中国狼疮性肾炎患者的医院医疗资源利用和相关住院费用:全国行政报销数据库研究

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101001
Xin He PhD , Xiaochen Zhu MS , Zhiliu Tang PhD , Kerry Gairy MSc , Patricia Juliao Ph.D , Zongxi Wu BSc , Sheng Han PhD
{"title":"中国狼疮性肾炎患者的医院医疗资源利用和相关住院费用:全国行政报销数据库研究","authors":"Xin He PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Zhu MS ,&nbsp;Zhiliu Tang PhD ,&nbsp;Kerry Gairy MSc ,&nbsp;Patricia Juliao Ph.D ,&nbsp;Zongxi Wu BSc ,&nbsp;Sheng Han PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess hospital healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China and compare these outcomes with a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort (SLE with/without LN) as well as exploring the effect of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective administrative claims-based analysis identified patients with SLE and SLE with LN from China using diagnosis codes and keywords. Patients with LN were subcategorized by presence of ESKD. Outcomes included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU (defined as healthcare visits including inpatient and outpatient visits) and medical costs (in 2022 US dollars).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 3645 patients with SLE were included, of whom 404 (11%) had LN. Among those with LN, 142 (35%) had ESKD. Median (interquartile range) all-cause healthcare visits per patient per month (PPPM) was significantly greater for patients with LN (2.08 [4.01]) vs SLE (0.92 [1.64]; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Patients with LN and ESKD (3.00 [4.18]) had numerically more all-cause healthcare visits PPPM compared with LN patients without ESKD (1.50 [3.45]). Median all-cause costs PPPM were significantly greater among patients with LN ($287.46 [477.15]) vs SLE ($113.09 [267.39]; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and numerically higher for patients with LN and ESKD ($466.29 [958.90]) vs LN without ESKD ($223.50 [319.56]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Chinese patients with LN had greater HCRU and hospital healthcare costs compared with the general SLE cohort. This burden was higher for those with ESKD. These data highlight the substantial HCRU among patients with LN in China, especially those with ESKD, suggesting the need for early diagnosis and timely management of LN to mitigate the economic burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Hospital Costs of Patients With Lupus Nephritis in China: A National Administrative Claim Database Study\",\"authors\":\"Xin He PhD ,&nbsp;Xiaochen Zhu MS ,&nbsp;Zhiliu Tang PhD ,&nbsp;Kerry Gairy MSc ,&nbsp;Patricia Juliao Ph.D ,&nbsp;Zongxi Wu BSc ,&nbsp;Sheng Han PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess hospital healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China and compare these outcomes with a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort (SLE with/without LN) as well as exploring the effect of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective administrative claims-based analysis identified patients with SLE and SLE with LN from China using diagnosis codes and keywords. Patients with LN were subcategorized by presence of ESKD. Outcomes included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU (defined as healthcare visits including inpatient and outpatient visits) and medical costs (in 2022 US dollars).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 3645 patients with SLE were included, of whom 404 (11%) had LN. Among those with LN, 142 (35%) had ESKD. Median (interquartile range) all-cause healthcare visits per patient per month (PPPM) was significantly greater for patients with LN (2.08 [4.01]) vs SLE (0.92 [1.64]; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Patients with LN and ESKD (3.00 [4.18]) had numerically more all-cause healthcare visits PPPM compared with LN patients without ESKD (1.50 [3.45]). Median all-cause costs PPPM were significantly greater among patients with LN ($287.46 [477.15]) vs SLE ($113.09 [267.39]; <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and numerically higher for patients with LN and ESKD ($466.29 [958.90]) vs LN without ESKD ($223.50 [319.56]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Chinese patients with LN had greater HCRU and hospital healthcare costs compared with the general SLE cohort. This burden was higher for those with ESKD. These data highlight the substantial HCRU among patients with LN in China, especially those with ESKD, suggesting the need for early diagnosis and timely management of LN to mitigate the economic burden.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000347\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 评估中国狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者的医院医疗资源利用率(HCRU)和相关住院费用,并将这些结果与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)队列(伴有/不伴有 LN 的系统性红斑狼疮)进行比较,同时探讨终末期肾病(ESKD)的影响。方法 这项基于行政索赔的回顾性分析使用诊断代码和关键词识别了中国的系统性红斑狼疮和伴有 LN 的系统性红斑狼疮患者。根据是否患有 ESKD 对 LN 患者进行了细分。结果包括全因和疾病特异性 HCRU(定义为包括住院和门诊在内的医疗就诊次数)和医疗费用(以 2022 年美元计算)。在LN患者中,142人(35%)患有ESKD。LN患者(2.08 [4.01])与系统性红斑狼疮患者(0.92 [1.64];P < .0001)每月因各种原因就诊的中位数(四分位数间距)明显高于系统性红斑狼疮患者(0.92 [1.64];P < .0001)。与不伴有 ESKD 的 LN 患者(1.50 [3.45])相比,伴有 ESKD 的 LN 患者(3.00 [4.18])的全因医疗就诊次数中位数(PPPM)更高。LN患者(287.46 [477.15]美元)与系统性红斑狼疮患者(113.09 [267.39]美元;P < .0001)的全因费用中位数(PPPM)明显高于系统性红斑狼疮患者(113.09 [267.39]美元;P < .0001),LN合并ESKD患者(466.29 [958.90]美元)与LN未合并ESKD患者(223.50 [319.56]美元)的全因费用中位数(PPPM)明显高于系统性红斑狼疮患者(223.50 [319.56]美元)。其中,ESKD患者的负担更高。这些数据凸显了中国LN患者,尤其是ESKD患者的巨大HCRU,表明需要早期诊断和及时处理LN,以减轻经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hospital Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Hospital Costs of Patients With Lupus Nephritis in China: A National Administrative Claim Database Study

Objectives

Assess hospital healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated hospital costs of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) in China and compare these outcomes with a systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cohort (SLE with/without LN) as well as exploring the effect of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

Methods

This retrospective administrative claims-based analysis identified patients with SLE and SLE with LN from China using diagnosis codes and keywords. Patients with LN were subcategorized by presence of ESKD. Outcomes included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU (defined as healthcare visits including inpatient and outpatient visits) and medical costs (in 2022 US dollars).

Results

In total, 3645 patients with SLE were included, of whom 404 (11%) had LN. Among those with LN, 142 (35%) had ESKD. Median (interquartile range) all-cause healthcare visits per patient per month (PPPM) was significantly greater for patients with LN (2.08 [4.01]) vs SLE (0.92 [1.64]; P < .0001). Patients with LN and ESKD (3.00 [4.18]) had numerically more all-cause healthcare visits PPPM compared with LN patients without ESKD (1.50 [3.45]). Median all-cause costs PPPM were significantly greater among patients with LN ($287.46 [477.15]) vs SLE ($113.09 [267.39]; P < .0001) and numerically higher for patients with LN and ESKD ($466.29 [958.90]) vs LN without ESKD ($223.50 [319.56]).

Conclusions

Chinese patients with LN had greater HCRU and hospital healthcare costs compared with the general SLE cohort. This burden was higher for those with ESKD. These data highlight the substantial HCRU among patients with LN in China, especially those with ESKD, suggesting the need for early diagnosis and timely management of LN to mitigate the economic burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Understanding What Matters: Stakeholder Views on Decision Criteria for Cancer Drug Selection in the Public Sector in Malaysia. Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore Cost-Utility Analysis of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Comparison With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Iran. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1