澳大利亚被诊断患有卵巢癌的人对基因检测、家族史的影响以及获得临床试验机会的自我报告意识

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Gynecologic Oncology Reports Pub Date : 2024-06-07 DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2024.101427
Deborah Roczo , Vanessa Alford , Alison Trainer , Anna DeFazio , Amy Pearn , Caitlin Delaney , Megan Cotter , Sue Hegarty
{"title":"澳大利亚被诊断患有卵巢癌的人对基因检测、家族史的影响以及获得临床试验机会的自我报告意识","authors":"Deborah Roczo ,&nbsp;Vanessa Alford ,&nbsp;Alison Trainer ,&nbsp;Anna DeFazio ,&nbsp;Amy Pearn ,&nbsp;Caitlin Delaney ,&nbsp;Megan Cotter ,&nbsp;Sue Hegarty","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the understanding of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing; to understand knowledge gaps among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that may impact best practice care; and to monitor overall changes in understanding from 2015 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal ’opt-in’ study using an online survey tool at three timepoints: 2015, 2018 and 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>People in Australia (or their families / caregivers) diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Self-reported awareness of heritable risk factors for ovarian cancer, genetic testing approaches and participation in clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study indicated that there have been improvements in the understanding and awareness of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding familial risk (an increase from 43.6% (45 of 149) in 2015 to 62.9% (166 of 264) in 2022); but people were less likely to be aware of the difference between somatic (tumour) and germline testing (120 of 266, 45.1%). However, there were self-reported improvements to clinical trial access in non-metropolitan areas (12 of 64, 18.8% in 2022 compared to 22 of 145, 15.2% in 2018), bringing it on par with metropolitan areas (32 of 169, 18.9% in 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite improved awareness about genetic testing among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer, there remain knowledge gaps in understanding of genetic testing types (germline and somatic) and gene variant targeted therapies; and further work to improve clinical trial awareness and access is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061/pdfft?md5=1cb37abdd636a40d68103691ea733050&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001061-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reported awareness of genetic testing, the impact of family history, and access to clinical trials for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Roczo ,&nbsp;Vanessa Alford ,&nbsp;Alison Trainer ,&nbsp;Anna DeFazio ,&nbsp;Amy Pearn ,&nbsp;Caitlin Delaney ,&nbsp;Megan Cotter ,&nbsp;Sue Hegarty\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101427\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the understanding of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing; to understand knowledge gaps among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that may impact best practice care; and to monitor overall changes in understanding from 2015 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal ’opt-in’ study using an online survey tool at three timepoints: 2015, 2018 and 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>People in Australia (or their families / caregivers) diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Self-reported awareness of heritable risk factors for ovarian cancer, genetic testing approaches and participation in clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study indicated that there have been improvements in the understanding and awareness of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding familial risk (an increase from 43.6% (45 of 149) in 2015 to 62.9% (166 of 264) in 2022); but people were less likely to be aware of the difference between somatic (tumour) and germline testing (120 of 266, 45.1%). However, there were self-reported improvements to clinical trial access in non-metropolitan areas (12 of 64, 18.8% in 2022 compared to 22 of 145, 15.2% in 2018), bringing it on par with metropolitan areas (32 of 169, 18.9% in 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite improved awareness about genetic testing among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer, there remain knowledge gaps in understanding of genetic testing types (germline and somatic) and gene variant targeted therapies; and further work to improve clinical trial awareness and access is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061/pdfft?md5=1cb37abdd636a40d68103691ea733050&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001061-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic Oncology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标评估卵巢癌确诊患者对基因检测的了解程度;了解卵巢癌确诊患者中可能影响最佳护理实践的知识差距;监测从 2015 年到 2022 年了解程度的总体变化:主要结果指标自我报告对卵巢癌遗传风险因素、基因检测方法和参与临床试验的认识。结果研究表明,确诊为卵巢癌的患者对家族性风险的理解和认识有所提高(从2015年的43.6%(149人中的45人)提高到2022年的62.9%(264人中的166人));但人们不太可能意识到体细胞(肿瘤)检测和种系检测之间的区别(266人中的120人,45.1%)。尽管卵巢癌患者对基因检测的认识有所提高,但对基因检测类型(种系和体细胞)和基因变异靶向疗法的了解仍存在知识差距;需要进一步开展工作,提高临床试验的认识和获得性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-reported awareness of genetic testing, the impact of family history, and access to clinical trials for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Australia

Objectives

To assess the understanding of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing; to understand knowledge gaps among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that may impact best practice care; and to monitor overall changes in understanding from 2015 to 2022.

Design

Longitudinal ’opt-in’ study using an online survey tool at three timepoints: 2015, 2018 and 2022.

Participants

People in Australia (or their families / caregivers) diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2022).

Main outcome measures

Self-reported awareness of heritable risk factors for ovarian cancer, genetic testing approaches and participation in clinical trials.

Results

The study indicated that there have been improvements in the understanding and awareness of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding familial risk (an increase from 43.6% (45 of 149) in 2015 to 62.9% (166 of 264) in 2022); but people were less likely to be aware of the difference between somatic (tumour) and germline testing (120 of 266, 45.1%). However, there were self-reported improvements to clinical trial access in non-metropolitan areas (12 of 64, 18.8% in 2022 compared to 22 of 145, 15.2% in 2018), bringing it on par with metropolitan areas (32 of 169, 18.9% in 2022).

Conclusions

Despite improved awareness about genetic testing among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer, there remain knowledge gaps in understanding of genetic testing types (germline and somatic) and gene variant targeted therapies; and further work to improve clinical trial awareness and access is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gynecologic Oncology Reports
Gynecologic Oncology Reports OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
183
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Invasive acantholytic anaplastic extramammary Paget disease: A previously unreported neoplasm in the vulva and review of the literature Ovotesticular Disorders of sexual development (DSD): A rare case of peritoneal carcinomatosis in an elderly DSD male patient Early-career and fellow gynecologic oncologists perceive underpreparedness for the business of medicine: A Society of gynecologic oncology survey study Exploring social determinants of health on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy severity in ovarian cancer: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1