多学科协作护理对基层医疗机构糖尿病患者心血管风险因素的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Primary Care Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.05.003
{"title":"多学科协作护理对基层医疗机构糖尿病患者心血管风险因素的影响:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multidisciplinary collaborative care has been widely recommended as an effective strategy for managing diabetes; however, the cardiovascular risk factors of patients with diabetes are often inadequately managed in primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the effect of multidisciplinary collaboration on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were systematically searched to retrieve randomised controlled trials. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the interventions included a multidisciplinary team with professionals from at least three health disciplines and focused on patients with diabetes in primary care settings. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 19 studies comprising 6538 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with usual care, multidisciplinary collaborative care significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors, including mean systolic blood pressure (–3.27 mm Hg, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: –4.72 to –1.82, p &lt; 0.01), diastolic blood pressure (–1.4 mm Hg, 95 % CI: –2.32 to –0.47, p &lt; 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (–0.42 %, 95 % CI: –0.59 to –0.25, p &lt; 0.01), low-density lipoprotein (–0.16 mmol/L, 95 % CI: –0.26 to –0.06, p &lt; 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (0.06 mmol/L, 95 % CI: 0.00–0.12, p &lt; 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed multidisciplinary collaboration was more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk factors when it comprised team members from a number of different disciplines, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological components, included both face-to-face and remote interactions and was implemented in high-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multidisciplinary collaborative care is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care. Further studies need to be conducted to determine the optimal team composition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 381-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824001116/pdfft?md5=8d27731057e2f1603c3323c4a2cc31d6&pid=1-s2.0-S1751991824001116-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of multidisciplinary collaborative care on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Multidisciplinary collaborative care has been widely recommended as an effective strategy for managing diabetes; however, the cardiovascular risk factors of patients with diabetes are often inadequately managed in primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the effect of multidisciplinary collaboration on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Five databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were systematically searched to retrieve randomised controlled trials. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the interventions included a multidisciplinary team with professionals from at least three health disciplines and focused on patients with diabetes in primary care settings. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 19 studies comprising 6538 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with usual care, multidisciplinary collaborative care significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors, including mean systolic blood pressure (–3.27 mm Hg, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: –4.72 to –1.82, p &lt; 0.01), diastolic blood pressure (–1.4 mm Hg, 95 % CI: –2.32 to –0.47, p &lt; 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (–0.42 %, 95 % CI: –0.59 to –0.25, p &lt; 0.01), low-density lipoprotein (–0.16 mmol/L, 95 % CI: –0.26 to –0.06, p &lt; 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (0.06 mmol/L, 95 % CI: 0.00–0.12, p &lt; 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed multidisciplinary collaboration was more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk factors when it comprised team members from a number of different disciplines, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological components, included both face-to-face and remote interactions and was implemented in high-income countries.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multidisciplinary collaborative care is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care. Further studies need to be conducted to determine the optimal team composition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 381-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824001116/pdfft?md5=8d27731057e2f1603c3323c4a2cc31d6&pid=1-s2.0-S1751991824001116-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824001116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824001116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多学科协作护理已被广泛推荐为管理糖尿病的有效策略;然而,在初级医疗机构中,糖尿病患者的心血管风险因素往往得不到充分管理。本研究旨在评估多学科协作对初级医疗机构糖尿病患者心血管风险因素的影响:系统检索了五个数据库(即 Medline、Embase、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 CENTRAL),以检索随机对照试验。如果干预措施包括一个多学科团队,其中至少有来自三个健康学科的专业人员,并且以初级医疗机构中的糖尿病患者为研究对象,则符合纳入条件。采用随机效应模型计算汇总效应:荟萃分析共纳入了 19 项研究,涉及 6538 名患者。结果显示,与常规护理相比,多学科协作护理能显著降低心血管风险因素,包括平均收缩压(-3.27 mm Hg,95 % 置信区间 [CI]:-4.72 至 -1.82, p < 0.01)、舒张压(-1.4 mm Hg,95 % 置信区间:-2.32 至 -0.47,p <0.01)、糖化血红蛋白(-0.42 %,95 % 置信区间:-0.59 至 -0.25,p <0.01)、低密度脂蛋白(-0.16 mmol/L,95 % 置信区间:-0.26 至 -0.06,p <0.01)和高密度脂蛋白(0.06 mmol/L,95 % 置信区间:0.00 至 0.12,p <0.05)。亚组分析表明,当多学科协作由来自不同学科的团队成员组成、结合药物和非药物成分、包括面对面和远程互动以及在高收入国家实施时,能更有效地降低心血管风险因素:结论:多学科协作护理与初级医疗中糖尿病患者心血管风险因素的降低有关。需要开展进一步研究,以确定最佳团队组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of multidisciplinary collaborative care on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Multidisciplinary collaborative care has been widely recommended as an effective strategy for managing diabetes; however, the cardiovascular risk factors of patients with diabetes are often inadequately managed in primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the effect of multidisciplinary collaboration on cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care settings.

Methods

Five databases (i.e., Medline, Embase, CINAHL, SCOPUS and CENTRAL) were systematically searched to retrieve randomised controlled trials. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the interventions included a multidisciplinary team with professionals from at least three health disciplines and focused on patients with diabetes in primary care settings. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled effects.

Results

In total, 19 studies comprising 6538 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared with usual care, multidisciplinary collaborative care significantly reduced cardiovascular risk factors, including mean systolic blood pressure (–3.27 mm Hg, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: –4.72 to –1.82, p < 0.01), diastolic blood pressure (–1.4 mm Hg, 95 % CI: –2.32 to –0.47, p < 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (–0.42 %, 95 % CI: –0.59 to –0.25, p < 0.01), low-density lipoprotein (–0.16 mmol/L, 95 % CI: –0.26 to –0.06, p < 0.01) and high-density lipoprotein (0.06 mmol/L, 95 % CI: 0.00–0.12, p < 0.05). The subgroup analysis showed multidisciplinary collaboration was more effective in reducing cardiovascular risk factors when it comprised team members from a number of different disciplines, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological components, included both face-to-face and remote interactions and was implemented in high-income countries.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary collaborative care is associated with reduced cardiovascular risk factors among patients with diabetes in primary care. Further studies need to be conducted to determine the optimal team composition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Diabetes
Primary Care Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
134
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board and Aims & Scopes Proactive total diet replacement referral for type 2 diabetes: A service evaluation Impact of lifestyle intervention on vitamin D, Adiponectin, Insulin-like growth factor 1 and Proneurotensin in overweight individuals from the Middle East Re-purposing SGLT-2 inhibitors for diabetic striatopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1