NewsSlant:从道德视角分析政治新闻及其影响

IF 4.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1109/TCSS.2023.3341910
Amanul Haque;Munindar P. Singh
{"title":"NewsSlant:从道德视角分析政治新闻及其影响","authors":"Amanul Haque;Munindar P. Singh","doi":"10.1109/TCSS.2023.3341910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political news is often slanted toward its publisher's ideology and seeks to influence readers by focusing on selected aspects of contentious social and political issues. We investigate political slants in news and their influence on readers by analyzing election-related news and readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter. To this end, we collected election-related news from six major U.S. news publishers who covered the 2020 U.S. presidential election. We computed each publisher's political slant based on the favorability of its news toward the two major parties’ presidential candidates. We find that the election-related news coverage shows signs of political slant both in news headlines and on Twitter. The difference in news coverage of the two candidates between the left-leaning (\n<sc>LEFT</small>\n) and right-leaning (\n<sc>RIGHT</small>\n) news publishers is statistically significant. The effect size is larger for the news on Twitter than for headlines. And, news on Twitter expresses stronger sentiments than the headlines. We identify moral foundations in readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter based on the moral foundation theory. Moral foundations in readers’ reactions to \n<sc>LEFT</small>\n and \n<sc>RIGHT</small>\n differ statistically significantly, though the effects are small. Further, these shifts in moral foundations differ across social and political issues. User engagement on Twitter is higher for \n<sc>RIGHT</small>\n than for \n<sc>LEFT</small>\n. We posit that an improved understanding of slant and influence can enable better ways to combat online political polarization.","PeriodicalId":13044,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NewsSlant: Analyzing Political News and Its Influence Through a Moral Lens\",\"authors\":\"Amanul Haque;Munindar P. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TCSS.2023.3341910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political news is often slanted toward its publisher's ideology and seeks to influence readers by focusing on selected aspects of contentious social and political issues. We investigate political slants in news and their influence on readers by analyzing election-related news and readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter. To this end, we collected election-related news from six major U.S. news publishers who covered the 2020 U.S. presidential election. We computed each publisher's political slant based on the favorability of its news toward the two major parties’ presidential candidates. We find that the election-related news coverage shows signs of political slant both in news headlines and on Twitter. The difference in news coverage of the two candidates between the left-leaning (\\n<sc>LEFT</small>\\n) and right-leaning (\\n<sc>RIGHT</small>\\n) news publishers is statistically significant. The effect size is larger for the news on Twitter than for headlines. And, news on Twitter expresses stronger sentiments than the headlines. We identify moral foundations in readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter based on the moral foundation theory. Moral foundations in readers’ reactions to \\n<sc>LEFT</small>\\n and \\n<sc>RIGHT</small>\\n differ statistically significantly, though the effects are small. Further, these shifts in moral foundations differ across social and political issues. User engagement on Twitter is higher for \\n<sc>RIGHT</small>\\n than for \\n<sc>LEFT</small>\\n. We posit that an improved understanding of slant and influence can enable better ways to combat online political polarization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10379491/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10379491/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政治新闻往往倾向于其出版商的意识形态,并试图通过关注有争议的社会和政治问题的某些方面来影响读者。我们通过分析大选相关新闻和读者在 Twitter 上对新闻的反应,研究新闻中的政治倾向及其对读者的影响。为此,我们从报道 2020 年美国总统大选的六家美国主要新闻出版商处收集了与大选相关的新闻。我们根据新闻对两大党总统候选人的好感度来计算每家出版商的政治倾向。我们发现,与大选相关的新闻报道在新闻标题和推特上都显示出政治倾向的迹象。左倾(LEFT)和右倾(RIGHT)新闻出版商对两位候选人的新闻报道差异在统计上是显著的。推特上的新闻比头条新闻的影响更大。而且,Twitter 上的新闻比头条新闻表达了更强烈的情感。基于道德基础理论,我们确定了读者对 Twitter 上新闻反应的道德基础。读者对 "左 "和 "右 "的反应中的道德基础在统计上有显著差异,尽管影响很小。此外,这些道德基础的转变在不同的社会和政治问题上也有所不同。在 Twitter 上,RIGHT 的用户参与度高于 LEFT。我们认为,提高对倾斜度和影响力的理解可以更好地消除网络政治两极分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NewsSlant: Analyzing Political News and Its Influence Through a Moral Lens
Political news is often slanted toward its publisher's ideology and seeks to influence readers by focusing on selected aspects of contentious social and political issues. We investigate political slants in news and their influence on readers by analyzing election-related news and readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter. To this end, we collected election-related news from six major U.S. news publishers who covered the 2020 U.S. presidential election. We computed each publisher's political slant based on the favorability of its news toward the two major parties’ presidential candidates. We find that the election-related news coverage shows signs of political slant both in news headlines and on Twitter. The difference in news coverage of the two candidates between the left-leaning ( LEFT ) and right-leaning ( RIGHT ) news publishers is statistically significant. The effect size is larger for the news on Twitter than for headlines. And, news on Twitter expresses stronger sentiments than the headlines. We identify moral foundations in readers’ reactions to the news on Twitter based on the moral foundation theory. Moral foundations in readers’ reactions to LEFT and RIGHT differ statistically significantly, though the effects are small. Further, these shifts in moral foundations differ across social and political issues. User engagement on Twitter is higher for RIGHT than for LEFT . We posit that an improved understanding of slant and influence can enable better ways to combat online political polarization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems focuses on such topics as modeling, simulation, analysis and understanding of social systems from the quantitative and/or computational perspective. "Systems" include man-man, man-machine and machine-machine organizations and adversarial situations as well as social media structures and their dynamics. More specifically, the proposed transactions publishes articles on modeling the dynamics of social systems, methodologies for incorporating and representing socio-cultural and behavioral aspects in computational modeling, analysis of social system behavior and structure, and paradigms for social systems modeling and simulation. The journal also features articles on social network dynamics, social intelligence and cognition, social systems design and architectures, socio-cultural modeling and representation, and computational behavior modeling, and their applications.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Guest Editorial: Special Issue on Dark Side of the Socio-Cyber World: Media Manipulation, Fake News, and Misinformation IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Publication Information IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Information for Authors IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1