在生物标志物分层试验中对生物标志物阳性和阴性亚组进行高效测试。

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae056
Lang Li, Anastasia Ivanova
{"title":"在生物标志物分层试验中对生物标志物阳性和阴性亚组进行高效测试。","authors":"Lang Li, Anastasia Ivanova","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many randomized placebo-controlled trials with a biomarker defined subgroup, it is believed that this subgroup has the same or higher treatment effect compared with its complement. These subgroups are often referred to as the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. Most biomarker-stratified pivotal trials are aimed at demonstrating a significant treatment effect either in the biomarker positive subgroup or in the overall population. A major shortcoming of this approach is that the treatment can be declared effective in the overall population even though it has no effect in the biomarker negative subgroup. We use the isotonic assumption about the treatment effects in the two subgroups to construct an efficient way to test for a treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. A substantial reduction in the required sample size for such a trial compared with existing methods makes evaluating the treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups feasible in pivotal trials especially when the prevalence of the biomarker positive subgroup is less than 0.5.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficient testing of the biomarker positive and negative subgroups in a biomarker-stratified trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lang Li, Anastasia Ivanova\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/biomtc/ujae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many randomized placebo-controlled trials with a biomarker defined subgroup, it is believed that this subgroup has the same or higher treatment effect compared with its complement. These subgroups are often referred to as the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. Most biomarker-stratified pivotal trials are aimed at demonstrating a significant treatment effect either in the biomarker positive subgroup or in the overall population. A major shortcoming of this approach is that the treatment can be declared effective in the overall population even though it has no effect in the biomarker negative subgroup. We use the isotonic assumption about the treatment effects in the two subgroups to construct an efficient way to test for a treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. A substantial reduction in the required sample size for such a trial compared with existing methods makes evaluating the treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups feasible in pivotal trials especially when the prevalence of the biomarker positive subgroup is less than 0.5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biometrics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae056\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多随机安慰剂对照试验中,有一个生物标志物定义的亚组,人们认为该亚组与其互补组相比具有相同或更高的治疗效果。这些亚组通常被称为生物标志物阳性亚组和阴性亚组。大多数生物标志物分层关键性试验的目的是在生物标志物阳性亚组或总体人群中证明显著的治疗效果。这种方法的一个主要缺点是,即使在生物标志物阴性亚组中没有效果,也可以宣布治疗在总体人群中有效。我们利用两个亚组中治疗效果的同调假设,构建了一种在生物标志物阳性亚组和阴性亚组中检验治疗效果的有效方法。与现有方法相比,这种试验所需的样本量大大减少,因此在关键试验中评估生物标志物阳性亚组和阴性亚组的治疗效果是可行的,尤其是当生物标志物阳性亚组的发病率低于 0.5 时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficient testing of the biomarker positive and negative subgroups in a biomarker-stratified trial.

In many randomized placebo-controlled trials with a biomarker defined subgroup, it is believed that this subgroup has the same or higher treatment effect compared with its complement. These subgroups are often referred to as the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. Most biomarker-stratified pivotal trials are aimed at demonstrating a significant treatment effect either in the biomarker positive subgroup or in the overall population. A major shortcoming of this approach is that the treatment can be declared effective in the overall population even though it has no effect in the biomarker negative subgroup. We use the isotonic assumption about the treatment effects in the two subgroups to construct an efficient way to test for a treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups. A substantial reduction in the required sample size for such a trial compared with existing methods makes evaluating the treatment effect in both the biomarker positive and negative subgroups feasible in pivotal trials especially when the prevalence of the biomarker positive subgroup is less than 0.5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
期刊最新文献
Bayesian pathway analysis over brain network mediators for survival data. Robust model averaging approach by Mallows-type criterion. Bayesian inference for multivariate probit model with latent envelope. Absolute risk from double nested case-control designs: cause-specific proportional hazards models with and without augmented estimating equations. Nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve analysis with an imperfect gold standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1