轻度脑外伤和骨科损伤儿童的心理复原力、认知储备和脑储备与撞击后症状的关系:A-CAP 研究。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurotrauma Pub Date : 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1089/neu.2024.0076
Safira Dharsee, Christianne Laliberté Durish, Ken Tang, Brian L Brooks, Melanie Noel, Ashley L Ware, Miriam H Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B Freedman, Bradley G Goodyear, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates
{"title":"轻度脑外伤和骨科损伤儿童的心理复原力、认知储备和脑储备与撞击后症状的关系:A-CAP 研究。","authors":"Safira Dharsee, Christianne Laliberté Durish, Ken Tang, Brian L Brooks, Melanie Noel, Ashley L Ware, Miriam H Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B Freedman, Bradley G Goodyear, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates","doi":"10.1089/neu.2024.0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protective factors, including psychological resilience, cognitive reserve, and brain reserve, may be positively associated with recovery after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but are yet to be studied concurrently. We sought to examine these factors as moderators of post-concussive symptoms (PCS) in pediatric mTBI compared with mild orthopedic injury (OI). Participants included 967 children (633 mTBI, 334 OI) aged 8-16.99 years, recruited from 5 Canadian pediatric emergency departments as part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. At 10 days post-injury, psychological resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and brain reserve was measured using total brain volume derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive reserve was measured at 3 months post-injury using IQ scores from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition. Cognitive and somatic PCS were measured using child and parent ratings on the Health and Behavior Inventory, completed weekly for 3 months and biweekly to 6 months. Analyses involved generalized least-squares regression models using restricted cubic splines. Covariates included age at injury, sex, racialized identity, material and social deprivation, pre-injury migraine and concussion history, and retrospective pre-injury PCS. Psychological resilience moderated group differences in parent-reported PCS. At 30 days post-injury, estimated group differences in parent-reported cognitive and somatic PCS (mTBI > OI) were larger at higher (75th percentile) resilience scores (<i>Est</i> = 2.25 [0.87, 3.64] and <i>Est</i> = 2.38 [1.76, 3.00], respectively) than at lower (25th percentile) resilience scores (<i>Est</i> = 1.44 [0.01, 2.86] and <i>Est</i> = 2.08 [1.45, 2.71], respectively). Resilience did not moderate group differences in child-reported PCS but was negatively associated with child-reported PCS in both groups (<i>p</i>s ≤ 0.001). Brain reserve (i.e., total brain volume [TBV]) also moderated group differences, but only for parent-reported somatic PCS (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Group difference (mTBI > OI) at 30 days was larger at smaller (25th percentile) TBV (<i>Est</i> = 2.78 [2.17, 3.38]) than at larger (75th percentile) TBV (<i>Est</i> = 1.95 [1.31, 2.59]). TBV was not associated with parent-reported cognitive PCS or child-reported PCS. IQ did not moderate PCS in either group but had a significant non-linear association in both groups with child-reported somatic PCS (<i>p</i> = 0.018) and parent-reported PCS (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with higher PCS scores at both lower and higher IQs. These findings suggest that higher resilience predicts fewer PCS, but less strongly after mTBI than OI; greater brain reserve may reduce the effect of mTBI on somatic PCS; and cognitive reserve has an unexpected curvilinear association with PCS across injury types. The results highlight the importance of protective factors as predictors of recovery and potential targets for intervention following pediatric mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Psychological Resilience, Cognitive Reserve, and Brain Reserve with Post-Concussive Symptoms in Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury: An A-CAP Study.