{"title":"努力达到 \"母语标准\":成长信念可减轻社会比较对移民的某些有害影响","authors":"Nigel Mantou Lou , Kimberly A. Noels","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While upward social comparison can inspire and provide information for self-improvement, it can also threaten one’s self-confidence. This study examines how upward comparisons with “native speakers” relate to self-confidence and adaptation of migrant students who speak English as a second language, and the role of language mindsets in this process. Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 322) showed that the majority of migrant university students (67 %) tend to compare themselves with native speakers or people with higher levels of English proficiency (i.e., upward comparison), but those with fixed (vs. growth) mindsets were less likely to do so. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 101) showed that when migrant students compared to native speakers (vs. control), they reported lower level of confidence. However, some negative effects of social comparison were buffered by growth mindsets, such that people with growth (vs. fixed) mindsets were less anxious and more confident to adapt to their academic environment. These findings suggest the “native speaker standard” has detrimental effects on linguistic-minority students’ language, social, and academic adaptations, but a growth mindset might mitigate some of these negative effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 101990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000592/pdfft?md5=59317b8f8ba5a5a58b0f61be1b47aedd&pid=1-s2.0-S0147176724000592-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Striving to reach the “native speaker standard”: A growth belief may mitigate some deleterious effects of social comparison in migrants\",\"authors\":\"Nigel Mantou Lou , Kimberly A. Noels\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.101990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>While upward social comparison can inspire and provide information for self-improvement, it can also threaten one’s self-confidence. This study examines how upward comparisons with “native speakers” relate to self-confidence and adaptation of migrant students who speak English as a second language, and the role of language mindsets in this process. Study 1 (<em>n</em> = 322) showed that the majority of migrant university students (67 %) tend to compare themselves with native speakers or people with higher levels of English proficiency (i.e., upward comparison), but those with fixed (vs. growth) mindsets were less likely to do so. Study 2 (<em>n</em> = 101) showed that when migrant students compared to native speakers (vs. control), they reported lower level of confidence. However, some negative effects of social comparison were buffered by growth mindsets, such that people with growth (vs. fixed) mindsets were less anxious and more confident to adapt to their academic environment. These findings suggest the “native speaker standard” has detrimental effects on linguistic-minority students’ language, social, and academic adaptations, but a growth mindset might mitigate some of these negative effects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000592/pdfft?md5=59317b8f8ba5a5a58b0f61be1b47aedd&pid=1-s2.0-S0147176724000592-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000592\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724000592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Striving to reach the “native speaker standard”: A growth belief may mitigate some deleterious effects of social comparison in migrants
While upward social comparison can inspire and provide information for self-improvement, it can also threaten one’s self-confidence. This study examines how upward comparisons with “native speakers” relate to self-confidence and adaptation of migrant students who speak English as a second language, and the role of language mindsets in this process. Study 1 (n = 322) showed that the majority of migrant university students (67 %) tend to compare themselves with native speakers or people with higher levels of English proficiency (i.e., upward comparison), but those with fixed (vs. growth) mindsets were less likely to do so. Study 2 (n = 101) showed that when migrant students compared to native speakers (vs. control), they reported lower level of confidence. However, some negative effects of social comparison were buffered by growth mindsets, such that people with growth (vs. fixed) mindsets were less anxious and more confident to adapt to their academic environment. These findings suggest the “native speaker standard” has detrimental effects on linguistic-minority students’ language, social, and academic adaptations, but a growth mindset might mitigate some of these negative effects.
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.