{"title":"孟加拉国部分药用植物提取物对食源性细菌病原体的抗菌功效","authors":"Alokesh Kumar Ghosh, Pieter Dewaele, Haibo Hu, Sujogya Kumar Panda, Walter Luyten","doi":"10.1111/jfs.13147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We assessed the antimicrobial activity of extracts prepared with four solvents (hexane, acetone, ethanol, water) from 45 medicinal plants used in Bangladesh. Food pathogenic bacteria (Gram-positive: <i>Bacillus cereus</i>, <i>Listeria innocua</i>, <i>Streptococcus faecalis</i>, and Gram-negative: <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Shigella sonnei</i>) were tested using a broth microdilution method. The extraction yield was highest (26%) for the water extract of <i>Carica papaya</i> and lowest (0.4%) for the acetone extract of <i>Cynodon dactylon</i>. In general, acetone extracts exhibited much more antibacterial activity than those obtained with the other three solvents (hexane, ethanol, and water). Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive than Gram-negatives. <i>Streptococcus faecalis</i> was the most susceptible to inhibition by examined extracts, whereas <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were the most resistant. Most inhibitory concentration-50 (IC<sub>50</sub>) values ranged between 101 and 500 μg/mL (64 extracts, 35.5%), followed by the range of 501–1000 μg/mL (40 extracts, 22.2%). Based on IC<sub>50</sub>, the most effective plants were three species of <i>Piper</i> (<i>Piper nigrum</i>, <i>Piper betle</i>, and <i>Piper chaba</i>), followed by <i>Nigella sativa</i>, <i>Psidium guajava</i>, <i>Syzygium cumini</i>, <i>C. dactylon</i>, and <i>Phyllanthus emblica.</i> In addition, the toxicity of chosen extracts against normal and malignant cell lines was tested; the most effective extracts were toxic against the human lung carcinoma cell line A549, but less toxic against the human Caucasian foetal lung cell line WI26VA4. These findings suggest that some plant extracts could be employed to treat food-borne bacterial infections, or as herbal preservatives in the food sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"44 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial efficacy of select medicinal plant extracts from Bangladesh against food-borne bacterial pathogens\",\"authors\":\"Alokesh Kumar Ghosh, Pieter Dewaele, Haibo Hu, Sujogya Kumar Panda, Walter Luyten\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfs.13147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We assessed the antimicrobial activity of extracts prepared with four solvents (hexane, acetone, ethanol, water) from 45 medicinal plants used in Bangladesh. Food pathogenic bacteria (Gram-positive: <i>Bacillus cereus</i>, <i>Listeria innocua</i>, <i>Streptococcus faecalis</i>, and Gram-negative: <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>, <i>Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Shigella sonnei</i>) were tested using a broth microdilution method. The extraction yield was highest (26%) for the water extract of <i>Carica papaya</i> and lowest (0.4%) for the acetone extract of <i>Cynodon dactylon</i>. In general, acetone extracts exhibited much more antibacterial activity than those obtained with the other three solvents (hexane, ethanol, and water). Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive than Gram-negatives. <i>Streptococcus faecalis</i> was the most susceptible to inhibition by examined extracts, whereas <i>E. coli</i> and <i>P. aeruginosa</i> were the most resistant. Most inhibitory concentration-50 (IC<sub>50</sub>) values ranged between 101 and 500 μg/mL (64 extracts, 35.5%), followed by the range of 501–1000 μg/mL (40 extracts, 22.2%). Based on IC<sub>50</sub>, the most effective plants were three species of <i>Piper</i> (<i>Piper nigrum</i>, <i>Piper betle</i>, and <i>Piper chaba</i>), followed by <i>Nigella sativa</i>, <i>Psidium guajava</i>, <i>Syzygium cumini</i>, <i>C. dactylon</i>, and <i>Phyllanthus emblica.</i> In addition, the toxicity of chosen extracts against normal and malignant cell lines was tested; the most effective extracts were toxic against the human lung carcinoma cell line A549, but less toxic against the human Caucasian foetal lung cell line WI26VA4. These findings suggest that some plant extracts could be employed to treat food-borne bacterial infections, or as herbal preservatives in the food sector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"44 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13147\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.13147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Antimicrobial efficacy of select medicinal plant extracts from Bangladesh against food-borne bacterial pathogens
We assessed the antimicrobial activity of extracts prepared with four solvents (hexane, acetone, ethanol, water) from 45 medicinal plants used in Bangladesh. Food pathogenic bacteria (Gram-positive: Bacillus cereus, Listeria innocua, Streptococcus faecalis, and Gram-negative: Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella enterica, and Shigella sonnei) were tested using a broth microdilution method. The extraction yield was highest (26%) for the water extract of Carica papaya and lowest (0.4%) for the acetone extract of Cynodon dactylon. In general, acetone extracts exhibited much more antibacterial activity than those obtained with the other three solvents (hexane, ethanol, and water). Gram-positive bacteria were more sensitive than Gram-negatives. Streptococcus faecalis was the most susceptible to inhibition by examined extracts, whereas E. coli and P. aeruginosa were the most resistant. Most inhibitory concentration-50 (IC50) values ranged between 101 and 500 μg/mL (64 extracts, 35.5%), followed by the range of 501–1000 μg/mL (40 extracts, 22.2%). Based on IC50, the most effective plants were three species of Piper (Piper nigrum, Piper betle, and Piper chaba), followed by Nigella sativa, Psidium guajava, Syzygium cumini, C. dactylon, and Phyllanthus emblica. In addition, the toxicity of chosen extracts against normal and malignant cell lines was tested; the most effective extracts were toxic against the human lung carcinoma cell line A549, but less toxic against the human Caucasian foetal lung cell line WI26VA4. These findings suggest that some plant extracts could be employed to treat food-borne bacterial infections, or as herbal preservatives in the food sector.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.