院前创伤登记系统中创伤性脑损伤的发生率。

Stephen F Braden, Brit J Long, Julie A Rizzo, Michael D April, Bradley A Dengler, Steven G Schauer
{"title":"院前创伤登记系统中创伤性脑损伤的发生率。","authors":"Stephen F Braden, Brit J Long, Julie A Rizzo, Michael D April, Bradley A Dengler, Steven G Schauer","doi":"10.55460/6RSJ-GXLF","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often underreported or undetected in prehospital civilian and military settings. This study evaluated the incidence of TBI within the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed PHTR and the linked Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) records of casualties from January 2003 through May 2019 for diagnostic data and surgical reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 709 casualties met inclusion criteria. The most common mechanism was blast, including 328 (51%) in the non-TBI and 45 (63%) in the TBI cohorts. The median injury severity scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 5 and 14, respectively. The survival scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 98% and 92%, respectively. Subdural hematomas, followed by subarachnoid hemorrhages were the most common classifiable brain injuries. Other nonspecific TBIs occurred in 85% of the TBI cohort casualties. Seventy-two cases (10%) were documented by the Role 1 clinician. Based on coding or operative data, 15 of the 72 (21%) were identified as TBIs. Of the 637 cases, which could not be decided based on coding or operative data, TBI was suspected in 42 (7%) cases based on Role 1 records.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 1 in 10 casualties presenting to a Role 1 facility had a TBI requiring transfer to a higher level of care. Our findings suggest the need for improved diagnostic technologies and documentation systems at Role 1 facilities for accurate TBI diagnosis and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injuries within the Prehospital Trauma Registry System.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen F Braden, Brit J Long, Julie A Rizzo, Michael D April, Bradley A Dengler, Steven G Schauer\",\"doi\":\"10.55460/6RSJ-GXLF\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often underreported or undetected in prehospital civilian and military settings. This study evaluated the incidence of TBI within the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed PHTR and the linked Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) records of casualties from January 2003 through May 2019 for diagnostic data and surgical reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 709 casualties met inclusion criteria. The most common mechanism was blast, including 328 (51%) in the non-TBI and 45 (63%) in the TBI cohorts. The median injury severity scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 5 and 14, respectively. The survival scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 98% and 92%, respectively. Subdural hematomas, followed by subarachnoid hemorrhages were the most common classifiable brain injuries. Other nonspecific TBIs occurred in 85% of the TBI cohort casualties. Seventy-two cases (10%) were documented by the Role 1 clinician. Based on coding or operative data, 15 of the 72 (21%) were identified as TBIs. Of the 637 cases, which could not be decided based on coding or operative data, TBI was suspected in 42 (7%) cases based on Role 1 records.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over 1 in 10 casualties presenting to a Role 1 facility had a TBI requiring transfer to a higher level of care. Our findings suggest the need for improved diagnostic technologies and documentation systems at Role 1 facilities for accurate TBI diagnosis and reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55460/6RSJ-GXLF\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/6RSJ-GXLF","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在院前民事和军事环境中,创伤性脑损伤(TBI)经常被低报或未被发现。本研究评估了院前创伤登记系统(PHTR)中创伤性脑损伤的发生率:方法:我们查阅了2003年1月至2019年5月期间PHTR和链接的国防部创伤登记处(DoDTR)的伤亡人员记录,以获取诊断数据和手术报告:共有 709 名伤员符合纳入标准。最常见的受伤机制是爆炸,其中非创伤性脑损伤有328人(51%),创伤性脑损伤有45人(63%)。非创伤性脑损伤组和创伤性脑损伤组的受伤严重程度中位数分别为 5 分和 14 分。非创伤性脑损伤组和创伤性脑损伤组的存活率分别为 98% 和 92%。硬膜下血肿是最常见的可分类脑损伤,其次是蛛网膜下腔出血。在创伤性脑损伤组群中,85%的伤员发生了其他非特异性创伤性脑损伤。角色 1 临床医生记录了 72 例(10%)。根据编码或手术数据,72 例中有 15 例(21%)被确定为创伤性脑损伤。在根据编码或手术数据无法确定的 637 个病例中,有 42 个病例(7%)根据角色 1 的记录被怀疑为创伤性脑损伤:结论:每 10 名到 "角色 1 "医疗机构就诊的伤员中就有 1 名以上患有创伤性脑损伤,需要转往更高级别的医疗机构。我们的研究结果表明,角色 1 机构需要改进诊断技术和文件系统,以准确诊断和报告创伤性脑损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence of Traumatic Brain Injuries within the Prehospital Trauma Registry System.

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often underreported or undetected in prehospital civilian and military settings. This study evaluated the incidence of TBI within the Prehospital Trauma Registry (PHTR) system.

Methods: We reviewed PHTR and the linked Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) records of casualties from January 2003 through May 2019 for diagnostic data and surgical reports.

Results: A total of 709 casualties met inclusion criteria. The most common mechanism was blast, including 328 (51%) in the non-TBI and 45 (63%) in the TBI cohorts. The median injury severity scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 5 and 14, respectively. The survival scores in the non-TBI and TBI cohorts were 98% and 92%, respectively. Subdural hematomas, followed by subarachnoid hemorrhages were the most common classifiable brain injuries. Other nonspecific TBIs occurred in 85% of the TBI cohort casualties. Seventy-two cases (10%) were documented by the Role 1 clinician. Based on coding or operative data, 15 of the 72 (21%) were identified as TBIs. Of the 637 cases, which could not be decided based on coding or operative data, TBI was suspected in 42 (7%) cases based on Role 1 records.

Conclusions: Over 1 in 10 casualties presenting to a Role 1 facility had a TBI requiring transfer to a higher level of care. Our findings suggest the need for improved diagnostic technologies and documentation systems at Role 1 facilities for accurate TBI diagnosis and reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Limitations of Triage in Military Mass Casualty Response: A Case Series. REBOA Use in a Medicalized Prehospital Setting Proposal for a First Protocol Based on the Delphi Method. Military Medical Student Specialty Preferences During the DHA Transition: A Retrospective Analysis. The Effect of Radiological Assessment of Volunteers for French Paratrooper Training A Five-Year Retrospective Study. Vascular Repair in Wartime Casualties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1