再论部分模糊关系方程系统的可解性--简述

IF 3.2 1区 数学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Fuzzy Sets and Systems Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.fss.2024.109035
Nhung Cao, Martin Štěpnička
{"title":"再论部分模糊关系方程系统的可解性--简述","authors":"Nhung Cao,&nbsp;Martin Štěpnička","doi":"10.1016/j.fss.2024.109035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fuzzy inference systems have been widely investigated from different perspectives, including their logical correctness. It is not surprising that the logical correctness led mostly to the questions on the preservation of modus ponens. Indeed, whenever such a system processes an input equivalent to one of the rule antecedents, it is natural to expect the modus ponens to be preserved and the inferred output to be identical to the respective rule consequent. This leads to the related systems of fuzzy relational equations where the antecedent and consequent fuzzy sets are known values, the inference is represented either by the direct product related to the compositional rule of inference or by the Bandler-Kohout subproduct, and the fuzzy relation that represents the fuzzy rule base is the unknown element in the equations. The most important question is whether such systems are solvable, i.e., whether there even exists a fuzzy relation that models the given fuzzy rule base in such a way that the modus ponens is preserved.</p><p>Partiality allows dealing with partially defined truth values which allows to deal with situations, where we cannot define the truth value for a given predicate. The partial logics have been recently extended to partial fuzzy logics and the partial fuzzy set theory has been developed. Partial fuzzy sets then may have undefined membership degrees for some values from the given universe.</p><p>This background leads naturally to the problem of solvability of partial fuzzy relational equations, which are equations with partial fuzzy sets in the role of antecedents and consequents and with partial fuzzy relation as the model of the given fuzzy rule base. Such a setting led to a recent publication that uncovers the solvability and even the shape of the solutions. In this contribution, we revisit the problem and consider a specific case that allows partiality only in the input. In other words, antecedents, as well as consequents expressing the knowledge, are fully defined. Thus, the model of the fuzzy rules is one of the standard and fully defined relations. We investigate what happens if the input differs from one of the antecedents only by a few undefined values. This mimics the situation when a description of an observed object misses a few values in its feature vector. We show that under specific conditions, we still may preserve the modified modus ponens, i.e., that the inferred output is identical with the fully defined consequent of the respective rule.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55130,"journal":{"name":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","volume":"490 ","pages":"Article 109035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solvability of systems of partial fuzzy relational equations revisited – a short note\",\"authors\":\"Nhung Cao,&nbsp;Martin Štěpnička\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fss.2024.109035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fuzzy inference systems have been widely investigated from different perspectives, including their logical correctness. It is not surprising that the logical correctness led mostly to the questions on the preservation of modus ponens. Indeed, whenever such a system processes an input equivalent to one of the rule antecedents, it is natural to expect the modus ponens to be preserved and the inferred output to be identical to the respective rule consequent. This leads to the related systems of fuzzy relational equations where the antecedent and consequent fuzzy sets are known values, the inference is represented either by the direct product related to the compositional rule of inference or by the Bandler-Kohout subproduct, and the fuzzy relation that represents the fuzzy rule base is the unknown element in the equations. The most important question is whether such systems are solvable, i.e., whether there even exists a fuzzy relation that models the given fuzzy rule base in such a way that the modus ponens is preserved.</p><p>Partiality allows dealing with partially defined truth values which allows to deal with situations, where we cannot define the truth value for a given predicate. The partial logics have been recently extended to partial fuzzy logics and the partial fuzzy set theory has been developed. Partial fuzzy sets then may have undefined membership degrees for some values from the given universe.</p><p>This background leads naturally to the problem of solvability of partial fuzzy relational equations, which are equations with partial fuzzy sets in the role of antecedents and consequents and with partial fuzzy relation as the model of the given fuzzy rule base. Such a setting led to a recent publication that uncovers the solvability and even the shape of the solutions. In this contribution, we revisit the problem and consider a specific case that allows partiality only in the input. In other words, antecedents, as well as consequents expressing the knowledge, are fully defined. Thus, the model of the fuzzy rules is one of the standard and fully defined relations. We investigate what happens if the input differs from one of the antecedents only by a few undefined values. This mimics the situation when a description of an observed object misses a few values in its feature vector. We show that under specific conditions, we still may preserve the modified modus ponens, i.e., that the inferred output is identical with the fully defined consequent of the respective rule.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuzzy Sets and Systems\",\"volume\":\"490 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuzzy Sets and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011424001817\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuzzy Sets and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011424001817","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们从不同的角度对模糊推理系统进行了广泛的研究,包括其逻辑正确性。逻辑正确性问题主要涉及模态的保持,这并不奇怪。事实上,每当这样的系统处理与规则前因之一等价的输入时,自然会期望模态得到保留,推断输出与相应的规则后因相同。这就产生了相关的模糊关系方程系统,其中前因和后果模糊集合是已知值,推理由与推理组成规则相关的直接乘积或班德勒-科胡特子乘积表示,而表示模糊规则基础的模糊关系是方程中的未知元素。最重要的问题是这种系统是否可解,即是否存在一种模糊关系,它能以保留模态的方式模拟给定的模糊规则库。偏逻辑允许处理部分定义的真值,从而可以处理我们无法定义给定谓词真值的情况。部分逻辑最近被扩展为部分模糊逻辑,并发展出部分模糊集理论。这种背景自然而然地引出了部分模糊关系式的可解性问题,即以部分模糊集作为前因后果,以部分模糊关系作为给定模糊规则基础模型的方程。在这样的背景下,最近发表的一篇论文揭示了方程的可解性,甚至是解的形状。在这篇论文中,我们重新审视了这个问题,并考虑了一种只允许输入部分性的特殊情况。换句话说,表达知识的前因后果是完全确定的。因此,模糊规则的模型是一种标准的、完全定义的关系。我们要研究的是,如果输入与其中一个前因只相差几个未定义的值,会发生什么情况。这模拟了对观察对象的描述在其特征向量中遗漏了几个值的情况。我们证明,在特定条件下,我们仍然可以保留修改后的模态,即推断输出与相应规则的完全定义结果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Solvability of systems of partial fuzzy relational equations revisited – a short note

