非感染性葡萄膜炎治疗退出方案登记:3 年后的参与者特征。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2023-324927
David Julian Fink, Jennifer Dell, Carsten Heinz, Maximilian W M Wintergerst, Tobias Höller, Moritz Berger, Matthias Schmid, Karl Thomas Boden, Uwe Pleyer, Herbert Reitsamer, Christoph M E Deuter, Tibor K Lohmann, Robert P Finger
{"title":"非感染性葡萄膜炎治疗退出方案登记:3 年后的参与者特征。","authors":"David Julian Fink, Jennifer Dell, Carsten Heinz, Maximilian W M Wintergerst, Tobias Höller, Moritz Berger, Matthias Schmid, Karl Thomas Boden, Uwe Pleyer, Herbert Reitsamer, Christoph M E Deuter, Tibor K Lohmann, Robert P Finger","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2023-324927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Treatment exit Options For non-infectious Uveitis (TOFU) registry documents disease courses for non-anterior non-infectious uveitis entities with and without treatment to generate more evidence for clinical management recommendations including treatment exit strategies. In this article, we present the participants' baseline characteristics after the first 3 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TOFU is an observational, prospective registry and recruits patients ≥18 years of age with non-anterior non-infectious uveitis with or without a history of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) treatment. The data are collected in the electronic data capture software REDCap and include ophthalmological and general medical history as well as clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 24.10.2019 and 27.12.2022, 628 patients were enrolled at 25 clinical sites in Germany and Austria. Patients with intermediate uveitis were most frequently included (n=252; 40.1%) followed by posterior uveitis (181; 28.8%), panuveitis (n=154; 24.5%) and retinal vasculitis (n=41, 6.5%). At baseline, 39.6% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 22.3% with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, 20.5% with biological (b) DMARDs and 3.6% with other systemic treatments. Average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.69 decimal. Patients with panuveitis had the worst BCVA with 0.63 decimal. Overall, only 8 patients (1.3%) suffered from severe visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of participants required DMARD treatment at baseline, with csDMARDs used more frequently than bDMARDs. The presence of severe visual impairment was low, mostly affecting patients with panuveitis. These findings are in line with comparable monocentric cross-sectional studies of tertiary uveitis centres in Germany and will allow us to generate generalisable evidence in TOFU.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment exit options for non-infectious uveitis registry: participant characteristics at 3 years.\",\"authors\":\"David Julian Fink, Jennifer Dell, Carsten Heinz, Maximilian W M Wintergerst, Tobias Höller, Moritz Berger, Matthias Schmid, Karl Thomas Boden, Uwe Pleyer, Herbert Reitsamer, Christoph M E Deuter, Tibor K Lohmann, Robert P Finger\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2023-324927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Treatment exit Options For non-infectious Uveitis (TOFU) registry documents disease courses for non-anterior non-infectious uveitis entities with and without treatment to generate more evidence for clinical management recommendations including treatment exit strategies. In this article, we present the participants' baseline characteristics after the first 3 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TOFU is an observational, prospective registry and recruits patients ≥18 years of age with non-anterior non-infectious uveitis with or without a history of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) treatment. The data are collected in the electronic data capture software REDCap and include ophthalmological and general medical history as well as clinical findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 24.10.2019 and 27.12.2022, 628 patients were enrolled at 25 clinical sites in Germany and Austria. Patients with intermediate uveitis were most frequently included (n=252; 40.1%) followed by posterior uveitis (181; 28.8%), panuveitis (n=154; 24.5%) and retinal vasculitis (n=41, 6.5%). At baseline, 39.6% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 22.3% with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, 20.5% with biological (b) DMARDs and 3.6% with other systemic treatments. Average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.69 decimal. Patients with panuveitis had the worst BCVA with 0.63 decimal. Overall, only 8 patients (1.3%) suffered from severe visual impairment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than half of participants required DMARD treatment at baseline, with csDMARDs used more frequently than bDMARDs. The presence of severe visual impairment was low, mostly affecting patients with panuveitis. These findings are in line with comparable monocentric cross-sectional studies of tertiary uveitis centres in Germany and will allow us to generate generalisable evidence in TOFU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2023-324927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非感染性葡萄膜炎治疗退出方案(TOFU)登记记录了接受治疗和未接受治疗的非前部非感染性葡萄膜炎患者的病程,为临床管理建议(包括治疗退出策略)提供更多证据。在本文中,我们将介绍前三年参与者的基线特征:TOFU是一项观察性、前瞻性登记项目,招募年龄≥18岁的非前部非感染性葡萄膜炎患者,无论其既往是否接受过改变病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)治疗。数据通过电子数据采集软件REDCap收集,包括眼科和一般病史以及临床结果:2019年10月24日至2022年12月27日期间,德国和奥地利的25个临床研究机构共招募了628名患者。中间葡萄膜炎患者最多(252人,占40.1%),其次是后葡萄膜炎(181人,占28.8%)、泛葡萄膜炎(154人,占24.5%)和视网膜血管炎(41人,占6.5%)。基线时,39.6%的患者接受全身皮质类固醇治疗,22.3%接受传统合成(cs)DMARDs治疗,20.5%接受生物(b)DMARDs治疗,3.6%接受其他全身治疗。平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为小数点后 0.69 位。泛葡萄膜炎患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)最差,为小数点后 0.63。总体而言,只有8名患者(1.3%)出现严重视力损伤:不到一半的参与者在基线时需要接受DMARD治疗,其中csDMARD的使用频率高于bDMARD。出现严重视力损伤的比例较低,主要是泛葡萄膜炎患者。这些发现与德国三级葡萄膜炎中心的同类单中心横断面研究结果一致,将使我们能够为TOFU提供可推广的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment exit options for non-infectious uveitis registry: participant characteristics at 3 years.

Purpose: The Treatment exit Options For non-infectious Uveitis (TOFU) registry documents disease courses for non-anterior non-infectious uveitis entities with and without treatment to generate more evidence for clinical management recommendations including treatment exit strategies. In this article, we present the participants' baseline characteristics after the first 3 years.

Methods: TOFU is an observational, prospective registry and recruits patients ≥18 years of age with non-anterior non-infectious uveitis with or without a history of previous disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) treatment. The data are collected in the electronic data capture software REDCap and include ophthalmological and general medical history as well as clinical findings.

Results: Between 24.10.2019 and 27.12.2022, 628 patients were enrolled at 25 clinical sites in Germany and Austria. Patients with intermediate uveitis were most frequently included (n=252; 40.1%) followed by posterior uveitis (181; 28.8%), panuveitis (n=154; 24.5%) and retinal vasculitis (n=41, 6.5%). At baseline, 39.6% were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 22.3% with conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs, 20.5% with biological (b) DMARDs and 3.6% with other systemic treatments. Average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.69 decimal. Patients with panuveitis had the worst BCVA with 0.63 decimal. Overall, only 8 patients (1.3%) suffered from severe visual impairment.

Conclusions: Less than half of participants required DMARD treatment at baseline, with csDMARDs used more frequently than bDMARDs. The presence of severe visual impairment was low, mostly affecting patients with panuveitis. These findings are in line with comparable monocentric cross-sectional studies of tertiary uveitis centres in Germany and will allow us to generate generalisable evidence in TOFU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Impact of microorganism virulence on endophthalmitis outcomes Progressive inner retinal neurodegeneration in non-proliferative macular telangiectasia type 2 Effect of intravenous methylprednisolone on serum antibody levels in thyroid eye disease The aqueous humour dynamics in primary angle closure disease: a computational study Retinal curvature in Chinese children with myopia measured by ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1