功能性神经紊乱(FND)的疾病认知、耻辱感体验和参与度:探索多学科小组教育课程的作用。

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633
Cate Bailey, Niruj Agrawal, Sarah Cope, Barnaby Proctor, Bridget Mildon, Matt Butler, Kate Holt, Mark Edwards, Norman Poole, Timothy R Nicholson
{"title":"功能性神经紊乱(FND)的疾病认知、耻辱感体验和参与度:探索多学科小组教育课程的作用。","authors":"Cate Bailey, Niruj Agrawal, Sarah Cope, Barnaby Proctor, Bridget Mildon, Matt Butler, Kate Holt, Mark Edwards, Norman Poole, Timothy R Nicholson","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A critical first step in managing functional neurological disorder (FND) is a positive diagnosis and clear explanation using an understandable illness model. Multidisciplinary group education sessions are one way to achieve this, with some evidence they improve understanding, confidence in diagnosis and outcomes with further treatment. In many conditions, illness perceptions and stigma affect distress, functioning, quality of life and engagement. Exploring relationships between these factors could lead to deeper understanding of the impact of education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, quality of life, mood, anxiety, comorbidities, treatment engagement and stigma (both experienced and anticipated) were completed before, immediately and 1 month after a multidisciplinary online group education session for FND at a regional neurosciences centre. Free-text data on causal attributions and needs were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>166 patients attended online education sessions from January 2022 to July 2023; 61 (37%) completed presession surveys, 42 (25%) completed postsession and 35 (21%) completed 1 month postsession surveys. Patients reported multiple comorbidities, poor quality of life, functioning and high levels of stigma. Illness perception scores indicated FND as threatening, mysterious and unpredictable, with low personal or treatment control over symptoms. Illness coherence/understanding (mean difference 2.27, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.23) and engagement (mean difference 2.42, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.36) increased after the session. There were no significant changes in stigma, distress, sense of control or anticipated discrimination. Free-text analysis revealed stress and trauma as the most common causal attributions, followed by physical illnesses. Patients requested personalised formulations, practical disability advice, help with explaining the condition to others (eg, employers), peer support and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary group FND education sessions potentially improve patient understanding and engagement. Clinicians should consider the possible benefits of personalised formulations and linking to practical and peer support. Further work assessing illness perceptions is needed, such as adapting measures for FND.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":"6 1","pages":"e000633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illness perceptions, experiences of stigma and engagement in functional neurological disorder (FND): exploring the role of multidisciplinary group education sessions.\",\"authors\":\"Cate Bailey, Niruj Agrawal, Sarah Cope, Barnaby Proctor, Bridget Mildon, Matt Butler, Kate Holt, Mark Edwards, Norman Poole, Timothy R Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A critical first step in managing functional neurological disorder (FND) is a positive diagnosis and clear explanation using an understandable illness model. Multidisciplinary group education sessions are one way to achieve this, with some evidence they improve understanding, confidence in diagnosis and outcomes with further treatment. In many conditions, illness perceptions and stigma affect distress, functioning, quality of life and engagement. Exploring relationships between these factors could lead to deeper understanding of the impact of education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, quality of life, mood, anxiety, comorbidities, treatment engagement and stigma (both experienced and anticipated) were completed before, immediately and 1 month after a multidisciplinary online group education session for FND at a regional neurosciences centre. Free-text data on causal attributions and needs were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>166 patients attended online education sessions from January 2022 to July 2023; 61 (37%) completed presession surveys, 42 (25%) completed postsession and 35 (21%) completed 1 month postsession surveys. Patients reported multiple comorbidities, poor quality of life, functioning and high levels of stigma. Illness perception scores indicated FND as threatening, mysterious and unpredictable, with low personal or treatment control over symptoms. Illness coherence/understanding (mean difference 2.27, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.23) and engagement (mean difference 2.42, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.36) increased after the session. There were no significant changes in stigma, distress, sense of control or anticipated discrimination. Free-text analysis revealed stress and trauma as the most common causal attributions, followed by physical illnesses. Patients requested personalised formulations, practical disability advice, help with explaining the condition to others (eg, employers), peer support and treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary group FND education sessions potentially improve patient understanding and engagement. Clinicians should consider the possible benefits of personalised formulations and linking to practical and peer support. Further work assessing illness perceptions is needed, such as adapting measures for FND.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e000633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2024-000633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:管理功能性神经紊乱(FND)的关键第一步是做出积极的诊断,并使用易于理解的疾病模型做出清晰的解释。多学科小组教育课程是实现这一目标的途径之一,有证据表明,这些课程能提高对疾病的理解、对诊断的信心以及进一步治疗的效果。在许多情况下,对疾病的认知和耻辱感会影响患者的痛苦、功能、生活质量和参与度。探索这些因素之间的关系可以加深对教育影响的理解:方法:在地区神经科学中心开展 FND 多学科在线小组教育课程之前、之时和之后 1 个月,填写了评估疾病认知、生活质量、情绪、焦虑、并发症、治疗参与度和耻辱感(包括经历的和预期的)的调查问卷。此外,还收集了有关因果关系和需求的自由文本数据:166 名患者参加了 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月的在线教育课程;61 人(37%)完成了课前调查,42 人(25%)完成了课后调查,35 人(21%)完成了 1 个月的课后调查。患者表示患有多种并发症,生活质量和功能较差,耻辱感较强。疾病感知评分表明,FND 具有威胁性、神秘性和不可预测性,个人或治疗对症状的控制力较低。疾病的连贯性/理解力(平均差异为 2.27,P=0.01):多学科 FND 集体教育课程有可能增进患者的理解和参与。临床医生应考虑个性化配方和联系实际与同伴支持可能带来的益处。还需要进一步开展疾病认知评估工作,例如针对 FND 调整测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illness perceptions, experiences of stigma and engagement in functional neurological disorder (FND): exploring the role of multidisciplinary group education sessions.

