职业幸福感高的精神科医生和神经科医生的特征和习惯:混合方法研究

Alexis Amano MS , Nikitha K. Menon BS , Stephanie Bissonnette DO, MPH , Amy B. Sullivan PsyD, ABPP , Natasha Frost MS, MD, FAAN , Zariah Mekile MS, MAP , Hanhan Wang MPS , Tait D. Shanafelt MD, FACP , Mickey T. Trockel MD, PhD
{"title":"职业幸福感高的精神科医生和神经科医生的特征和习惯:混合方法研究","authors":"Alexis Amano MS ,&nbsp;Nikitha K. Menon BS ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bissonnette DO, MPH ,&nbsp;Amy B. Sullivan PsyD, ABPP ,&nbsp;Natasha Frost MS, MD, FAAN ,&nbsp;Zariah Mekile MS, MAP ,&nbsp;Hanhan Wang MPS ,&nbsp;Tait D. Shanafelt MD, FACP ,&nbsp;Mickey T. Trockel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify the characteristics that distinguish occupationally well outliers (OWO), a subset of academic psychiatrists and neurologists with consistently high professional fulfillment and low burnout, from their counterparts with lower levels of occupational well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><p>Participants included faculty physicians practicing psychiatry and neurology in academic medical centers affiliated with the Professional Well-being Academic Consortium. In this prospective, longitudinal study, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used. Quantitative measures were administered to physicians in a longitudinal occupational well-being survey sponsored by the academic organizations where they work. Four organizations participated in the qualitative study. Psychiatrists and neurologists at these organizations who competed survey measures at 2 consecutive time points between 2019 and 2021 were invited to participate in an interview.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 410 (213 psychiatrists and 197 neurologists) who completed professional fulfillment and burnout measures at 2 time points, 84 (20.5%) met OWO criteria. Occupationally well outliers psychiatrists and neurologists had more favorable scores on hypothesized determinants of well-being (values alignment, perceived gratitude, supportive leadership, peer support, and control of schedule). Ultimately, 31 psychiatrists (25% of 124 invited) and 33 neurologists (18.5% of 178 invited) agreed to participate in an interview. Qualitatively, OWO physicians differed from all others in 3 thematic domains: development of life grounded in priorities, ability to shape day-to-day work context, and professional relationships that provide joy and support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multilevel approach is necessary to promote optimal occupational well-being, targeting individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and broader system-level factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"8 4","pages":"Pages 329-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000286/pdfft?md5=4481e6580d24833b009cc1ef6d1cef55&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000286-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and Habits of Psychiatrists and Neurologists With High Occupational Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Amano MS ,&nbsp;Nikitha K. Menon BS ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bissonnette DO, MPH ,&nbsp;Amy B. Sullivan PsyD, ABPP ,&nbsp;Natasha Frost MS, MD, FAAN ,&nbsp;Zariah Mekile MS, MAP ,&nbsp;Hanhan Wang MPS ,&nbsp;Tait D. Shanafelt MD, FACP ,&nbsp;Mickey T. Trockel MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.04.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To identify the characteristics that distinguish occupationally well outliers (OWO), a subset of academic psychiatrists and neurologists with consistently high professional fulfillment and low burnout, from their counterparts with lower levels of occupational well-being.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><p>Participants included faculty physicians practicing psychiatry and neurology in academic medical centers affiliated with the Professional Well-being Academic Consortium. In this prospective, longitudinal study, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used. Quantitative measures were administered to physicians in a longitudinal occupational well-being survey sponsored by the academic organizations where they work. Four organizations participated in the qualitative study. Psychiatrists and neurologists at these organizations who competed survey measures at 2 consecutive time points between 2019 and 2021 were invited to participate in an interview.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 410 (213 psychiatrists and 197 neurologists) who completed professional fulfillment and burnout measures at 2 time points, 84 (20.5%) met OWO criteria. Occupationally well outliers psychiatrists and neurologists had more favorable scores on hypothesized determinants of well-being (values alignment, perceived gratitude, supportive leadership, peer support, and control of schedule). Ultimately, 31 psychiatrists (25% of 124 invited) and 33 neurologists (18.5% of 178 invited) agreed to participate in an interview. Qualitatively, OWO physicians differed from all others in 3 thematic domains: development of life grounded in priorities, ability to shape day-to-day work context, and professional relationships that provide joy and support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multilevel approach is necessary to promote optimal occupational well-being, targeting individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and broader system-level factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 329-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000286/pdfft?md5=4481e6580d24833b009cc1ef6d1cef55&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454824000286-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454824000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标确定职业健康离群者(OWO)与职业健康水平较低的同行之间的区别特征。参与者和方法参与者包括职业健康学术联盟(Professional Well-being Academic Consortium)下属学术医疗中心的精神科和神经科医生。在这项前瞻性纵向研究中,采用了定性和定量相结合的方法。在医生工作的学术组织发起的纵向职业幸福感调查中,对医生进行了定量测量。四家机构参与了定性研究。这些机构的精神科医生和神经科医生在2019年至2021年期间连续2个时间点参加了调查测量,并受邀参加了访谈。职业良好异常值的精神科医生和神经科医生在假设的幸福感决定因素(价值观一致、感知到的感激、支持性领导、同行支持和日程控制)方面得分较高。最终,31 名精神科医生(占 124 名受邀医生的 25%)和 33 名神经科医生(占 178 名受邀医生的 18.5%)同意参加访谈。从定性角度来看,职业幸福感医生在以下三个主题领域与其他所有医生有所不同:以优先事项为基础的生活发展、塑造日常工作环境的能力以及提供快乐和支持的职业关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics and Habits of Psychiatrists and Neurologists With High Occupational Well-Being: A Mixed Methods Study

Objective

To identify the characteristics that distinguish occupationally well outliers (OWO), a subset of academic psychiatrists and neurologists with consistently high professional fulfillment and low burnout, from their counterparts with lower levels of occupational well-being.

Participants and Methods

Participants included faculty physicians practicing psychiatry and neurology in academic medical centers affiliated with the Professional Well-being Academic Consortium. In this prospective, longitudinal study, a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach was used. Quantitative measures were administered to physicians in a longitudinal occupational well-being survey sponsored by the academic organizations where they work. Four organizations participated in the qualitative study. Psychiatrists and neurologists at these organizations who competed survey measures at 2 consecutive time points between 2019 and 2021 were invited to participate in an interview.

Results

Of 410 (213 psychiatrists and 197 neurologists) who completed professional fulfillment and burnout measures at 2 time points, 84 (20.5%) met OWO criteria. Occupationally well outliers psychiatrists and neurologists had more favorable scores on hypothesized determinants of well-being (values alignment, perceived gratitude, supportive leadership, peer support, and control of schedule). Ultimately, 31 psychiatrists (25% of 124 invited) and 33 neurologists (18.5% of 178 invited) agreed to participate in an interview. Qualitatively, OWO physicians differed from all others in 3 thematic domains: development of life grounded in priorities, ability to shape day-to-day work context, and professional relationships that provide joy and support.

Conclusion

A multilevel approach is necessary to promote optimal occupational well-being, targeting individual-level factors, organizational-level factors, and broader system-level factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Patient Perspectives and Demographic Factors Influencing Non-Participation in a Large Genomics Study Implementing an Evidence-Based Guideline to Improve Perioperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Quality Among Patients With Penicillin Allergy Labels Embedding Music in Care at Mayo Clinic Early Mobilization Outcomes With Tenecteplase Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke (EMOTE-TNK) Study: Safety and Tolerability Temporal Trends in Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Use Among Patients at Extremes of Body Weight: Insight From PINNACLE Registry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1