自我激励和社会激励如何促进消费者接受移动医疗服务?

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100878
Da Tao , Kaifeng Liu
{"title":"自我激励和社会激励如何促进消费者接受移动医疗服务?","authors":"Da Tao ,&nbsp;Kaifeng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to propose a unified model integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), social-determination theory (SDT), and social motivation to examine the roles of self-motivation (i.e., autonomy, relatedness, and competency) and social motivation (i.e., social influence and social recognition) in consumer acceptance of m-health services. In addition, the study aimed to explore whether relationships among the antecedent factors and consumer acceptance of m-health services would be moderated by consumers’ demographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to test the proposed model with data from 614 Chinese m-health users. Multi-group analyses were performed to examine whether the results were different or equivalent across demographic backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Usage behavior was significantly influenced by behavioral intention. While self-motivations mostly exerted impacts on behavioral intention through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, social motivations affected behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, most of the hypothesized relations remained unchanged across gender, age, and usage experience.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reveals the important roles of varied self- and social motivations in developing consumer acceptance of m-health services. To facilitate consumers’ acceptance, m-health services should be designed to meet consumers’ internal requirements on autonomy and relatedness and earn recognition from social perspectives. The findings provide insights into the design and implementation of m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>M-health has long been considered as a promising tool to support individuals’ health care activities and achieve improved efficiency and quality in the delivery of health care services. However, the introduction of m-health to consumers has proven difficult, and wide acceptance has not been achieved. We conducted a field survey of 614 Chinese m-health users to identify the roles of self-motivation and social motivation in consumers’ acceptance of m-health services. We found that self-motivation can exert impacts on consumers’ acceptance through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, while social motivation affected acceptance both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, these effects mostly remained unchanged across consumers’ gender, age, and usage experience. Based on our findings, we propose implications to design and implement m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 3","pages":"Article 100878"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do self-motivation and social motivation contribute to consumers’ acceptance of m-health services?\",\"authors\":\"Da Tao ,&nbsp;Kaifeng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The study aimed to propose a unified model integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), social-determination theory (SDT), and social motivation to examine the roles of self-motivation (i.e., autonomy, relatedness, and competency) and social motivation (i.e., social influence and social recognition) in consumer acceptance of m-health services. In addition, the study aimed to explore whether relationships among the antecedent factors and consumer acceptance of m-health services would be moderated by consumers’ demographic characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to test the proposed model with data from 614 Chinese m-health users. Multi-group analyses were performed to examine whether the results were different or equivalent across demographic backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Usage behavior was significantly influenced by behavioral intention. While self-motivations mostly exerted impacts on behavioral intention through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, social motivations affected behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, most of the hypothesized relations remained unchanged across gender, age, and usage experience.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study reveals the important roles of varied self- and social motivations in developing consumer acceptance of m-health services. To facilitate consumers’ acceptance, m-health services should be designed to meet consumers’ internal requirements on autonomy and relatedness and earn recognition from social perspectives. The findings provide insights into the design and implementation of m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.</p></div><div><h3>Public interest summary</h3><p>M-health has long been considered as a promising tool to support individuals’ health care activities and achieve improved efficiency and quality in the delivery of health care services. However, the introduction of m-health to consumers has proven difficult, and wide acceptance has not been achieved. We conducted a field survey of 614 Chinese m-health users to identify the roles of self-motivation and social motivation in consumers’ acceptance of m-health services. We found that self-motivation can exert impacts on consumers’ acceptance through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, while social motivation affected acceptance both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, these effects mostly remained unchanged across consumers’ gender, age, and usage experience. Based on our findings, we propose implications to design and implement m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在提出一个整合了技术接受模型(TAM)、社会决定理论(SDT)和社会动机的统一模型,以探讨自我动机(即自主性、相关性和能力)和社会动机(即社会影响和社会认可)在消费者接受移动医疗服务中的作用。此外,该研究还旨在探讨消费者的人口统计学特征是否会调节前因因素与消费者对移动医疗服务接受度之间的关系。结果使用行为受到行为意向的显著影响。自我动机主要通过感知有用性和感知易用性的中介作用对行为意向产生影响,而社会动机则通过感知有用性的中介作用直接或间接地影响行为意向。此外,大多数假设关系在不同性别、年龄和使用经验的情况下保持不变。为促进消费者的接受,移动医疗服务的设计应满足消费者对自主性和相关性的内在要求,并从社会角度赢得认可。研究结果为移动医疗服务的设计和实施提供了见解,以支持不同人口背景的消费者接受移动医疗服务。 公益摘要移动医疗一直被认为是支持个人医疗保健活动、提高医疗保健服务效率和质量的有效工具。然而,事实证明,向消费者介绍移动医疗是困难的,而且尚未获得广泛接受。我们对 614 名中国移动医疗用户进行了实地调查,以确定自我激励和社会激励在消费者接受移动医疗服务中的作用。我们发现,自我动机可以通过感知有用性和感知易用性的中介作用对消费者的接受度产生影响,而社会动机则通过感知有用性的中介作用直接或间接地影响消费者的接受度。此外,这些效应在不同性别、年龄和使用经验的消费者中大多保持不变。根据我们的研究结果,我们提出了设计和实施移动医疗服务的启示,以支持不同人口背景的消费者接受移动医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do self-motivation and social motivation contribute to consumers’ acceptance of m-health services?

Objectives

The study aimed to propose a unified model integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), social-determination theory (SDT), and social motivation to examine the roles of self-motivation (i.e., autonomy, relatedness, and competency) and social motivation (i.e., social influence and social recognition) in consumer acceptance of m-health services. In addition, the study aimed to explore whether relationships among the antecedent factors and consumer acceptance of m-health services would be moderated by consumers’ demographic characteristics.

Methods

Partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach was used to test the proposed model with data from 614 Chinese m-health users. Multi-group analyses were performed to examine whether the results were different or equivalent across demographic backgrounds.

Results

Usage behavior was significantly influenced by behavioral intention. While self-motivations mostly exerted impacts on behavioral intention through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, social motivations affected behavioral intention both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, most of the hypothesized relations remained unchanged across gender, age, and usage experience.

Conclusions

This study reveals the important roles of varied self- and social motivations in developing consumer acceptance of m-health services. To facilitate consumers’ acceptance, m-health services should be designed to meet consumers’ internal requirements on autonomy and relatedness and earn recognition from social perspectives. The findings provide insights into the design and implementation of m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.

Public interest summary

M-health has long been considered as a promising tool to support individuals’ health care activities and achieve improved efficiency and quality in the delivery of health care services. However, the introduction of m-health to consumers has proven difficult, and wide acceptance has not been achieved. We conducted a field survey of 614 Chinese m-health users to identify the roles of self-motivation and social motivation in consumers’ acceptance of m-health services. We found that self-motivation can exert impacts on consumers’ acceptance through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, while social motivation affected acceptance both directly and indirectly through the mediating roles of perceived usefulness. In addition, these effects mostly remained unchanged across consumers’ gender, age, and usage experience. Based on our findings, we propose implications to design and implement m-health services in support of consumer acceptance across different demographic backgrounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1