孟加拉国纺织污水处理厂的超细纤维流行率和去除效率

IF 5.4 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of hazardous materials advances Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100436
Md. Morshedul Haque , Adhara Tanisha Kabir , Enamul Muyeed Latifi , D.M. Salah Mahmud , Md. Refat Hossain , Humayra Akhter Himu , Ummul Khair Fatema , Shafi M Tareq
{"title":"孟加拉国纺织污水处理厂的超细纤维流行率和去除效率","authors":"Md. Morshedul Haque ,&nbsp;Adhara Tanisha Kabir ,&nbsp;Enamul Muyeed Latifi ,&nbsp;D.M. Salah Mahmud ,&nbsp;Md. Refat Hossain ,&nbsp;Humayra Akhter Himu ,&nbsp;Ummul Khair Fatema ,&nbsp;Shafi M Tareq","doi":"10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bangladesh is one of the hubs of the textile industry in the world; consequently, microfibers are an emerging threat to the aquatic ecosystem. Traditional effluent treatment plants (ETPs) might not be capable of removing most emerging pollutants like surfactants, dyes, and additives, including microfibers, and the textile industry may be a major source of microfiber pollution through products and ETPs. This study investigated the eleven woven, knit, and denim industries' ETP microfiber abundance and removal efficiency. The average (range) of microfibers found in influent, effluent, and sludge samples was 615.45 ± 377.52 particles/L (170−1460), 212.72 ± 80.14 particles/L (130−380), and 10545.45 ± 7989.54 particles/kg (4400−31000), respectively. The abundant shape was fiber, and most microfibres had sizes between 0 and 100 μm. Eight distinct colors of microfibers were found in the samples; black was the most abundant color among all the samples, followed by brown and blue. The studied ETPs showed a 23.52 % to 82.19 % microfiber removal rate, which is not satisfactory for minimizing pollution. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis revealed that the main polymers in the samples were nylon, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), cellulose acetate (CA), low-density polyethylene (LDPE or linear LDPE), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The contamination factor (CF) and pollution load index (PLI), which assess ecological risks, showed that samples were moderately to very highly contaminated by microfiber and could pose a threat to the aquatic ecosystem. The findings would help identify transformative challenges required for minimizing microfiber pollution from industrial sectors and improving ETP systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73763,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100436"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000378/pdfft?md5=1b9e29d65577a217950c07734e584b20&pid=1-s2.0-S2772416624000378-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microfiber prevalence and removal efficiency of textile effluent treatment plants in Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"Md. Morshedul Haque ,&nbsp;Adhara Tanisha Kabir ,&nbsp;Enamul Muyeed Latifi ,&nbsp;D.M. Salah Mahmud ,&nbsp;Md. Refat Hossain ,&nbsp;Humayra Akhter Himu ,&nbsp;Ummul Khair Fatema ,&nbsp;Shafi M Tareq\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hazadv.2024.100436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bangladesh is one of the hubs of the textile industry in the world; consequently, microfibers are an emerging threat to the aquatic ecosystem. Traditional effluent treatment plants (ETPs) might not be capable of removing most emerging pollutants like surfactants, dyes, and additives, including microfibers, and the textile industry may be a major source of microfiber pollution through products and ETPs. This study investigated the eleven woven, knit, and denim industries' ETP microfiber abundance and removal efficiency. The average (range) of microfibers found in influent, effluent, and sludge samples was 615.45 ± 377.52 particles/L (170−1460), 212.72 ± 80.14 particles/L (130−380), and 10545.45 ± 7989.54 particles/kg (4400−31000), respectively. The abundant shape was fiber, and most microfibres had sizes between 0 and 100 μm. Eight distinct colors of microfibers were found in the samples; black was the most abundant color among all the samples, followed by brown and blue. The studied ETPs showed a 23.52 % to 82.19 % microfiber removal rate, which is not satisfactory for minimizing pollution. