探究尺寸和非尺寸参数对间距不同的交错排列的窝状太阳能空气加热器性能的影响

IF 6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Solar Energy Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2024.112663
Sudharani Panda, Rakesh Kumar
{"title":"探究尺寸和非尺寸参数对间距不同的交错排列的窝状太阳能空气加热器性能的影响","authors":"Sudharani Panda,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar","doi":"10.1016/j.solener.2024.112663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, the efficacy of a single pass, single glazed, five different types of absorber plate incorporated solar air heater (SAH) was experimentally examined in outdoor test conditions on alternative days. The experiment was carried out for flat plate solar air heater (FPSAH) and staggered arranged dimple imprinted absorber plate solar air heater (SDPSAH) maintained at four different pitch ratios (<em>P</em><sub>t</sub>/<em>P</em><sub>l</sub>: 1.0, 1.11, 1.25, and 1.67) by varying the air mass flow rate (<em>m</em><sub>a</sub>) from 0.01-0.05 kg/s (corresponding <em>Re</em> range: 1971.66–10466.45). The results show that the performance of both FPSAH and SDPSAH improves when the <em>m</em><sub>a</sub> increases. For the tested range of <em>m</em><sub>a</sub>, SDPSAH outperforms FPSAH regardless of pitch ratio. SDPSAH, with a pitch ratio of 1.25, on the other hand, has a greater air temperature difference, efficiencies, heat removal factor, collector efficiencies, and averaged Nusselt number (<em>Nu</em><sub>avg</sub>) while having a lower global heat loss coefficient and top loss. The <em>Nu</em><sub>avg</sub> of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 is 1.01–1.17, 1.16–1.24, 1.26–1.57, and 1.44–1.88 times higher than SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.0, 1.11, 1.67, and FPSAH, respectively. The higher averaged friction factor (<em>f</em><sub>avg</sub>) of 0.0443 is attained for SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 due to the presence of the largest number of dimples. The <em>η</em><sub>th</sub> and <em>η</em><sub>d</sub> of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 are 34.5 and 35.5 % higher than those of FPSAH. The global heat loss coefficient of SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.11, 1.0, and 1.67 is 1.05–1.84, 1.09–2.15, and 1.11–2.92 times higher, respectively, than that of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":428,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the effect of dimensional and non-dimensional parameters on the performance of pitch-varied staggered arranged dimple solar air heaters\",\"authors\":\"Sudharani Panda,&nbsp;Rakesh Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.solener.2024.112663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, the efficacy of a single pass, single glazed, five different types of absorber plate incorporated solar air heater (SAH) was experimentally examined in outdoor test conditions on alternative days. The experiment was carried out for flat plate solar air heater (FPSAH) and staggered arranged dimple imprinted absorber plate solar air heater (SDPSAH) maintained at four different pitch ratios (<em>P</em><sub>t</sub>/<em>P</em><sub>l</sub>: 1.0, 1.11, 1.25, and 1.67) by varying the air mass flow rate (<em>m</em><sub>a</sub>) from 0.01-0.05 kg/s (corresponding <em>Re</em> range: 1971.66–10466.45). The results show that the performance of both FPSAH and SDPSAH improves when the <em>m</em><sub>a</sub> increases. For the tested range of <em>m</em><sub>a</sub>, SDPSAH outperforms FPSAH regardless of pitch ratio. SDPSAH, with a pitch ratio of 1.25, on the other hand, has a greater air temperature difference, efficiencies, heat removal factor, collector efficiencies, and averaged Nusselt number (<em>Nu</em><sub>avg</sub>) while having a lower global heat loss coefficient and top loss. The <em>Nu</em><sub>avg</sub> of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 is 1.01–1.17, 1.16–1.24, 1.26–1.57, and 1.44–1.88 times higher than SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.0, 1.11, 1.67, and FPSAH, respectively. The higher averaged friction factor (<em>f</em><sub>avg</sub>) of 0.0443 is attained for SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 due to the presence of the largest number of dimples. The <em>η</em><sub>th</sub> and <em>η</em><sub>d</sub> of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 are 34.5 and 35.5 % higher than those of FPSAH. The global heat loss coefficient of SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.11, 1.0, and 1.67 is 1.05–1.84, 1.09–2.15, and 1.11–2.92 times higher, respectively, than that of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X2400358X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X2400358X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们在室外测试条件下对单通道、单层玻璃、五种不同类型的吸收板太阳能空气加热器(SAH)的功效进行了实验研究。