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hed.27834\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.27834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and external validation of a head and neck cancer risk prediction model
Background
Head and neck cancer (HNC) incidence is on the rise, often diagnosed at late stage and associated with poor prognoses. Risk prediction tools have a potential role in prevention and early detection.
Methods
The IARC-ARCAGE European case–control study was used as the model development dataset. A clinical HNC risk prediction model using behavioral and demographic predictors was developed via multivariable logistic regression analyses. The model was then externally validated in the UK Biobank cohort. Model performance was tested using discrimination and calibration metrics.
Results
1926 HNC cases and 2043 controls were used for the development of the model. The development dataset model including sociodemographic, smoking, and alcohol variables had moderate discrimination, with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74–0.77); the calibration slope (0.75) and tests were suggestive of good calibration. 384 616 UK Biobank participants (with 1177 HNC cases) were available for external validation of the model. Upon external validation, the model had an AUC of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61–0.64).
Conclusion
We developed and externally validated a HNC risk prediction model using the ARCAGE and UK Biobank studies, respectively. This model had moderate performance in the development population and acceptable performance in the validation dataset. Demographics and risk behaviors are strong predictors of HNC, and this model may be a helpful tool in primary dental care settings to promote prevention and determine recall intervals for dental examination. Future addition of HPV serology or genetic factors could further enhance individual risk prediction.