积极情绪通过调节奖励预测错误的影响来调节记忆

Salman E. Qasim, Aarushi Deswal, Ignacio Saez, Xiaosi Gu
{"title":"积极情绪通过调节奖励预测错误的影响来调节记忆","authors":"Salman E. Qasim, Aarushi Deswal, Ignacio Saez, Xiaosi Gu","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How our decisions impact our memories is not well understood. Reward prediction errors (RPEs), the difference between expected and obtained reward, help us learn to make optimal decisions-providing a signal that may influence subsequent memory. To measure this influence and how it might go awry in mood disorders, we recruited a large cohort of human participants to perform a decision-making task in which perceptually memorable stimuli were associated with probabilistic rewards, followed by a recognition test for those stimuli. Computational modeling revealed that positive RPEs enhanced both the accuracy of memory and the temporal efficiency of memory search, beyond the contribution of perceptual information. Critically, positive affect upregulated the beneficial effect of RPEs on memory. These findings demonstrate how affect selectively regulates the impact of RPEs on memory, providing a computational mechanism for biased memory in mood disorders. Incidental reward prediction errors associated with individual items during a decision-making period affect later memory accuracy and efficiency of the memory search. This association is modulated by individual differences in positive affect.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00106-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors\",\"authors\":\"Salman E. Qasim, Aarushi Deswal, Ignacio Saez, Xiaosi Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How our decisions impact our memories is not well understood. Reward prediction errors (RPEs), the difference between expected and obtained reward, help us learn to make optimal decisions-providing a signal that may influence subsequent memory. To measure this influence and how it might go awry in mood disorders, we recruited a large cohort of human participants to perform a decision-making task in which perceptually memorable stimuli were associated with probabilistic rewards, followed by a recognition test for those stimuli. Computational modeling revealed that positive RPEs enhanced both the accuracy of memory and the temporal efficiency of memory search, beyond the contribution of perceptual information. Critically, positive affect upregulated the beneficial effect of RPEs on memory. These findings demonstrate how affect selectively regulates the impact of RPEs on memory, providing a computational mechanism for biased memory in mood disorders. Incidental reward prediction errors associated with individual items during a decision-making period affect later memory accuracy and efficiency of the memory search. This association is modulated by individual differences in positive affect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00106-4.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00106-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00106-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的决定如何影响我们的记忆,目前还不十分清楚。奖赏预测误差(RPEs)是预期奖赏与获得奖赏之间的差值,它帮助我们学会做出最佳决策--提供一种可能影响后续记忆的信号。为了测量这种影响以及它在情绪障碍中可能出现的问题,我们招募了一大批人类参与者来完成一项决策任务,在这项任务中,知觉记忆刺激与概率奖励相关联,然后对这些刺激进行识别测试。计算模型显示,积极的情绪情感反应会提高记忆的准确性和记忆搜索的时间效率,这超出了感知信息的贡献。重要的是,积极情绪会增强 RPE 对记忆的有益影响。这些发现证明了情绪如何选择性地调节 RPEs 对记忆的影响,为情绪障碍中的偏差记忆提供了一种计算机制。决策期间与单个项目相关的偶然奖励预测错误会影响后期记忆的准确性和记忆搜索的效率。这种关联受个体积极情绪差异的调节。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors
How our decisions impact our memories is not well understood. Reward prediction errors (RPEs), the difference between expected and obtained reward, help us learn to make optimal decisions-providing a signal that may influence subsequent memory. To measure this influence and how it might go awry in mood disorders, we recruited a large cohort of human participants to perform a decision-making task in which perceptually memorable stimuli were associated with probabilistic rewards, followed by a recognition test for those stimuli. Computational modeling revealed that positive RPEs enhanced both the accuracy of memory and the temporal efficiency of memory search, beyond the contribution of perceptual information. Critically, positive affect upregulated the beneficial effect of RPEs on memory. These findings demonstrate how affect selectively regulates the impact of RPEs on memory, providing a computational mechanism for biased memory in mood disorders. Incidental reward prediction errors associated with individual items during a decision-making period affect later memory accuracy and efficiency of the memory search. This association is modulated by individual differences in positive affect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles Three diverse motives for information sharing Cultural contexts differentially shape parents’ loneliness and wellbeing during the empty nest period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1