Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert, Matúš Hoferica, Alvaro García-Tornel, Manuel Requena, Marta Rubiera, Marta De Dios Lascuevas, Marta Olivé-Gadea, Francesco Diana, Federica Rizzo, Marian Muchada, Tomás Carmona, Noelia Rodriguez-Villatoro, David Rodríguez-Luna, Jesus Juega, Jorge Pagola, David Hernández, Carlos A Molina, Alejandro Tomasello, Christophe Cognard, Marc Ribó
{"title":"使用替罗非班的支架再介入溶栓(SAIL)技术:血管成形术和支架植入术的潜在救助替代方案。","authors":"Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert, Matúš Hoferica, Alvaro García-Tornel, Manuel Requena, Marta Rubiera, Marta De Dios Lascuevas, Marta Olivé-Gadea, Francesco Diana, Federica Rizzo, Marian Muchada, Tomás Carmona, Noelia Rodriguez-Villatoro, David Rodríguez-Luna, Jesus Juega, Jorge Pagola, David Hernández, Carlos A Molina, Alejandro Tomasello, Christophe Cognard, Marc Ribó","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Angioplasty and stent placement have been described as a bailout technique in individuals with failed thrombectomy. We aimed to investigate Stent retriever AssIsted Lysis (SAIL) with tirofiban before angioplasty and stent placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers were reviewed (2020-2023). We included patients with failed thrombectomy and/or underlying intracranial stenosis who received SAIL with tirofiban before the intended angioplasty and stent placement. SAIL consisted of deploying a stent retriever through the occluding lesion to create a bypass channel and infuse 10 mL of tirofiban for 10 minutes either intra-arterially or IV. The stent retriever was re-sheathed before retrieval. The primary end points were successful reperfusion (expanded TICI 2b-3) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Additional end points included 90-day mRS 0-2 and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4) passes, 44 patients received the SAIL bridging protocol with tirofiban, and later they were considered potential candidates for angioplasty and stent placement bailout (43.2%, intra-arterial SAIL). Post-SAIL successful reperfusion was obtained in 79.5%. A notable residual stenosis (>50%) after successful SAIL was observed in 45.7%. No significant differences were detected according to post-SAIL: successful reperfusion (intra-arterial SAIL, 80.0% versus IV-SAIL, 78.9%; <i>P </i>= .932), significant stenosis (33.3% versus 55.0%; <i>P </i>= .203), early symptomatic re-occlusion (0% versus 8.0%; <i>P </i>= .207), or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (5.3% versus 8.0%; <i>P </i>= .721). Rescue angioplasty and stent placement were finally performed in 15 (34.1%) patients (intra-arterial SAIL 21.0% versus IV-SAIL 44%; <i>P </i>= .112). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 (intra-arterial SAIL 50.0% versus IV-SAIL 43.5%; <i>P </i>= .086) and mortality (26.3% versus 12.0%; <i>P </i>= .223) were also similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with stroke in which angioplasty and stent placement are considered, SAIL with tirofiban, either intra-arterial or IV, seems to safely induce sustained recanalization, offering a potential alternative to definitive angioplasty and stent placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stent Retriever AssIsted Lysis Technique with Tirofiban: A Potential Bailout Alternative to Angioplasty and Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Rodrigo-Gisbert, Matúš Hoferica, Alvaro García-Tornel, Manuel Requena, Marta Rubiera, Marta De Dios Lascuevas, Marta Olivé-Gadea, Francesco Diana, Federica Rizzo, Marian Muchada, Tomás Carmona, Noelia Rodriguez-Villatoro, David Rodríguez-Luna, Jesus Juega, Jorge Pagola, David Hernández, Carlos A Molina, Alejandro Tomasello, Christophe Cognard, Marc Ribó\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Angioplasty and stent placement have been described as a bailout technique in individuals with failed thrombectomy. We aimed to investigate Stent retriever AssIsted Lysis (SAIL) with tirofiban before angioplasty and stent placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers were reviewed (2020-2023). We included patients with failed thrombectomy and/or underlying intracranial stenosis who received SAIL with tirofiban before the intended angioplasty and stent placement. SAIL consisted of deploying a stent retriever through the occluding lesion to create a bypass channel and infuse 10 mL of tirofiban for 10 minutes either intra-arterially or IV. The stent retriever was re-sheathed before retrieval. The primary end points were successful reperfusion (expanded TICI 2b-3) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Additional end points included 90-day mRS 0-2 and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4) passes, 