救护车临床医生使用毛细血管血酮测量仪改善高血糖急救护理:阶梯式对照、混合方法可行性研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1111/dme.15372
Larissa Stella Prothero, Thomas Strudwick, Theresa Foster, Andrea Kathleen Lake, Adrian Boyle, Allan Clark, Julia Williams, Gerry Rayman, Ketan Dhatariya
{"title":"救护车临床医生使用毛细血管血酮测量仪改善高血糖急救护理:阶梯式对照、混合方法可行性研究。","authors":"Larissa Stella Prothero,&nbsp;Thomas Strudwick,&nbsp;Theresa Foster,&nbsp;Andrea Kathleen Lake,&nbsp;Adrian Boyle,&nbsp;Allan Clark,&nbsp;Julia Williams,&nbsp;Gerry Rayman,&nbsp;Ketan Dhatariya","doi":"10.1111/dme.15372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To determine whether it was feasible, safe and acceptable for ambulance clinicians to use capillary blood ketone meters for ‘high-risk’ diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recognition and fluid initiation, to inform the need for a full-powered, multi-centre trial.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adopting a stepped-wedge controlled design, participants with hyperglycaemia (capillary blood glucose &gt;11.0 mmol/L) or diabetes and unwell were recruited. ‘High-risk’ DKA intervention participants (capillary blood ketones ≥3.0 mmol/L) received paramedic-led fluid therapy. Participant demographic and clinical data were collated from ambulance and hospital care records. Twenty ambulance and Emergency Department clinicians were interviewed to understand their hyperglycaemia and DKA care experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, 388 participants were recruited (Control: <i>n</i> = 203; Intervention: <i>n</i> = 185). Most presented with hyperglycaemia, and incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes was 18.5% and 74.3%, respectively. Ketone meter use facilitated ‘high-risk’ DKA identification (control: 2.5%, <i>n</i> = 5; intervention: 6.5%, <i>n</i> = 12) and was associated with improved hospital pre-alerting. Ambulance clinicians appeared to have a high index of suspicion for hospital-diagnosed DKA participants. One third (33.3%; <i>n</i> = 3) of Control and almost half (45.5%; <i>n</i> = 5) of Intervention DKA participants received pre-hospital fluid therapy.</p>\n \n <p>Key interview themes included clinical assessment, ambulance DKA fluid therapy, clinical handovers; decision support tool; hospital DKA management; barriers to hospital DKA care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Ambulance capillary blood ketone meter use was deemed feasible, safe and acceptable. Opportunities for improved clinical decision making, support and safety-netting, as well as in-hospital DKA care, were recognised. As participant recruitment was below progression threshold, it is recommended that future-related research considers alternative trial designs. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04940897.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11251,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.15372","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulance clinician use of capillary blood ketone meters to improve emergency hyperglycaemia care: A stepped-wedged controlled, mixed-methods feasibility study\",\"authors\":\"Larissa Stella Prothero,&nbsp;Thomas Strudwick,&nbsp;Theresa Foster,&nbsp;Andrea Kathleen Lake,&nbsp;Adrian Boyle,&nbsp;Allan Clark,&nbsp;Julia Williams,&nbsp;Gerry Rayman,&nbsp;Ketan Dhatariya\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dme.15372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To determine whether it was feasible, safe and acceptable for ambulance clinicians to use capillary blood ketone meters for ‘high-risk’ diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recognition and fluid initiation, to inform the need for a full-powered, multi-centre trial.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adopting a stepped-wedge controlled design, participants with hyperglycaemia (capillary blood glucose &gt;11.0 mmol/L) or diabetes and unwell were recruited. ‘High-risk’ DKA intervention participants (capillary blood ketones ≥3.0 mmol/L) received paramedic-led fluid therapy. Participant demographic and clinical data were collated from ambulance and hospital care records. Twenty ambulance and Emergency Department clinicians were interviewed to understand their hyperglycaemia and DKA care experiences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In this study, 388 participants were recruited (Control: <i>n</i> = 203; Intervention: <i>n</i> = 185). Most presented with hyperglycaemia, and incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes was 18.5% and 74.3%, respectively. Ketone meter use facilitated ‘high-risk’ DKA identification (control: 2.5%, <i>n</i> = 5; intervention: 6.5%, <i>n</i> = 12) and was associated with improved hospital pre-alerting. Ambulance clinicians appeared to have a high index of suspicion for hospital-diagnosed DKA participants. One third (33.3%; <i>n</i> = 3) of Control and almost half (45.5%; <i>n</i> = 5) of Intervention DKA participants received pre-hospital fluid therapy.</p>\\n \\n <p>Key interview themes included clinical assessment, ambulance DKA fluid therapy, clinical handovers; decision support tool; hospital DKA management; barriers to hospital DKA care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ambulance capillary blood ketone meter use was deemed feasible, safe and acceptable. Opportunities for improved clinical decision making, support and safety-netting, as well as in-hospital DKA care, were recognised. As participant recruitment was below progression threshold, it is recommended that future-related research considers alternative trial designs. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04940897.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dme.15372\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.15372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.15372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定救护车临床医生使用毛细血管血酮测定仪识别 "高危 "糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)并开始输液是否可行、安全和可接受,从而为是否需要进行全面的多中心试验提供依据:采用阶梯式对照设计,招募患有高血糖(毛细血管血糖 >11.0 mmol/L)或糖尿病且身体不适的参与者。高危 "DKA干预参与者(毛细血管血酮≥3.0 mmol/L)接受辅助医务人员指导的液体疗法。参与者的人口统计学和临床数据均来自救护车和医院护理记录。对 20 名救护车和急诊科临床医生进行了访谈,以了解他们的高血糖和 DKA 护理经验:本研究共招募了 388 名参与者(对照组:n = 203;干预组:n = 185)。大多数人出现高血糖,1 型和 2 型糖尿病的发病率分别为 18.5% 和 74.3%。酮体计的使用有助于识别 "高危 "DKA(对照组:2.5%,n = 5;干预组:6.5%,n = 12),并与医院预先警报的改善有关。救护车临床医生似乎对医院诊断的 DKA 患者有很高的怀疑指数。三分之一(33.3%;n = 3)的对照组 DKA 患者和近一半(45.5%;n = 5)的干预组 DKA 患者接受了院前输液治疗。关键访谈主题包括临床评估、救护车DKA液体疗法、临床交接、决策支持工具、医院DKA管理、医院DKA护理的障碍:结论:救护车毛细血管血酮测定仪的使用被认为是可行、安全和可接受的。临床决策、支持和安全网以及院内 DKA 护理都有改进的机会。由于参与者招募低于进展阈值,建议未来的相关研究考虑采用其他试验设计:NCT04940897。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ambulance clinician use of capillary blood ketone meters to improve emergency hyperglycaemia care: A stepped-wedged controlled, mixed-methods feasibility study

