用压力痛阈评估泡沫滚动对健康参与者和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者局部和远处疼痛敏感性的影响:系统综述

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.027
Christoph Habscheid, Tibor M. Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke Ph
{"title":"用压力痛阈评估泡沫滚动对健康参与者和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者局部和远处疼痛敏感性的影响:系统综述","authors":"Christoph Habscheid,&nbsp;Tibor M. Szikszay,&nbsp;Kerstin Luedtke Ph","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073/pdfft?md5=4753259881ca8c521bf69ecaf7614ead&pid=1-s2.0-S1360859224003073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of foam rolling on local and distant pain sensitivity assessed with pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and musculoskeletal pain patients: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Habscheid,&nbsp;Tibor M. Szikszay,&nbsp;Kerstin Luedtke Ph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073/pdfft?md5=4753259881ca8c521bf69ecaf7614ead&pid=1-s2.0-S1360859224003073-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:使用泡沫滚筒进行自我治疗是一种流行的肌筋膜松解方式,但其潜在机制,尤其是对疼痛敏感性的影响,仍不清楚。据推测,局部低痛效应可能是由于筋膜和肌肉组织的变化所致,而远处效应则可能受到中枢内源性疼痛调节的影响。本系统性综述旨在量化泡沫滚动干预的局部和远端减痛效果之间的差异。方法在 Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 等数据库中进行了系统性检索。纳入了已发表的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,这些试验调查了泡沫滚动对健康人和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的影响。根据 Cochrane 手册的建议进行了质量评估和证据综合。使用标准化均值差异和 95% CIs 进行了荟萃分析。结果在前后比较中,局部 PPTs 在滚动后发生了变化,但影响较小:SMD = -0.42 (95 % CI = -0.57 to -0.26);I2 = 1 %。远程 PPT 也在滚动后发生变化,但影响较小:SMD = -0.47 (95 % CI = -0.80 to -0.14);I2 = 0 %。与对照组相比,泡沫滚揉对局部 PPT 没有影响:结论:在健康人群中,泡沫滚动对 PPT 的影响并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of foam rolling on local and distant pain sensitivity assessed with pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and musculoskeletal pain patients: A systematic review

Introduction

The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.

Method

A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.

Results

Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.

Conclusion

No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of craniocervical posture after myofascial pain treatment in adults with bruxism: A randomized clinical trial How effective is proprioception exercise on pain, grip force, dexterity and proprioception of elbow joint in patients with tennis elbow? A randomized controlled trial Effectiveness of a cervical treatment in wind-instrument musicians with temporomandibular dysfunction: A randomized clinical trial Preventive effect of foam rolling on muscle soreness after exercise: A systematic review and meta-analysis Effectiveness of the scapula mobilization technique on the neural mechanosensitivity of the upper limb neural test 1 in individuals with mechanical cervicalgia. A randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1