\",\"authors\":\"Safira Dharsee, Christianne Laliberté Durish, Ken Tang, Brian L Brooks, Melanie Noel, Ashley L Ware, Miriam H Beauchamp, William Craig, Quynh Doan, Stephen B Freedman, Bradley G Goodyear, Jocelyn Gravel, Roger Zemek, Keith Owen Yeates\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/neu.2024.0076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protective factors, including psychological resilience, cognitive reserve, and brain reserve, may be positively associated with recovery after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but are yet to be studied concurrently. We sought to examine these factors as moderators of post-concussive symptoms (PCS) in pediatric mTBI compared with mild orthopedic injury (OI). Participants included 967 children (633 mTBI, 334 OI) aged 8-16.99 years, recruited from 5 Canadian pediatric emergency departments as part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. At 10 days post-injury, psychological resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and brain reserve was measured using total brain volume derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive reserve was measured at 3 months post-injury using IQ scores from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition. Cognitive and somatic PCS were measured using child and parent ratings on the Health and Behavior Inventory, completed weekly for 3 months and biweekly to 6 months. Analyses involved generalized least-squares regression models using restricted cubic splines. Covariates included age at injury, sex, racialized identity, material and social deprivation, pre-injury migraine and concussion history, and retrospective pre-injury PCS. Psychological resilience moderated group differences in parent-reported PCS. At 30 days post-injury, estimated group differences in parent-reported cognitive and somatic PCS (mTBI > OI) were larger at higher (75th percentile) resilience scores (<i>Est</i> = 2.25 [0.87, 3.64] and <i>Est</i> = 2.38 [1.76, 3.00], respectively) than at lower (25th percentile) resilience scores (<i>Est</i> = 1.44 [0.01, 2.86] and <i>Est</i> = 2.08 [1.45, 2.71], respectively). Resilience did not moderate group differences in child-reported PCS but was negatively associated with child-reported PCS in both groups (<i>p</i>s ≤ 0.001). Brain reserve (i.e., total brain volume [TBV]) also moderated group differences, but only for parent-reported somatic PCS (<i>p</i> = 0.018). Group difference (mTBI > OI) at 30 days was larger at smaller (25th percentile) TBV (<i>Est</i> = 2.78 [2.17, 3.38]) than at larger (75th percentile) TBV (<i>Est</i> = 1.95 [1.31, 2.59]). TBV was not associated with parent-reported cognitive PCS or child-reported PCS. IQ did not moderate PCS in either group but had a significant non-linear association in both groups with child-reported somatic PCS (<i>p</i> = 0.018) and parent-reported PCS (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with higher PCS scores at both lower and higher IQs. These findings suggest that higher resilience predicts fewer PCS, but less strongly after mTBI than OI; greater brain reserve may reduce the effect of mTBI on somatic PCS; and cognitive reserve has an unexpected curvilinear association with PCS across injury types. The results highlight the importance of protective factors as predictors of recovery and potential targets for intervention following pediatric mTBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0076\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2024.0076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

包括心理复原力、认知储备和大脑储备在内的保护性因素可能与小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后的恢复有积极的关联,但尚未同时进行研究。与轻度骨科损伤(OI)相比,我们试图研究这些因素对小儿轻度创伤性脑损伤后症状(PCS)的调节作用。作为一项前瞻性纵向队列研究的一部分,我们从加拿大 5 个儿科急诊部门招募了 967 名 8-16.99 岁的儿童(633 名 mTBI,334 名 OI)作为研究对象。在受伤后10天,使用康纳-戴维森复原力量表(CD-RISC)测量心理复原力,使用结构性磁共振成像得出的脑总体积(TBV)测量脑储备。认知储备是在伤后 3 个月使用韦氏智力缩略量表第二版的智商分数进行测量的。认知和躯体 PCS 采用儿童和家长对健康和行为量表的评分进行测量,3 个月内每周完成一次,6 个月内每两周完成一次。分析涉及使用限制性三次样条的广义最小二乘法回归模型。协变量包括受伤时的年龄、性别、种族身份、物质和社会剥夺、受伤前偏头痛和脑震荡病史以及受伤前 PCS 回顾。心理复原力调节了家长报告的 PCS 群体差异。在受伤后 30 天,家长报告的认知和躯体 PCS(mTBI > OI)的估计组间差异在复原力分数较高(第 75 百分位数)时(Est = 2.25 [0.87, 3.64] 和 Est = 2.38 [1.76, 3.00])大于复原力分数较低(第 25 百分位数)时(Est = 1.44 [0.01, 2.86] 和 Est = 2.08 [1.45, 2.71])。复原力并没有缓和儿童报告的 PCS 的组间差异,但在两个组中都与儿童报告的 PCS 负相关(PS < .001)。脑储备(即 TBV)也能缓和组间差异,但仅限于家长报告的躯体 PCS(P = .018)。30 天时,TBV 较小(第 25 百分位数)时的组间差异(mTBI > OI)(Est = 2.78 [2.17, 3.38])大于 TBV 较大(第 75 百分位数)时的组间差异(Est = 1.95 [1.31, 2.59])。TBV 与家长报告的认知 PCS 或儿童报告的 PCS 无关。智商对两组儿童的 PCS 均无调节作用,但与儿童报告的躯体 PCS(p = .018)和家长报告的 PCS(p < .001)有显著的非线性关系,智商越低和越高,PCS 分数越高。这些研究结果表明,较高的恢复力可预测较少的PCS,但与OI相比,mTBI后的恢复力较弱;较强的大脑储备可减少mTBI对躯体PCS的影响;认知储备与不同损伤类型的PCS有着意想不到的曲线关系。研究结果强调了保护性因素作为儿科 mTBI 后康复预测因素和潜在干预目标的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Psychological Resilience, Cognitive Reserve, and Brain Reserve with Post-Concussive Symptoms in Children with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Injury: An A-CAP Study.

