Gary Schwartz , Jennifer H. Lin , Swapnabir Kakoty
{"title":"对接受结直肠切除术的患者阿片类药物纵向使用情况和医疗资源利用情况的真实世界评估","authors":"Gary Schwartz , Jennifer H. Lin , Swapnabir Kakoty","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been used in multimodal pain management regimens to improve postsurgical analgesia. This retrospective cohort analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes of LB vs non-LB analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery using real-world patient data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases. Patients who received LB were 1:1 matched to patients who did not receive LB (non-LB) via propensity scores. Outcomes included opioid use during the perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge), continued (>2 weeks to 3 months after discharge), and persistent (>3 months to 6 months after discharge) periods and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the first 3 months after discharge. Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB (<em>n</em> = 4397) versus non-LB (n = 4397) cohort perioperatively (483 vs 538 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; <em>P</em> = 0.001) and after discharge within ∼3 months (222 vs 328 MMEs; <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and 3–6 months (245 vs 384 MMEs; <em>P</em> < 0.0001). The LB cohort had shorter mean length of stay (5.2 vs 5.7 days; <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and fewer inpatient readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; <em>P</em> < 0.0001), emergency department visits (OR, 0.78; <em>P</em> < 0.0001), and outpatient/office visits (OR, 0.91; <em>P</em> = 0.028) than the non-LB cohort 3 months after discharge. These data suggest use of LB in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery may reduce perioperative and postdischarge opioid use as well as HRU. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, this analysis provides valuable real-world data from large claims databases to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes that complement other types of retrospective and prospective studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 94-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000794/pdfft?md5=196ad89e9c104e6dec290b138248a975&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000794-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world assessment of longitudinal opioid use and healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing colorectal resection\",\"authors\":\"Gary Schwartz , Jennifer H. Lin , Swapnabir Kakoty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been used in multimodal pain management regimens to improve postsurgical analgesia. This retrospective cohort analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes of LB vs non-LB analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery using real-world patient data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases. Patients who received LB were 1:1 matched to patients who did not receive LB (non-LB) via propensity scores. Outcomes included opioid use during the perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge), continued (>2 weeks to 3 months after discharge), and persistent (>3 months to 6 months after discharge) periods and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the first 3 months after discharge. Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB (<em>n</em> = 4397) versus non-LB (n = 4397) cohort perioperatively (483 vs 538 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; <em>P</em> = 0.001) and after discharge within ∼3 months (222 vs 328 MMEs; <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and 3–6 months (245 vs 384 MMEs; <em>P</em> < 0.0001). The LB cohort had shorter mean length of stay (5.2 vs 5.7 days; <em>P</em> < 0.0001) and fewer inpatient readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; <em>P</em> < 0.0001), emergency department visits (OR, 0.78; <em>P</em> < 0.0001), and outpatient/office visits (OR, 0.91; <em>P</em> = 0.028) than the non-LB cohort 3 months after discharge. These data suggest use of LB in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery may reduce perioperative and postdischarge opioid use as well as HRU. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, this analysis provides valuable real-world data from large claims databases to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes that complement other types of retrospective and prospective studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 94-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000794/pdfft?md5=196ad89e9c104e6dec290b138248a975&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000794-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world assessment of longitudinal opioid use and healthcare resource utilization in patients undergoing colorectal resection
Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been used in multimodal pain management regimens to improve postsurgical analgesia. This retrospective cohort analysis assessed clinical and economic outcomes of LB vs non-LB analgesia in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery using real-world patient data from the IQVIA linkage claims databases. Patients who received LB were 1:1 matched to patients who did not receive LB (non-LB) via propensity scores. Outcomes included opioid use during the perioperative (2 weeks before surgery to 2 weeks after discharge), continued (>2 weeks to 3 months after discharge), and persistent (>3 months to 6 months after discharge) periods and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) during the first 3 months after discharge. Mean opioid consumption was lower in the LB (n = 4397) versus non-LB (n = 4397) cohort perioperatively (483 vs 538 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]; P = 0.001) and after discharge within ∼3 months (222 vs 328 MMEs; P < 0.0001) and 3–6 months (245 vs 384 MMEs; P < 0.0001). The LB cohort had shorter mean length of stay (5.2 vs 5.7 days; P < 0.0001) and fewer inpatient readmissions (odds ratio [OR], 0.71; P < 0.0001), emergency department visits (OR, 0.78; P < 0.0001), and outpatient/office visits (OR, 0.91; P = 0.028) than the non-LB cohort 3 months after discharge. These data suggest use of LB in minimally invasive colorectal resection surgery may reduce perioperative and postdischarge opioid use as well as HRU. Although additional studies are needed to confirm these findings, this analysis provides valuable real-world data from large claims databases to evaluate clinical and economic outcomes that complement other types of retrospective and prospective studies.