实验针对平板式太阳能空气加热器(FPSAH)和交错排列的凹陷印记吸收板式太阳能空气加热器(SDPSAH)进行,保持四种不同的间距比(Pt/Pl:1.0、1.11、1.25 和 1.67),空气质量流量(ma)在 0.01-0.05 kg/s 之间变化(相应的 Re 范围:1971.66-10466.45)。结果表明,当 ma 增加时,FPSAH 和 SDPSAH 的性能都有所改善。在测试的 ma 范围内,无论螺距比如何,SDPSAH 的性能都优于 FPSAH。另一方面,间距比为 1.25 的 SDPSAH 具有更大的空气温差、效率、散热系数、集热器效率和平均努塞尔特数(Nuavg),同时具有更低的全局热损失系数和顶部损失。间距比为 1.25 的 SDPSAH 的 Nuavg 分别是间距比为 1.0、1.11、1.67 和 FPSAH 的 SDPSAH 的 1.01-1.17、1.16-1.24、1.26-1.57 和 1.44-1.88 倍。由于存在最多的凹痕,SDPSAH 在间距比为 1.25 时的平均摩擦因数(favg)为 0.0443。间距比为 1.25 时,SDPSAH 的 ηth 和 ηd 分别比 FPSAH 高 34.5% 和 35.5%。间距比为 1.11、1.0 和 1.67 时,SDPSAH 的总体热损失系数分别是间距比为 1.25 时 SDPSAH 的 1.05-1.84 倍、1.09-2.15 倍和 1.11-2.92 倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of the effect of dimensional and non-dimensional parameters on the performance of pitch-varied staggered arranged dimple solar air heaters

In this study, the efficacy of a single pass, single glazed, five different types of absorber plate incorporated solar air heater (SAH) was experimentally examined in outdoor test conditions on alternative days. The experiment was carried out for flat plate solar air heater (FPSAH) and staggered arranged dimple imprinted absorber plate solar air heater (SDPSAH) maintained at four different pitch ratios (Pt/Pl: 1.0, 1.11, 1.25, and 1.67) by varying the air mass flow rate (ma) from 0.01-0.05 kg/s (corresponding Re range: 1971.66–10466.45). The results show that the performance of both FPSAH and SDPSAH improves when the ma increases. For the tested range of ma, SDPSAH outperforms FPSAH regardless of pitch ratio. SDPSAH, with a pitch ratio of 1.25, on the other hand, has a greater air temperature difference, efficiencies, heat removal factor, collector efficiencies, and averaged Nusselt number (Nuavg) while having a lower global heat loss coefficient and top loss. The Nuavg of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 is 1.01–1.17, 1.16–1.24, 1.26–1.57, and 1.44–1.88 times higher than SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.0, 1.11, 1.67, and FPSAH, respectively. The higher averaged friction factor (favg) of 0.0443 is attained for SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 due to the presence of the largest number of dimples. The ηth and ηd of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25 are 34.5 and 35.5 % higher than those of FPSAH. The global heat loss coefficient of SDPSAH at pitch ratios 1.11, 1.0, and 1.67 is 1.05–1.84, 1.09–2.15, and 1.11–2.92 times higher, respectively, than that of SDPSAH at a pitch ratio of 1.25.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Solar Energy
Solar Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
9.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Solar Energy welcomes manuscripts presenting information not previously published in journals on any aspect of solar energy research, development, application, measurement or policy. The term "solar energy" in this context includes the indirect uses such as wind energy and biomass
期刊最新文献
Experimental study of the solar chimney effect in naturally ventilated BIPV cladding system under real operating condition Exploring the influence of switching frequency on the stability in a weak grid: A comprehensive analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic systems Experimental study and simulation of Hybrid-Active solar thermal cylindrical chamber for Citrus Hystrix leaves drying High-efficiency 3D solar evaporators with the PSAVF strategy for achieving excellent salt resistance Design of multi-objective optimized dynamic photovoltaic shades and thin films
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1