Protective factors, including psychological resilience, cognitive reserve, and brain reserve, may be positively associated with recovery after pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) but are yet to be studied concurrently. We sought to examine these factors as moderators of post-concussive symptoms (PCS) in pediatric mTBI compared with mild orthopedic injury (OI). Participants included 967 children (633 mTBI, 334 OI) aged 8-16.99 years, recruited from 5 Canadian pediatric emergency departments as part of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. At 10 days post-injury, psychological resilience was measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and brain reserve was measured using total brain volume derived from structural magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive reserve was measured at 3 months post-injury using IQ scores from the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-Second Edition. Cognitive and somatic PCS were measured using child and parent ratings on the Health and Behavior Inventory, completed weekly for 3 months and biweekly to 6 months. Analyses involved generalized least-squares regression models using restricted cubic splines. Covariates included age at injury, sex, racialized identity, material and social deprivation, pre-injury migraine and concussion history, and retrospective pre-injury PCS. Psychological resilience moderated group differences in parent-reported PCS. At 30 days post-injury, estimated group differences in parent-reported cognitive and somatic PCS (mTBI > OI) were larger at higher (75th percentile) resilience scores (Est = 2.25 [0.87, 3.64] and Est = 2.38 [1.76, 3.00], respectively) than at lower (25th percentile) resilience scores (Est = 1.44 [0.01, 2.86] and Est = 2.08 [1.45, 2.71], respectively). Resilience did not moderate group differences in child-reported PCS but was negatively associated with child-reported PCS in both groups (ps ≤ 0.001). Brain reserve (i.e., total brain volume [TBV]) also moderated group differences, but only for parent-reported somatic PCS (p = 0.018). Group difference (mTBI > OI) at 30 days was larger at smaller (25th percentile) TBV (Est = 2.78 [2.17, 3.38]) than at larger (75th percentile) TBV (Est = 1.95 [1.31, 2.59]). TBV was not associated with parent-reported cognitive PCS or child-reported PCS. IQ did not moderate PCS in either group but had a significant non-linear association in both groups with child-reported somatic PCS (p = 0.018) and parent-reported PCS (p < 0.001), with higher PCS scores at both lower and higher IQs. These findings suggest that higher resilience predicts fewer PCS, but less strongly after mTBI than OI; greater brain reserve may reduce the effect of mTBI on somatic PCS; and cognitive reserve has an unexpected curvilinear association with PCS across injury types. The results highlight the importance of protective factors as predictors of recovery and potential targets for intervention following pediatric mTBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury. Altered Dynamic Brain Functional Network Connectivity Related to Visual Network in Spinal Cord Injury. Genetic Differences Modify Anesthetic Preconditioning of Traumatic Brain Injury in Drosophila. Measuring Self-Efficacy for Concussion Recovery: Psychometric Characteristics of the Progressive Activities of Controlled Exertion-Self-Efficacy Scale. Correction to: Impact of Low-Level Blast Exposure on Brain Function after a One-Day Tactile Training and the Ameliorating Effect of a Jugular Vein Compression Neck Collar Device; DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5737.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1