Aim

To determine whether it was feasible, safe and acceptable for ambulance clinicians to use capillary blood ketone meters for ‘high-risk’ diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) recognition and fluid initiation, to inform the need for a full-powered, multi-centre trial.

Methods

Adopting a stepped-wedge controlled design, participants with hyperglycaemia (capillary blood glucose >11.0 mmol/L) or diabetes and unwell were recruited. ‘High-risk’ DKA intervention participants (capillary blood ketones ≥3.0 mmol/L) received paramedic-led fluid therapy. Participant demographic and clinical data were collated from ambulance and hospital care records. Twenty ambulance and Emergency Department clinicians were interviewed to understand their hyperglycaemia and DKA care experiences.

Results

In this study, 388 participants were recruited (Control: n = 203; Intervention: n = 185). Most presented with hyperglycaemia, and incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes was 18.5% and 74.3%, respectively. Ketone meter use facilitated ‘high-risk’ DKA identification (control: 2.5%, n = 5; intervention: 6.5%, n = 12) and was associated with improved hospital pre-alerting. Ambulance clinicians appeared to have a high index of suspicion for hospital-diagnosed DKA participants. One third (33.3%; n = 3) of Control and almost half (45.5%; n = 5) of Intervention DKA participants received pre-hospital fluid therapy.

Key interview themes included clinical assessment, ambulance DKA fluid therapy, clinical handovers; decision support tool; hospital DKA management; barriers to hospital DKA care.

Conclusions

Ambulance capillary blood ketone meter use was deemed feasible, safe and acceptable. Opportunities for improved clinical decision making, support and safety-netting, as well as in-hospital DKA care, were recognised. As participant recruitment was below progression threshold, it is recommended that future-related research considers alternative trial designs. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04940897.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetic Medicine
Diabetic Medicine 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
229
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetic Medicine, the official journal of Diabetes UK, is published monthly simultaneously, in print and online editions. The journal publishes a range of key information on all clinical aspects of diabetes mellitus, ranging from human genetic studies through clinical physiology and trials to diabetes epidemiology. We do not publish original animal or cell culture studies unless they are part of a study of clinical diabetes involving humans. Categories of publication include research articles, reviews, editorials, commentaries, and correspondence. All material is peer-reviewed. We aim to disseminate knowledge about diabetes research with the goal of improving the management of people with diabetes. The journal therefore seeks to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas between clinicians and researchers worldwide. Topics covered are of importance to all healthcare professionals working with people with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialist services. Surplus generated from the sale of Diabetic Medicine is used by Diabetes UK to know diabetes better and fight diabetes more effectively on behalf of all people affected by and at risk of diabetes as well as their families and carers.”
期刊最新文献
Factors influencing diabetes treatment satisfaction in the INtegrating DEPrEssioN and Diabetes treatmENT randomized clinical trial: A multilevel model analysis. Feasibility of caregiver diabetes distress screening in routine clinical care of youth with type 1 diabetes. Trends in rates of hospitalisation for infection in people with diabetes and the general population. Very-low-calorie diet-based intensive lifestyle intervention for remission of type 2 diabetes: Real-world experience in a South Asian population. 'We're taught green is good': Perspectives on time in range and time in tight range from youth with type 1 diabetes, and parents of youth with type 1 diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1