Background: A critical first step in managing functional neurological disorder (FND) is a positive diagnosis and clear explanation using an understandable illness model. Multidisciplinary group education sessions are one way to achieve this, with some evidence they improve understanding, confidence in diagnosis and outcomes with further treatment. In many conditions, illness perceptions and stigma affect distress, functioning, quality of life and engagement. Exploring relationships between these factors could lead to deeper understanding of the impact of education.

Methods: Questionnaires assessing illness perceptions, quality of life, mood, anxiety, comorbidities, treatment engagement and stigma (both experienced and anticipated) were completed before, immediately and 1 month after a multidisciplinary online group education session for FND at a regional neurosciences centre. Free-text data on causal attributions and needs were also collected.

Results: 166 patients attended online education sessions from January 2022 to July 2023; 61 (37%) completed presession surveys, 42 (25%) completed postsession and 35 (21%) completed 1 month postsession surveys. Patients reported multiple comorbidities, poor quality of life, functioning and high levels of stigma. Illness perception scores indicated FND as threatening, mysterious and unpredictable, with low personal or treatment control over symptoms. Illness coherence/understanding (mean difference 2.27, p<0.01, 95% CI 1.22 to 4.23) and engagement (mean difference 2.42, p<0.01, 95% CI 0.46 to 4.36) increased after the session. There were no significant changes in stigma, distress, sense of control or anticipated discrimination. Free-text analysis revealed stress and trauma as the most common causal attributions, followed by physical illnesses. Patients requested personalised formulations, practical disability advice, help with explaining the condition to others (eg, employers), peer support and treatment.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary group FND education sessions potentially improve patient understanding and engagement. Clinicians should consider the possible benefits of personalised formulations and linking to practical and peer support. Further work assessing illness perceptions is needed, such as adapting measures for FND.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Undiagnosed major risk factors in acute ischaemic stroke patients in Qatar: analysis from the Qatar stroke registry. Late-onset myopathy responsive to immunomodulatory treatment: sporadic late-onset nemaline myopathy without nemaline rods? Catatonia in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a case series and approach to improve outcomes with electroconvulsive therapy. Analysis of door-to-needle time for thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke using statistical process control charts. Statins are rarely prescribed for incidentally discovered covert cerebrovascular disease: a retrospective cohort in a large electronic health record (EHR) identified using natural language processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1