基于三级医疗机构的回顾性队列研究:耐头孢他啶-阿维菌素卡巴培南耐药肺炎克雷伯菌感染的临床特征和预后。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3427972
Fatema Ahmed, Betsy Abraham, Nermin Kamal Saeed, Hasan Mohamed Naser, Kannan Sridharan
{"title":"基于三级医疗机构的回顾性队列研究:耐头孢他啶-阿维菌素卡巴培南耐药肺炎克雷伯菌感染的临床特征和预后。","authors":"Fatema Ahmed, Betsy Abraham, Nermin Kamal Saeed, Hasan Mohamed Naser, Kannan Sridharan","doi":"10.1155/2024/3427972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The advent of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant carbapenem-resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (CRKP) isolates has been steadily documented in recent years. We aimed to identify risk factors of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP infection and assess clinical outcomes of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study retrospectively examined the clinical and microbiological data of patients with ceftazidime avibactam susceptible and ceftazidime avibactam-resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infection to identify risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 patients with CRKP infection were enrolled in this study. Patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates (20/34 = 58.8%) had prior exposure to carbapenems (<i>p</i>=0.003) and had more tracheostomies (16/34 = 47.1%) (<i>p</i>=0.001). Only 8/28 (28.6%) patients with CAZ-AVI susceptible CRKP isolates died amongst those administered ceftazidime-avibactam compared to 49/90 (54.4%) who did not receive the same (<i>p</i>=0.016). 1/9 (11.1%) patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates who received colistin died compared to 13/25 (52%) who did not receive colistin (<i>p</i>=0.03). There was no association between presence of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates and overall mortality (odds ratio: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.6), and no independent predictors of risk factors to overall mortality in the group with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early advent of CAZ-AVI resistance in CRE isolates highlights the dynamic necessity of routine CAZ-AVI resistance laboratory testing and antimicrobial stewardship programmes focusing on the utilization of all antibiotics. Consolidating the hospital infection control of tracheostomies may help to prevent CAZ resistance in CRKP. Colistin may aid in decreasing of mortality rates among patients with CAZ-AVI CRKP isolates.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Tertiary Care-Based Cohort Study on Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Fatema Ahmed, Betsy Abraham, Nermin Kamal Saeed, Hasan Mohamed Naser, Kannan Sridharan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/3427972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The advent of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant carbapenem-resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> (CRKP) isolates has been steadily documented in recent years. We aimed to identify risk factors of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP infection and assess clinical outcomes of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study retrospectively examined the clinical and microbiological data of patients with ceftazidime avibactam susceptible and ceftazidime avibactam-resistant <i>Klebsiella pneumonia</i> carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infection to identify risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes using multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 152 patients with CRKP infection were enrolled in this study. Patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates (20/34 = 58.8%) had prior exposure to carbapenems (<i>p</i>=0.003) and had more tracheostomies (16/34 = 47.1%) (<i>p</i>=0.001). Only 8/28 (28.6%) patients with CAZ-AVI susceptible CRKP isolates died amongst those administered ceftazidime-avibactam compared to 49/90 (54.4%) who did not receive the same (<i>p</i>=0.016). 1/9 (11.1%) patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates who received colistin died compared to 13/25 (52%) who did not receive colistin (<i>p</i>=0.03). There was no association between presence of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates and overall mortality (odds ratio: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.6), and no independent predictors of risk factors to overall mortality in the group with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early advent of CAZ-AVI resistance in CRE isolates highlights the dynamic necessity of routine CAZ-AVI resistance laboratory testing and antimicrobial stewardship programmes focusing on the utilization of all antibiotics. Consolidating the hospital infection control of tracheostomies may help to prevent CAZ resistance in CRKP. Colistin may aid in decreasing of mortality rates among patients with CAZ-AVI CRKP isolates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3427972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3427972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:近年来,耐头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)分离株的出现不断被记录下来。我们旨在确定耐 CAZ-AVI CRKP 感染的风险因素,并评估患者的临床结局:该研究回顾性研究了头孢唑肟阿维菌素易感和头孢唑肟阿维菌素耐药肺炎克雷伯菌耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌感染患者的临床和微生物学数据,采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定风险因素、临床特征和结局:本研究共纳入了152例CRKP感染患者。对CAZ-AVI耐药的CRKP分离株患者(20/34 = 58.8%)曾接触过碳青霉烯类(p=0.003),且气管造口较多(16/34 = 47.1%)(p=0.001)。只有8/28(28.6%)名对CAZ-AVI敏感的CRKP分离株患者在服用头孢他啶-阿维菌素后死亡,而未服用头孢他啶-阿维菌素的患者为49/90(54.4%)(p=0.016)。1/9(11.1%)名对CAZ-AVI耐药的CRKP分离株患者在接受了秋水仙素治疗后死亡,而13/25(52%)名未接受秋水仙素治疗的患者死亡(P=0.03)。耐药CAZ-AVI的CRKP分离株的存在与总死亡率之间没有关联(几率比:0.7;95% CI:0.3,1.6),在耐药CAZ-AVI的CRKP分离株组中,没有发现总死亡率的独立风险预测因素:结论:CRE分离物中CAZ-AVI耐药性的早期出现凸显了常规CAZ-AVI耐药性实验室检测和抗菌药物管理计划的动态必要性,其重点是所有抗生素的使用。加强气管造口的医院感染控制可能有助于防止CRKP对CAZ产生耐药性。可乐定有助于降低CAZ-AVI CRKP分离株患者的死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrospective Tertiary Care-Based Cohort Study on Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections.

Introduction: The advent of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) isolates has been steadily documented in recent years. We aimed to identify risk factors of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP infection and assess clinical outcomes of patients.

Methods: The study retrospectively examined the clinical and microbiological data of patients with ceftazidime avibactam susceptible and ceftazidime avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae infection to identify risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: A total of 152 patients with CRKP infection were enrolled in this study. Patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates (20/34 = 58.8%) had prior exposure to carbapenems (p=0.003) and had more tracheostomies (16/34 = 47.1%) (p=0.001). Only 8/28 (28.6%) patients with CAZ-AVI susceptible CRKP isolates died amongst those administered ceftazidime-avibactam compared to 49/90 (54.4%) who did not receive the same (p=0.016). 1/9 (11.1%) patients with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates who received colistin died compared to 13/25 (52%) who did not receive colistin (p=0.03). There was no association between presence of CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates and overall mortality (odds ratio: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.3, 1.6), and no independent predictors of risk factors to overall mortality in the group with CAZ-AVI-resistant CRKP isolates were noted.

Conclusion: Early advent of CAZ-AVI resistance in CRE isolates highlights the dynamic necessity of routine CAZ-AVI resistance laboratory testing and antimicrobial stewardship programmes focusing on the utilization of all antibiotics. Consolidating the hospital infection control of tracheostomies may help to prevent CAZ resistance in CRKP. Colistin may aid in decreasing of mortality rates among patients with CAZ-AVI CRKP isolates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine. A Comparison of the Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a Low-Middle-Income Country. Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study: Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1