骨质疏松症中肠道微生物群组成的干扰:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s00774-024-01517-3
Yun Cao, Yemei Gao, Jiaqin Huang
{"title":"骨质疏松症中肠道微生物群组成的干扰:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yun Cao, Yemei Gao, Jiaqin Huang","doi":"10.1007/s00774-024-01517-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoporosis (OP) is a chronic bone metabolic disease, which causes a great social and economic burden. The gut microbiota (GM) has become a recent topic of interest in the role of many disease states. Changes in the GM are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial. We performed a mate-analysis to explore and compare the alterations of GM in OP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang. In addition, we applied the Stata 17.0 software for data analysis. Bias controls were evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, and Egger's and Begg's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This research ultimately considered 16 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2340 people (664 with OP and 1676 healthy controls). The pooled estimate showed an increase of borderline significance on ACE index in patients with OP compared with control participants (SMD = 1.05; 95% CI 0.00-2.10; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in Chao1, Shannon and Simpson indices. At the phylum level, no significant differences were observed between the OP patients and HCs in the overall analysis. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Blautia presented a decrease of borderline significance between OP and the control group (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.00, P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with OP may exhibit dysbiosis in their gut microbiota, characterized by a reduction in certain anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria and an enrichment of pro-inflammatory bacterial populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"551-563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yun Cao, Yemei Gao, Jiaqin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00774-024-01517-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoporosis (OP) is a chronic bone metabolic disease, which causes a great social and economic burden. The gut microbiota (GM) has become a recent topic of interest in the role of many disease states. Changes in the GM are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial. We performed a mate-analysis to explore and compare the alterations of GM in OP patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang. In addition, we applied the Stata 17.0 software for data analysis. Bias controls were evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, and Egger's and Begg's tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This research ultimately considered 16 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2340 people (664 with OP and 1676 healthy controls). The pooled estimate showed an increase of borderline significance on ACE index in patients with OP compared with control participants (SMD = 1.05; 95% CI 0.00-2.10; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in Chao1, Shannon and Simpson indices. At the phylum level, no significant differences were observed between the OP patients and HCs in the overall analysis. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Blautia presented a decrease of borderline significance between OP and the control group (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.00, P = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with OP may exhibit dysbiosis in their gut microbiota, characterized by a reduction in certain anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria and an enrichment of pro-inflammatory bacterial populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01517-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01517-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言骨质疏松症(OP)是一种慢性骨代谢疾病,造成了巨大的社会和经济负担。肠道微生物群(GM)在许多疾病状态中的作用已成为近期备受关注的话题。肠道微生物群的变化与骨量和骨质的维持有关。然而,这一领域的研究结果仍存在很大争议。我们进行了一项配对分析,以探讨和比较 OP 患者 GM 的变化:根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA),我们全面检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、CNKI、VIP、CBM 和 Wanfang 等数据库。此外,我们还使用 Stata 17.0 软件进行了数据分析。通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)、漏斗图分析、Egger 检验和 Begg 检验对偏倚控制进行了评估:这项研究最终考虑了 16 项研究,其中包括 2340 人(664 人患有 OP,1676 人为健康对照组)的粪便转基因数据。汇总估算结果显示,与对照组相比,OP 患者的 ACE 指数有边缘显著性增加(SMD = 1.05;95% CI 0.00-2.10;P = 0.05)。Chao1、Shannon和Simpson指数无明显差异。在门一级,总体分析未观察到 OP 患者与 HC 之间存在显著差异。在属的层面上,OP 组与对照组之间 Blautia 的相对丰度呈边缘显著性下降(SMD = - 0.32,95% CI - 0.65 至 - 0.00,P = 0.05):本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,OP 患者的肠道微生物群可能出现菌群失调,其特点是某些产生丁酸的抗炎细菌减少,而促炎细菌群增多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perturbations in gut microbiota composition in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Osteoporosis (OP) is a chronic bone metabolic disease, which causes a great social and economic burden. The gut microbiota (GM) has become a recent topic of interest in the role of many disease states. Changes in the GM are correlated with the maintenance of bone mass and bone quality. However, research results in this field remain highly controversial. We performed a mate-analysis to explore and compare the alterations of GM in OP patients.

Materials and methods: According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), we comprehensively searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM, and Wanfang. In addition, we applied the Stata 17.0 software for data analysis. Bias controls were evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), funnel plot analysis, and Egger's and Begg's tests.

Results: This research ultimately considered 16 studies, which included the fecal GM data of 2340 people (664 with OP and 1676 healthy controls). The pooled estimate showed an increase of borderline significance on ACE index in patients with OP compared with control participants (SMD = 1.05; 95% CI 0.00-2.10; P = 0.05). There were no significant differences in Chao1, Shannon and Simpson indices. At the phylum level, no significant differences were observed between the OP patients and HCs in the overall analysis. At the genus level, the relative abundance of Blautia presented a decrease of borderline significance between OP and the control group (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI - 0.65 to - 0.00, P = 0.05).

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with OP may exhibit dysbiosis in their gut microbiota, characterized by a reduction in certain anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria and an enrichment of pro-inflammatory bacterial populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Osteoporosis screening using X-ray assessment and osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians in hip surgery patients. Responders and non-responders to romosozumab treatment. Multiple thyroid disorders and risk of osteoporosis: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Histological assessments for anabolic effects in teriparatide/abaloparatide administered rodent models. List of reviewers 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1