连接点:用超图分析和直观展示前提和结论对论证有效性的共同作用

IF 1.1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1007/s11098-024-02141-7
Peter Verdée, Pierre Saint-Germier, Pilar Terrés Villalonga
{"title":"连接点:用超图分析和直观展示前提和结论对论证有效性的共同作用","authors":"Peter Verdée, Pierre Saint-Germier, Pilar Terrés Villalonga","doi":"10.1007/s11098-024-02141-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A detailed analysis of joint-contribution of premises and conclusions in classically valid sequents is presented in terms of hypergraphs. In (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., &amp; Villalonga, P. T. (2024). <i>Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies</i> (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1), this idea of joint-contribution is introduced and motivated as a method for characterizing four kinds of relevant validity, in the sense of selecting the relevantly valid sequents among the classically valid sequents. The account in (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., &amp; Villalonga, P. T. (2024). <i>Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies</i> (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1) is built on a calculus, called <span>\\(\\textsf{GLK}^{\\hbox {a}}\\)</span>, which proves grounding claims for (enthymematically) valid sequents. In the present paper an adequate representation of <span>\\(\\textsf{GLK}^{\\hbox {a}}\\)</span> is given in terms of hypergraphs. The hypergraphs are a kind of diagrammatic proofs for Classical Propositional Logic, entirely based on the grounds of premises and conclusions. The hypergraphs and their visualization provide insights into the relations between premises and conclusions and into the way validity is produced by the binding of premises and conclusions via their partial grounds. They visualize the network of elements of the sequent that contribute to its logical validity. Non-contributing (i.e. irrelevant) premises and conclusions are then specified to be those that are disconnected from the network, however one constructs the graphs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48305,"journal":{"name":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Connecting the dots: hypergraphs to analyze and visualize the joint-contribution of premises and conclusions to the validity of arguments\",\"authors\":\"Peter Verdée, Pierre Saint-Germier, Pilar Terrés Villalonga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11098-024-02141-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A detailed analysis of joint-contribution of premises and conclusions in classically valid sequents is presented in terms of hypergraphs. In (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., &amp; Villalonga, P. T. (2024). <i>Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies</i> (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1), this idea of joint-contribution is introduced and motivated as a method for characterizing four kinds of relevant validity, in the sense of selecting the relevantly valid sequents among the classically valid sequents. The account in (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., &amp; Villalonga, P. T. (2024). <i>Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies</i> (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1) is built on a calculus, called <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{GLK}^{\\\\hbox {a}}\\\\)</span>, which proves grounding claims for (enthymematically) valid sequents. In the present paper an adequate representation of <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{GLK}^{\\\\hbox {a}}\\\\)</span> is given in terms of hypergraphs. The hypergraphs are a kind of diagrammatic proofs for Classical Propositional Logic, entirely based on the grounds of premises and conclusions. The hypergraphs and their visualization provide insights into the relations between premises and conclusions and into the way validity is produced by the binding of premises and conclusions via their partial grounds. They visualize the network of elements of the sequent that contribute to its logical validity. Non-contributing (i.e. irrelevant) premises and conclusions are then specified to be those that are disconnected from the network, however one constructs the graphs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02141-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02141-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用超图对经典有效序列中前提和结论的联合贡献进行了详细分析。见(Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., & Villalonga, P. T. (2024)。相关蕴涵与逻辑基础。哲学研究》(pp. 1-43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1)引入了联合贡献这一概念,并将其作为描述四种相关有效性的方法,即在经典有效的序列中选择相关有效的序列。圣-热尔米耶,P.,韦尔代,P. & 维拉隆加,P. T. (2024).Relevant entailment and logical ground.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1)是建立在一个叫做 (\textsf{GLK}^{\hbox {a}}\)的微积分之上的,这个微积分证明了(enthymematically)有效sequents的基础主张。本文用超图给出了 \textsf{GLK}^{hbox {a}}\ 的适当表示。超图是古典命题逻辑的一种图解证明,完全建立在前提和结论的基础之上。超图及其可视化让我们深入了解前提和结论之间的关系,以及通过部分依据将前提和结论结合起来产生有效性的方式。它们形象地展示了序列中有助于其逻辑有效性的元素网络。无论如何构建图形,无贡献(即不相关)的前提和结论都将被指定为与网络断开连接的前提和结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Connecting the dots: hypergraphs to analyze and visualize the joint-contribution of premises and conclusions to the validity of arguments

A detailed analysis of joint-contribution of premises and conclusions in classically valid sequents is presented in terms of hypergraphs. In (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., & Villalonga, P. T. (2024). Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1), this idea of joint-contribution is introduced and motivated as a method for characterizing four kinds of relevant validity, in the sense of selecting the relevantly valid sequents among the classically valid sequents. The account in (Saint-Germier, P., Verdée, P., & Villalonga, P. T. (2024). Relevant entailment and logical ground. Philosophical Studies (pp. 1–43). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02101-1) is built on a calculus, called \(\textsf{GLK}^{\hbox {a}}\), which proves grounding claims for (enthymematically) valid sequents. In the present paper an adequate representation of \(\textsf{GLK}^{\hbox {a}}\) is given in terms of hypergraphs. The hypergraphs are a kind of diagrammatic proofs for Classical Propositional Logic, entirely based on the grounds of premises and conclusions. The hypergraphs and their visualization provide insights into the relations between premises and conclusions and into the way validity is produced by the binding of premises and conclusions via their partial grounds. They visualize the network of elements of the sequent that contribute to its logical validity. Non-contributing (i.e. irrelevant) premises and conclusions are then specified to be those that are disconnected from the network, however one constructs the graphs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Philosophical Studies was founded in 1950 by Herbert Feigl and Wilfrid Sellars to provide a periodical dedicated to work in analytic philosophy. The journal remains devoted to the publication of papers in exclusively analytic philosophy. Papers applying formal techniques to philosophical problems are welcome. The principal aim is to publish articles that are models of clarity and precision in dealing with significant philosophical issues. It is intended that readers of the journal will be kept abreast of the central issues and problems of contemporary analytic philosophy. Double-blind review procedure The journal follows a double-blind reviewing procedure. Authors are therefore requested to place their name and affiliation on a separate page. Self-identifying citations and references in the article text should either be avoided or left blank when manuscripts are first submitted. Authors are responsible for reinserting self-identifying citations and references when manuscripts are prepared for final submission.
期刊最新文献
Incommensurability and democratic deliberation in bioethics What Is Rational Sentimentalism? Metaphor and ambiguity Beyond Preferences in AI Alignment What is reasonable doubt? For philosophical studies special issue on Sosa’s ‘epistemic explanations’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1