密歇根男性糖尿病项目随机临床对照试验:针对 2 型糖尿病黑人男性患者的同伴指导型糖尿病自我管理和支持干预试点/可行性研究》。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American Journal of Men's Health Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1177/15579883241258318
Alana M Ewen, Jaclynn M Hawkins, Katherine A Kloss, Robin Nwankwo, Martha M Funnell, Srijani Sengupta, Nelson Jean Francois, Gretchen Piatt
{"title":"密歇根男性糖尿病项目随机临床对照试验:针对 2 型糖尿病黑人男性患者的同伴指导型糖尿病自我管理和支持干预试点/可行性研究》。","authors":"Alana M Ewen, Jaclynn M Hawkins, Katherine A Kloss, Robin Nwankwo, Martha M Funnell, Srijani Sengupta, Nelson Jean Francois, Gretchen Piatt","doi":"10.1177/15579883241258318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (<i>n</i>=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (<i>n</i>=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (<i>n</i> = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (<i>p</i> = .52, <i>SD</i> = 0.99) and 0.13% (<i>p</i> = .68), respectively. General diet (<i>p</i> = .03, <i>M</i> change: 1.32, <i>SD</i> = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (<i>p</i> < .05, <i>M</i> change: 0.50, <i>SD</i> = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, <i>p</i> = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (<i>n</i> = 7), >50%, (<i>p</i> = .003, <i>M</i> change: -5.71, <i>SD</i> = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7429,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Men's Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"15579883241258318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181889/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Alana M Ewen, Jaclynn M Hawkins, Katherine A Kloss, Robin Nwankwo, Martha M Funnell, Srijani Sengupta, Nelson Jean Francois, Gretchen Piatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15579883241258318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (<i>n</i>=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (<i>n</i>=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (<i>n</i> = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (<i>p</i> = .52, <i>SD</i> = 0.99) and 0.13% (<i>p</i> = .68), respectively. General diet (<i>p</i> = .03, <i>M</i> change: 1.32, <i>SD</i> = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (<i>p</i> < .05, <i>M</i> change: 0.50, <i>SD</i> = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, <i>p</i> = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (<i>n</i> = 7), >50%, (<i>p</i> = .003, <i>M</i> change: -5.71, <i>SD</i> = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Men's Health\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"15579883241258318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181889/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Men's Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241258318\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Men's Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15579883241258318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与非西班牙裔白人男性相比,黑人男性受 2 型糖尿病(T2D)的影响尤为严重,且糖尿病相关并发症的发生率更高。为了解决黑人男性在糖尿病自我管理方面遇到的复杂障碍,我们在底特律大都会区实施了一项为期 3 个月的同伴引导和赋权型糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)和支持(DSMS)干预措施。25名年龄≥55岁、自述患有T2D的黑人男性被随机分配到干预组(12人)--10小时的DSME和9小时的DSMS--或增强型常规护理(EUC)组(13人)--10小时的DSME。同伴领导者(n = 3)接受了糖尿病护理和教育专家(CDCES)的培训,共同主持支持会议。结果(血红蛋白 A1c [HbA1c]、糖尿病自我护理活动和糖尿病困扰)在干预前和干预后进行评估。干预组和 EUC 组的平均 HbA1c 分别下降了 0.20% (p = .52, SD = 0.99) 和 0.13% (p = .68)。干预组的一般饮食(p = .03,M 变化:1.32,SD = 1.71)和血糖监测(p < .05,M 变化:0.50,SD = 0.74)得分有所提高。EUC组的一般饮食评分也有所提高:平均变化:1.77,P = .081.77, p = .08,但变化不具有统计学意义。糖尿病困扰得分的变化因参加疗程的次数而异,参加 7 至 12 次疗程(n = 7)的人的糖尿病困扰得分显著下降,降幅大于 50%,(p = .003,平均变化:-5.71,标准差 = 3.20)。针对黑人男性实施同伴主导的DSMS计划是可行的,也得到了采纳,并带来了积极的结果变化。有必要扩大干预规模并评估其可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Michigan Men's Diabetes Project Randomized Clinical Control Trial: A Pilot/Feasibility Study of a Peer-Led Diabetes Self-Management and Support Intervention for Black Men With Type 2 Diabetes.

Black men are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes (T2D) and experience higher diabetes-related complications than non-Hispanic White men. To address the complex barriers in diabetes self-management for Black men, we implemented a 3-month peer-led and empowerment-based Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) and Support (DSMS) intervention in Metro Detroit. Twenty-five Black men ≥55 years of age with self-reported T2D were randomized to the intervention group (n=12)-10 hr of DSME and 9 hr of DSMS-or enhanced usual care (EUC) group (n=13)-10 hr of DSME. Peer leaders (n = 3) were trained by certified diabetes care and education specialists (CDCESs) to cofacilitate the support sessions. Outcomes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], diabetes self-care activities, and diabetes distress) were assessed preintervention and postintervention. In the intervention and EUC groups, mean HbA1c decreased by 0.20% (p = .52, SD = 0.99) and 0.13% (p = .68), respectively. General diet (p = .03, M change: 1.32, SD = 1.71) and blood glucose monitoring (p < .05, M change: 0.50, SD = 0.74) scores improved among those in the intervention group. General diet scores also improved in the EUC group: mean change: 1.77, p = .08, although changes were not statistically significant. Changes in diabetes distress scores differed based on the number of sessions attended, with a significant decrease in those attending 7 to 12 sessions (n = 7), >50%, (p = .003, M change: -5.71, SD = 3.20). Implementing a peer-led DSMS program for Black men was feasible, adopted, and led to positive changes in outcomes. Scaling up the intervention and assessing sustainability is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Men's Health
American Journal of Men's Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Men"s Health will be a core resource for cutting-edge information regarding men"s health and illness. The Journal will publish papers from all health, behavioral and social disciplines, including but not limited to medicine, nursing, allied health, public health, health psychology/behavioral medicine, and medical sociology and anthropology.
期刊最新文献
Two-Spirit, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (2SGBTQ) men's suicidality in Canada: A Scoping Review. A Qualitative Exploration of Factors Influencing Prostate Cancer Adjustment Among Older Adults: A Social Ecological Model. First-Time Father's Risk Factors of Paternal Perinatal Psychological Distress: A Scoping Review. Identification of Systemic Drug Targets for Anti-cavernous Fibrosis in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction, Guided by Genome-Wide Mendelian Randomization. "Just Treat Me Delicately": A Qualitative Exploration of What Works to Engage Australian Men in Health Care Encounters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1