Smartpaddle® 作为一种新的监测功能:基于惯性测量单元和应变计的系留游泳力装置之间的比较。

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-05-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti
{"title":"Smartpaddle® 作为一种新的监测功能:基于惯性测量单元和应变计的系留游泳力装置之间的比较。","authors":"João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PF<sub>IMU</sub> and MF<sub>IMU</sub>) and SG (PF<sub>SG</sub> and MF<sub>SG</sub>) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PF<sub>SG</sub> = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.88) and mean (MF<sub>SG</sub> = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, <i>p</i> = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 6","pages":"670-681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> as a New Monitoring Feature: A Comparison Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Strain Gauge-Based Devices on Tethered Swimming Forces.\",\"authors\":\"João Octavio R P DE Campos, Felipe A Ribeiro, Gabriel Luches-Pereira, Marcelo Papoti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle<sup>®</sup> and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PF<sub>IMU</sub> and MF<sub>IMU</sub>) and SG (PF<sub>SG</sub> and MF<sub>SG</sub>) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PF<sub>SG</sub> = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.88) and mean (MF<sub>SG</sub> = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>r</i> = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PF<sub>IMU</sub> = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, <i>p</i> = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MF<sub>IMU</sub> = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, <i>p</i> = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 6\",\"pages\":\"670-681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166138/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Smartpaddle® 是一种基于惯性测量单元(IMU)的新型可穿戴设备,用于游泳中的现场手臂划水动力学和运动学分析。然而,由于缺乏有关其一致性和可靠性的数据,加上原始数据的获取受到限制,因此有必要将其与用于评估游泳力的成熟应变计(SG)参考方法进行对比评估。因此,本研究旨在调查 Smartpaddle® 和应变仪在 30 秒全力以赴的单臂系绳游泳测试中的一致性和可靠性。12 名训练有素的年轻成年游泳运动员进行了 30 秒钟的重复测试,全程仅靠双臂系绳游泳。同时从 IMU(PFIMU 和 MFIMU)和 SG(PFSG 和 MFSG)获得峰值力和平均力。发现设备之间的峰值力(PFSG = 158.46 ± 48.85 N,PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N,p < 0.001,r = 0.88)和平均力(MFSG = 69.62 ± 16.36 N,MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N,p < 0.001,r = 0.84)存在统计差异和相关性,这两个变量的系统误差均有所上升。在测试-重复测试条件下,IMU 数据在峰值(PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N,PFIMU = 75.45 ± 11.54 N,p = 0.99,ICC = 0.96)和平均(MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N,MFIMU = 30.21 ± 5.83 N,p = 0.80,ICC = 0.95)力方面均未发现差异,系统误差可忽略不计。总之,虽然 Smartpaddle® 设备不能直接与应变片参考方法进行比较,但它在重复测试试验中表现出了很高的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Smartpaddle® as a New Monitoring Feature: A Comparison Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Strain Gauge-Based Devices on Tethered Swimming Forces.

Smartpaddle® is a novel wearable device based on inertial measurement units (IMU) for in-field arm-stroke kinetics and kinematics analysis in swimming. However, the lack of data regarding its agreement and reliability, coupled with restricted access to raw data, emphasizes the need to evaluate it against a well-established strain gauge (SG) reference method for assessing swimming forces. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the agreement and reliability between the Smartpaddle® and strain gauge in a 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming test. Twelve trained young adult swimmers performed a test-retest 30-s all-out arms-only tethered swimming trial. Peak and mean forces were obtained from IMU (PFIMU and MFIMU) and SG (PFSG and MFSG) simultaneously. Statistical differences and correlations were found in both peak (PFSG = 158.46 ± 48.85 N, PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, p < 0.001, r = 0.88) and mean (MFSG = 69.62 ± 16.36 N, MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, p < 0.001, r = 0.84) forces between devices, presenting elevated systematic errors for both variables. No differences were found in IMU data between test-retest conditions in both peak (PFIMU = 75.47 ± 12.05 N, PFIMU = 75.45 ± 11.54 N, p = 0.99, ICC = 0.96) and mean (MFIMU = 30.06 ± 5.42 N, MFIMU = 30.21 ± 5.83 N, p = 0.80, ICC = 0.95) forces, with negligible systematic errors. In conclusion, although the Smartpaddle® device is not directly comparable to the strain gauge reference method, it has demonstrated high reliability levels in test-retest trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Mental Fatigue Induced by the Stroop Test on Muscular Endurance Performance and Neuromuscular Activation in Division III Female Athletes. Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity of a Commercially Available Velocity Measuring Device When Performing Selected Exercises. Effects of Different Warm-up Protocols on the Cardiopulmonary Responses to Exercise Testing in Youth. Relative Age Effect for Different Playing Positions in Adolescent Female Volleyball Players. A Comparison of Achilles Tendon Morphological Characteristics Based Upon VISA-A Score in Active Adults Over Age 50.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1