Fuzzy inference systems have been widely investigated from different perspectives, including their logical correctness. It is not surprising that the logical correctness led mostly to the questions on the preservation of modus ponens. Indeed, whenever such a system processes an input equivalent to one of the rule antecedents, it is natural to expect the modus ponens to be preserved and the inferred output to be identical to the respective rule consequent. This leads to the related systems of fuzzy relational equations where the antecedent and consequent fuzzy sets are known values, the inference is represented either by the direct product related to the compositional rule of inference or by the Bandler-Kohout subproduct, and the fuzzy relation that represents the fuzzy rule base is the unknown element in the equations. The most important question is whether such systems are solvable, i.e., whether there even exists a fuzzy relation that models the given fuzzy rule base in such a way that the modus ponens is preserved.

Partiality allows dealing with partially defined truth values which allows to deal with situations, where we cannot define the truth value for a given predicate. The partial logics have been recently extended to partial fuzzy logics and the partial fuzzy set theory has been developed. Partial fuzzy sets then may have undefined membership degrees for some values from the given universe.

This background leads naturally to the problem of solvability of partial fuzzy relational equations, which are equations with partial fuzzy sets in the role of antecedents and consequents and with partial fuzzy relation as the model of the given fuzzy rule base. Such a setting led to a recent publication that uncovers the solvability and even the shape of the solutions. In this contribution, we revisit the problem and consider a specific case that allows partiality only in the input. In other words, antecedents, as well as consequents expressing the knowledge, are fully defined. Thus, the model of the fuzzy rules is one of the standard and fully defined relations. We investigate what happens if the input differs from one of the antecedents only by a few undefined values. This mimics the situation when a description of an observed object misses a few values in its feature vector. We show that under specific conditions, we still may preserve the modified modus ponens, i.e., that the inferred output is identical with the fully defined consequent of the respective rule.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fuzzy Sets and Systems
Fuzzy Sets and Systems 数学-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
17.90%
发文量
321
审稿时长
6.1 months
期刊介绍: Since its launching in 1978, the journal Fuzzy Sets and Systems has been devoted to the international advancement of the theory and application of fuzzy sets and systems. The theory of fuzzy sets now encompasses a well organized corpus of basic notions including (and not restricted to) aggregation operations, a generalized theory of relations, specific measures of information content, a calculus of fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy sets are also the cornerstone of a non-additive uncertainty theory, namely possibility theory, and of a versatile tool for both linguistic and numerical modeling: fuzzy rule-based systems. Numerous works now combine fuzzy concepts with other scientific disciplines as well as modern technologies. In mathematics fuzzy sets have triggered new research topics in connection with category theory, topology, algebra, analysis. Fuzzy sets are also part of a recent trend in the study of generalized measures and integrals, and are combined with statistical methods. Furthermore, fuzzy sets have strong logical underpinnings in the tradition of many-valued logics.
期刊最新文献
Average general fractal dimensions of typical compact metric spaces A note on the cross-migrativity between uninorms and overlap (grouping) functions Combining thresholded real values for designing an artificial neuron in a neural network Nonfragile anti-transitional-asynchrony fault tolerant control for IT2 fuzzy semi-Markov jump systems with actuator failures Learning-enabled event-triggered fuzzy adaptive control of multiagent systems with prescribed performance: A chaos-based privacy-preserving method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1