Christoph Habscheid, Tibor M. Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke Ph
{"title":"用压力痛阈评估泡沫滚动对健康参与者和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者局部和远处疼痛敏感性的影响:系统综述","authors":"Christoph Habscheid, Tibor M. Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke Ph","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073/pdfft?md5=4753259881ca8c521bf69ecaf7614ead&pid=1-s2.0-S1360859224003073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of foam rolling on local and distant pain sensitivity assessed with pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and musculoskeletal pain patients: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Christoph Habscheid, Tibor M. Szikszay, Kerstin Luedtke Ph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073/pdfft?md5=4753259881ca8c521bf69ecaf7614ead&pid=1-s2.0-S1360859224003073-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224003073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:使用泡沫滚筒进行自我治疗是一种流行的肌筋膜松解方式,但其潜在机制,尤其是对疼痛敏感性的影响,仍不清楚。据推测,局部低痛效应可能是由于筋膜和肌肉组织的变化所致,而远处效应则可能受到中枢内源性疼痛调节的影响。本系统性综述旨在量化泡沫滚动干预的局部和远端减痛效果之间的差异。方法在 Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 等数据库中进行了系统性检索。纳入了已发表的随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,这些试验调查了泡沫滚动对健康人和肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的影响。根据 Cochrane 手册的建议进行了质量评估和证据综合。使用标准化均值差异和 95% CIs 进行了荟萃分析。结果在前后比较中,局部 PPTs 在滚动后发生了变化,但影响较小:SMD = -0.42 (95 % CI = -0.57 to -0.26);I2 = 1 %。远程 PPT 也在滚动后发生变化,但影响较小:SMD = -0.47 (95 % CI = -0.80 to -0.14);I2 = 0 %。与对照组相比,泡沫滚揉对局部 PPT 没有影响:结论:在健康人群中,泡沫滚动对 PPT 的影响并不一致。
The effect of foam rolling on local and distant pain sensitivity assessed with pressure pain thresholds in healthy participants and musculoskeletal pain patients: A systematic review
Introduction
The self-treatment with a foam roller is a popular form of myofascial release, although the underlying mechanisms, particularly on pain sensitivity, remain unclear. It is hypothesized that the hypoalgesic local effects are probably due to changes in fascial and muscle tissue, whereas remote effects may be influenced by central endogenous pain modulation. This systematic review aimed to quantify the difference between local and remote hypoalgesic effects of the foam rolling intervention.
Method
A systematic search was conducted in the databases Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Published randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials investigating the effects of foam rolling on Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) in healthy individuals and patients with musculoskeletal pain were included. Quality assessment and evidence synthesis were performed according to Cochrane Handbook recommendations. A meta-analysis was performed using standardized mean differences and 95% CIs.
Results
Local PPTs changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.42 (95 % CI = −0.57 to −0.26); I2 = 1 %. Remote PPTs also changed after rolling in a pre-post comparison with a small effect size: SMD = −0.47 (95 % CI = −0.80 to −0.14); I2 = 0 %. Foam rolling showed no effect on local PPTs when compared with a control group: SMD = 0.10 (95 % CI = −0.19 to 0.39); I2 = 0 %.
Conclusion
No consistent effects of foam rolling on PPTs were demonstrated in healthy individuals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina