Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer
{"title":"瘢痕疙瘩特性对治疗效果的影响,系统性综述。","authors":"Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"913-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Vazula Bekkers, Paul Barsoum, Qi Yin, Frank Niessen, Paul van Zuijlen, Oren Lapid, Martijn van Doorn, Albert Wolkerstorfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"913-921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11424054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatologic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Keloid Properties on Treatment Efficacy: A Systematic Review.
Background: The efficacy of keloid treatment in randomized studies is highly variable. However, no systematic review has been performed to evaluate the effect of different keloid properties on treatment efficacy.
Objective: To identify clinically relevant keloid properties that may influence treatment efficacy.
Materials and methods: An electronic database search was conducted. Two reviewers independently selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and performed a methodologic quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool.
Results: One thousand five hundred twenty studies were screened, and 16 RCTs, involving 1,113 patients, were included. The authors found lower efficacy in older keloids ( n = 3), keloids located on the chest, extremities, pinna, and shoulder ( n = 3), larger keloids ( n = 2), lower baseline Vancouver Scar Scale score ( n = 1), and keloids with history of recurrence ( n = 1). Overall, most studies had a high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Only a minority of studies specifically addressed keloid properties, which makes comparisons between studies challenging. The authors' results suggest that keloid location, duration prior to treatment, size, history of recurrence, and severity are clinically relevant keloid properties that affect treatment efficacy. Further studies are crucial to corroborate the authors' findings, establish a clinically relevant keloid classification, and ultimately develop an evidence-based treatment algorithm that takes these properties into account.
期刊介绍:
Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including:
-Ambulatory phlebectomy-
Blepharoplasty-
Body contouring-
Chemical peels-
Cryosurgery-
Curettage and desiccation-
Dermabrasion-
Excision and closure-
Flap Surgery-
Grafting-
Hair restoration surgery-
Injectable neuromodulators-
Laser surgery-
Liposuction-
Microdermabrasion-
Microlipoinjection-
Micropigmentation-
Mohs micrographic surgery-
Nail surgery-
Phlebology-
Sclerotherapy-
Skin cancer surgery-
Skin resurfacing-
Soft-tissue fillers.
Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.