44 patients received the SAIL bridging protocol with tirofiban, and later they were considered potential candidates for angioplasty and stent placement bailout (43.2%, intra-arterial SAIL). Post-SAIL successful reperfusion was obtained in 79.5%. A notable residual stenosis (>50%) after successful SAIL was observed in 45.7%. No significant differences were detected according to post-SAIL: successful reperfusion (intra-arterial SAIL, 80.0% versus IV-SAIL, 78.9%; <i>P </i>= .932), significant stenosis (33.3% versus 55.0%; <i>P </i>= .203), early symptomatic re-occlusion (0% versus 8.0%; <i>P </i>= .207), or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (5.3% versus 8.0%; <i>P </i>= .721). Rescue angioplasty and stent placement were finally performed in 15 (34.1%) patients (intra-arterial SAIL 21.0% versus IV-SAIL 44%; <i>P </i>= .112). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 (intra-arterial SAIL 50.0% versus IV-SAIL 43.5%; <i>P </i>= .086) and mortality (26.3% versus 12.0%; <i>P </i>= .223) were also similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with stroke in which angioplasty and stent placement are considered, SAIL with tirofiban, either intra-arterial or IV, seems to safely induce sustained recanalization, offering a potential alternative to definitive angioplasty and stent placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8374\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:血管成形术和支架置入术(A&S)被描述为血栓切除术失败者的救助技术。我们旨在研究在血管成形术和支架植入术(A&S)前使用替罗非班进行支架回流辅助溶栓(SAIL):对来自 2 个综合卒中中心的患者进行了回顾性研究(2020-2023 年)。我们纳入了血栓切除术失败和/或潜在颅内狭窄的患者,这些患者在预定的 A&S 前接受了使用替罗非班的 SAIL。SAIL 包括通过闭塞病灶部署 SR 以创建旁路通道,并在 10 分钟内动脉内(IA)或静脉内(IV)注入 10 毫升替罗非班。SR在取回前重新加热。主要终点是成功再灌注(eTICI 2b-3)和sICH。其他终点包括 90 天 mRS 0-2 和死亡率:经过中位数3次(IQR 2-4次)手术后,44名患者接受了使用替罗非班的SAIL桥接方案,随后他们被认为是A&S救助的潜在候选者(43.2%为IA-SAIL)。79.5%的患者在 SAIL 后成功实现了再灌注。SAIL后再灌注成功率(IA-SAIL 80.0% vs IV-SAIL 78.9%;P=0.932)、SAIL后明显狭窄率(33.3% vs 55.0%;P=0.203)、早期症状性再闭塞率(0% vs 8.0%;P=0.207)或sICH率(5.3% vs 8.0%;P=0.721)均无明显差异。90天后,mRS 0-2(IA-SAIL 50.0% vs IV-SAIL 43.5%;p=0.086)和死亡率(26.3% vs 12.0%;p=0.223)也相似:结论:在考虑A&S救助的卒中患者中,使用替罗非班的SAIL,无论是动脉内还是静脉内,似乎都能安全地诱导持续再通畅,为最终A&S提供了潜在的替代方案:缩写:A&S = 血管成形术和支架置入术;ICAD = 颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病;ICAS-LVO = 颅内动脉粥样硬化相关大血管闭塞;EVT = 血管内治疗;LVO = 大血管闭塞;MT = 机械血栓清除术;SR = SR 支架回流术;SAIL = 支架回流辅助溶栓;sICH = 症状性颅内出血。
Stent Retriever AssIsted Lysis Technique with Tirofiban: A Potential Bailout Alternative to Angioplasty and Stenting.
Background and purpose: Angioplasty and stent placement have been described as a bailout technique in individuals with failed thrombectomy. We aimed to investigate Stent retriever AssIsted Lysis (SAIL) with tirofiban before angioplasty and stent placement.
Materials and methods: Patients from 2 comprehensive stroke centers were reviewed (2020-2023). We included patients with failed thrombectomy and/or underlying intracranial stenosis who received SAIL with tirofiban before the intended angioplasty and stent placement. SAIL consisted of deploying a stent retriever through the occluding lesion to create a bypass channel and infuse 10 mL of tirofiban for 10 minutes either intra-arterially or IV. The stent retriever was re-sheathed before retrieval. The primary end points were successful reperfusion (expanded TICI 2b-3) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Additional end points included 90-day mRS 0-2 and mortality.
Results: After a median of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4) passes, 44 patients received the SAIL bridging protocol with tirofiban, and later they were considered potential candidates for angioplasty and stent placement bailout (43.2%, intra-arterial SAIL). Post-SAIL successful reperfusion was obtained in 79.5%. A notable residual stenosis (>50%) after successful SAIL was observed in 45.7%. No significant differences were detected according to post-SAIL: successful reperfusion (intra-arterial SAIL, 80.0% versus IV-SAIL, 78.9%; P = .932), significant stenosis (33.3% versus 55.0%; P = .203), early symptomatic re-occlusion (0% versus 8.0%; P = .207), or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (5.3% versus 8.0%; P = .721). Rescue angioplasty and stent placement were finally performed in 15 (34.1%) patients (intra-arterial SAIL 21.0% versus IV-SAIL 44%; P = .112). At 90 days, mRS 0-2 (intra-arterial SAIL 50.0% versus IV-SAIL 43.5%; P = .086) and mortality (26.3% versus 12.0%; P = .223) were also similar.
Conclusions: In patients with stroke in which angioplasty and stent placement are considered, SAIL with tirofiban, either intra-arterial or IV, seems to safely induce sustained recanalization, offering a potential alternative to definitive angioplasty and stent placement.