{"title":"[使用地笼对胡蜂菰传播的影响]。","authors":"M Zhong, X Lu, S Fang, X Jiang, W Gu, Z Xiang","doi":"10.16250/j.32.1374.2023219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effect of ground cage use on <i>Oncomelania hupensis</i> spread, so as to provide insights into precision snail control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty ground cages that were frequently used to capture rice field eels were purchased, including 11 packaging tape-made cages, 7 plastic cages and 2 nylon rope-made cages. The eel-capturing activity was mimicked, and 20 ground cages were assigned in settings with relatively high (1.00 snail/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> and higher) and low snail densities (< 1.00 snail/0.1 m<sup>2</sup>) in Xindai Township, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province during the period from 15 : 00 to 8 : 00 of the following day on April 13, 26 and 28. The numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages were compared in settings with different types of snail densities using the rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 cage-times were assigned in settings with a high snail density, and a total of 77 snails were captured, with a mean number of 7 snails in each cage-time and 2.15 snails in 0.1 m<sup>2</sup> ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made and plastic cages were 2.47 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage and 0.37 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage, respectively. A total of 24 cage-times were assigned in settings with a low snail density, and a total of 8 snails were captured, with a mean number of 0.33 snails in each cage-time and 0.09 snails in 0.1 m<sup>2</sup> ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages were 0.12 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage; however, no snails were carried by plastic or nylon rope-made cages. The number of snails carried by ground cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (<i>Z</i> = -4.019, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and the number of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (<i>Z</i> = -4.086, <i>P</i> < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ground cage in snail habitats is a contributor to snail spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":38874,"journal":{"name":"中国血吸虫病防治杂志","volume":"36 2","pages":"198-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of ground cage use on <i>Oncomelania hupensis</i> spread].\",\"authors\":\"M Zhong, X Lu, S Fang, X Jiang, W Gu, Z Xiang\",\"doi\":\"10.16250/j.32.1374.2023219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effect of ground cage use on <i>Oncomelania hupensis</i> spread, so as to provide insights into precision snail control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty ground cages that were frequently used to capture rice field eels were purchased, including 11 packaging tape-made cages, 7 plastic cages and 2 nylon rope-made cages. The eel-capturing activity was mimicked, and 20 ground cages were assigned in settings with relatively high (1.00 snail/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> and higher) and low snail densities (< 1.00 snail/0.1 m<sup>2</sup>) in Xindai Township, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province during the period from 15 : 00 to 8 : 00 of the following day on April 13, 26 and 28. The numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages were compared in settings with different types of snail densities using the rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11 cage-times were assigned in settings with a high snail density, and a total of 77 snails were captured, with a mean number of 7 snails in each cage-time and 2.15 snails in 0.1 m<sup>2</sup> ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made and plastic cages were 2.47 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage and 0.37 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage, respectively. A total of 24 cage-times were assigned in settings with a low snail density, and a total of 8 snails were captured, with a mean number of 0.33 snails in each cage-time and 0.09 snails in 0.1 m<sup>2</sup> ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages were 0.12 snails/0.1 m<sup>2</sup> cage; however, no snails were carried by plastic or nylon rope-made cages. The number of snails carried by ground cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (<i>Z</i> = -4.019, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and the number of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (<i>Z</i> = -4.086, <i>P</i> < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of ground cage in snail habitats is a contributor to snail spread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国血吸虫病防治杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"198-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国血吸虫病防治杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2023219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国血吸虫病防治杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16250/j.32.1374.2023219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Effect of ground cage use on Oncomelania hupensis spread].
Objective: To examine the effect of ground cage use on Oncomelania hupensis spread, so as to provide insights into precision snail control.
Methods: Twenty ground cages that were frequently used to capture rice field eels were purchased, including 11 packaging tape-made cages, 7 plastic cages and 2 nylon rope-made cages. The eel-capturing activity was mimicked, and 20 ground cages were assigned in settings with relatively high (1.00 snail/0.1 m2 and higher) and low snail densities (< 1.00 snail/0.1 m2) in Xindai Township, Pinghu City, Zhejiang Province during the period from 15 : 00 to 8 : 00 of the following day on April 13, 26 and 28. The numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages were compared in settings with different types of snail densities using the rank-sum test.
Results: A total of 11 cage-times were assigned in settings with a high snail density, and a total of 77 snails were captured, with a mean number of 7 snails in each cage-time and 2.15 snails in 0.1 m2 ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made and plastic cages were 2.47 snails/0.1 m2 cage and 0.37 snails/0.1 m2 cage, respectively. A total of 24 cage-times were assigned in settings with a low snail density, and a total of 8 snails were captured, with a mean number of 0.33 snails in each cage-time and 0.09 snails in 0.1 m2 ground cage. The mean numbers of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages were 0.12 snails/0.1 m2 cage; however, no snails were carried by plastic or nylon rope-made cages. The number of snails carried by ground cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (Z = -4.019, P < 0.01), and the number of snails carried by packaging tape-made cages was higher in settings with a high snail density than in settings with a low snail density (Z = -4.086, P < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the numbers of snails carried by different types of ground cages.
Conclusions: The use of ground cage in snail habitats is a contributor to snail spread.
期刊介绍：
Chinese Journal of Schistosomiasis Control (ISSN: 1005-6661, CN: 32-1374/R), founded in 1989, is a technical and scientific journal under the supervision of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission and organised by Jiangsu Institute of Schistosomiasis Control. It is a scientific and technical journal under the supervision of Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission and sponsored by Jiangsu Institute of Schistosomiasis Prevention and Control. The journal carries out the policy of prevention-oriented, control-oriented, nationwide and grassroots, adheres to the tenet of scientific research service for the prevention and treatment of schistosomiasis and other parasitic diseases, and mainly publishes academic papers reflecting the latest achievements and dynamics of prevention and treatment of schistosomiasis and other parasitic diseases, scientific research and management, etc. The main columns are Guest Contributions, Experts‘ Commentary, Experts’ Perspectives, Experts' Forums, Theses, Prevention and Treatment Research, Experimental Research, The main columns include Guest Contributions, Expert Commentaries, Expert Perspectives, Expert Forums, Treatises, Prevention and Control Studies, Experimental Studies, Clinical Studies, Prevention and Control Experiences, Prevention and Control Management, Reviews, Case Reports, and Information, etc. The journal is a useful reference material for the professional and technical personnel of schistosomiasis and parasitic disease prevention and control research, management workers, and teachers and students of medical schools.
The journal is now included in important domestic databases, such as Chinese Core List (8th edition), China Science Citation Database (Core Edition), China Science and Technology Core Journals (Statistical Source Journals), and is also included in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Chemical Abstract, Embase, Zoological Record, JSTChina, Ulrichsweb, Western Pacific Region Index Medicus, CABI and other international authoritative databases.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
