脊髓吗啡与腹横肌平面阻滞对剖腹产后阿片类药物需求的影响比较:一项观察性研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S459530
Suwarman, Osmond Muftilov Pison, Mohammad Fikry Maulana, Prapanca Nugraha
{"title":"脊髓吗啡与腹横肌平面阻滞对剖腹产后阿片类药物需求的影响比较:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Suwarman, Osmond Muftilov Pison, Mohammad Fikry Maulana, Prapanca Nugraha","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S459530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired <i>t</i>-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Suwarman, Osmond Muftilov Pison, Mohammad Fikry Maulana, Prapanca Nugraha\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S459530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired <i>t</i>-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11180432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S459530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S459530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性术后疼痛是剖腹产患者的主要临床问题之一,发生率高达 89.8%。术后疼痛会给产妇带来不适和各种并发症。此外,术后疼痛如果处理不当,变成慢性疼痛的风险会增加 2.5 倍。增强剖腹产术后恢复(ERACS)方案中推荐的预防术后急性疼痛的方法之一是使用鞘内长效阿片类药物,其中鞘内吗啡是金标准,另外还有腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞。本研究旨在评估剖宫产手术患者在使用 0.1 毫克脊髓吗啡和使用 0.2% 10 毫克布比卡因进行 TAP 阻滞时阿片类药物镇痛需求的比较:本研究是在印度尼西亚西爪哇的一家三级甲等医院进行的观察性研究。患者接受患者自控麻醉(PCA),并使用芬太尼镇痛。数字数据的统计分析采用非配对 t 检验,分类数据采用 Chi-Square 检验:结果:与 TAP 阻滞组相比,给予脊髓吗啡组的额外阿片类药物持续时间更长(P < 0.05),额外阿片类药物的总剂量更少(P < 0.05):结论:与TAP阻滞相比,脊髓吗啡所需的额外阿片类药物更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study.

Objective: Acute postoperative pain is one of the major clinical problems that occurs in patients undergoing cesarean section with a prevalence of 89.8%. Postoperative pain causes discomfort and various complications for the mother. In addition, postoperative pain that is not handled properly can increase the risk of becoming chronic pain by 2.5 times. One of the methods recommended in the Enhanced Recovery After Caesarean Section (ERACS) protocol to prevent acute postoperative pain is the use of intrathecal long-acting opioids, with intrathecal morphine as the gold standard and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block. This study aims to assess the comparison of opioid needs as analgesic rescue between the administration of 0.1mg spinal morphine and TAP block with bupivacaine 0.2% 10mg in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: This study is an observational study in a single Tertiary Hospital in West Java - Indonesia. Patients were given patient-controlled anesthesia (PCA) with fentanyl as analgesic rescue. Statistical analysis of the numerical data used the unpaired t-test and Chi-Square test for categorical data.

Results: In the group that was given spinal morphine, the duration of additional opioids was longer (p < 0.05), and the total dose of additional opioids was less than the TAP block group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The spinal morphine requires fewer additional opioids than the TAP block.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foot Drop Following a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block with Ropivacaine, A Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study. Current Status and Global Trend of Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital. Combined Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca, Sciatic Nerve, and Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Blocks in Austere Settings for Hemodynamically Unstable Patients with Vascular Injuries from Weapon Wounds: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1