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis revealed that the main polymers in the samples were nylon, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), cellulose acetate (CA), low-density polyethylene (LDPE or linear LDPE), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The contamination factor (CF) and pollution load index (PLI), which assess ecological risks, showed that samples were moderately to very highly contaminated by microfiber and could pose a threat to the aquatic ecosystem. The findings would help identify transformative challenges required for minimizing microfiber pollution from industrial sectors and improving ETP systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000378/pdfft?md5=1b9e29d65577a217950c07734e584b20&pid=1-s2.0-S2772416624000378-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hazardous materials advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772416624000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孟加拉国是世界纺织工业中心之一;因此,超细纤维对水生生态系统构成了新的威胁。传统的污水处理厂(ETP)可能无法去除大多数新出现的污染物,如表面活性剂、染料和添加剂,包括超细纤维,而纺织业可能是通过产品和 ETP 造成超细纤维污染的主要来源。本研究调查了 11 个机织、针织和牛仔布行业的 ETP 超细纤维丰度和去除效率。在进水、出水和污泥样品中发现的微纤维平均值(范围)分别为 615.45 ± 377.52 微粒/升(170-1460)、212.72 ± 80.14 微粒/升(130-380)和 10545.45 ± 7989.54 微粒/千克(4400-31000)。大量微纤维呈纤维状,大多数微纤维的尺寸在 0 至 100 μm 之间。在样品中发现了八种不同颜色的微纤维;黑色是所有样品中最多的颜色,其次是棕色和蓝色。所研究的 ETPs 对微细纤维的去除率为 23.52 % 到 82.19 %,这对于最大限度地减少污染来说并不理想。傅立叶变换红外(FTIR)分析显示,样品中的主要聚合物是尼龙、乙烯-醋酸乙烯(EVA)、聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PETE)、丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)、醋酸纤维素(CA)、低密度聚乙烯(LDPE 或线型 LDPE)和高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)。评估生态风险的污染因子(CF)和污染负荷指数(PLI)显示,样品受到超细纤维中度到高度污染,可能对水生生态系统构成威胁。这些研究结果将有助于确定最大限度减少工业部门超细纤维污染和改进 ETP 系统所需的变革性挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microfiber prevalence and removal efficiency of textile effluent treatment plants in Bangladesh

Bangladesh is one of the hubs of the textile industry in the world; consequently, microfibers are an emerging threat to the aquatic ecosystem. Traditional effluent treatment plants (ETPs) might not be capable of removing most emerging pollutants like surfactants, dyes, and additives, including microfibers, and the textile industry may be a major source of microfiber pollution through products and ETPs. This study investigated the eleven woven, knit, and denim industries' ETP microfiber abundance and removal efficiency. The average (range) of microfibers found in influent, effluent, and sludge samples was 615.45 ± 377.52 particles/L (170−1460), 212.72 ± 80.14 particles/L (130−380), and 10545.45 ± 7989.54 particles/kg (4400−31000), respectively. The abundant shape was fiber, and most microfibres had sizes between 0 and 100 μm. Eight distinct colors of microfibers were found in the samples; black was the most abundant color among all the samples, followed by brown and blue. The studied ETPs showed a 23.52 % to 82.19 % microfiber removal rate, which is not satisfactory for minimizing pollution. The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis revealed that the main polymers in the samples were nylon, ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), polyethylene terephthalate (PETE), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), cellulose acetate (CA), low-density polyethylene (LDPE or linear LDPE), and high-density polyethylene (HDPE). The contamination factor (CF) and pollution load index (PLI), which assess ecological risks, showed that samples were moderately to very highly contaminated by microfiber and could pose a threat to the aquatic ecosystem. The findings would help identify transformative challenges required for minimizing microfiber pollution from industrial sectors and improving ETP systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hazardous materials advances
Journal of hazardous materials advances Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
Unveiling cadmium toxicity in Etroplus suratensis through endpoint analysis and biomarker profiling: A step towards coastal water quality guideline development Bibliometric analysis of emerging contaminants and cytostatic compounds: Understanding the current challenges Quantification of toxic metals contamination and health risk assessment in processed and raw dairy products in Abbottabad city The pesticide paradox: Metabolomics insights into N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) exposure as a culprit of infant undernourishment Innovative binding gels in diffusive gradients in thin film to detect hazardous contaminants: A critical review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1