João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti
{"title":"Smartpaddle® 作为一种新的监测功能:基于惯性测量单元和应变计的系留游泳力装置之间的比较。","authors":"João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PF<sub>IMU</sub> and MF<sub>IMU</sub>) and SG (PF<sub>SG</sub> and MF<sub>SG</sub>) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PF<sub>SG</sub> = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.88) and mean (MF<sub>SG</sub> = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, <i>p</i> = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 6","pages":"670-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> as a New Monitoring Feature: A Comparison Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Strain Gauge-Based Devices on Tethered Swimming Forces.\",\"authors\":\"João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PF<sub>IMU</sub> and MF<sub>IMU</sub>) and SG (PF<sub>SG</sub> and MF<sub>SG</sub>) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PF<sub>SG</sub> = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.88) and mean (MF<sub>SG</sub> = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, <i>p</i> = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"670-681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
Smartpaddle® as a New Monitoring Feature: A Comparison Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Strain Gauge-Based Devices on Tethered Swimming Forces.
Smartpaddle® is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle® and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PFIMU and MFIMU) and SG (PFSG and MFSG) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PFSG = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, p < 0.001, r = 0.88) and mean (MFSG = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, p < 0.001, r = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PFIMU = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, p = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MFIMU = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, p = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.