戒烟对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后左心室射血分数的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS ARYA Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.48305/ARYA.2022.11895.2734
Parisa Janjani, Javad Azimivaghar, Nahid Salehi, Reza Haidari Moghadam, Mohammad Shakiba, Soraya Siabani, Hassan Azarpara, Mina Tahmasebi, Mohammad Rouzbahani
{"title":"戒烟对急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死后左心室射血分数的影响","authors":"Parisa Janjani, Javad Azimivaghar, Nahid Salehi, Reza Haidari Moghadam, Mohammad Shakiba, Soraya Siabani, Hassan Azarpara, Mina Tahmasebi, Mohammad Rouzbahani","doi":"10.48305/ARYA.2022.11895.2734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of global mortality. Moreover, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is the most important predictor of post-AMI mortality. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between smoking cessation and LVEF following one year from the STEMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study was a part of the Kermanshah STEMI Registry and included 825 smokers admitted to Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran, with AMI during a 2-year study period. Data collection was performed using the standardized case report form by the European Observational Registry Program (EORP). Moreover, multiple logistic regression was used to compare LVEF between the patients who had quit smoking post-AMI and those who were still smokers after one year. Also, one-to-one Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to reduce the assessment error and selection bias, increase the result accuracy, and minimize the effects of confounders on the LVEF-smoking relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following one year after AMI, 219 (26.55%) patients had quit smoking, while 606 (73.45%) still smoked. Using the PSM, a total of 168 ex-smokers were matched to 168 current smokers. Moreover, it was shown that LVEF was higher in current smokers compared to ex-smokers. However, the difference was not significant. Also, multiple logistic regression showed that the Odds Ratio (OR) of LVEF reduction was insignificantly higher in ex-smokers (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.98-1.29) compared to current smokers. Multivariate regression analysis found similar results even after the application of PSM (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the low rate of smoking cessation after MI, physicians are recommended to ask about the smoking status of MI patients at each office visit or re-admission and strongly recommend quitting smoking.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"19 2","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11066777/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Smoking Cessation on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Janjani, Javad Azimivaghar, Nahid Salehi, Reza Haidari Moghadam, Mohammad Shakiba, Soraya Siabani, Hassan Azarpara, Mina Tahmasebi, Mohammad Rouzbahani\",\"doi\":\"10.48305/ARYA.2022.11895.2734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of global mortality. Moreover, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is the most important predictor of post-AMI mortality. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between smoking cessation and LVEF following one year from the STEMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The present study was a part of the Kermanshah STEMI Registry and included 825 smokers admitted to Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran, with AMI during a 2-year study period. Data collection was performed using the standardized case report form by the European Observational Registry Program (EORP). Moreover, multiple logistic regression was used to compare LVEF between the patients who had quit smoking post-AMI and those who were still smokers after one year. Also, one-to-one Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to reduce the assessment error and selection bias, increase the result accuracy, and minimize the effects of confounders on the LVEF-smoking relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following one year after AMI, 219 (26.55%) patients had quit smoking, while 606 (73.45%) still smoked. Using the PSM, a total of 168 ex-smokers were matched to 168 current smokers. Moreover, it was shown that LVEF was higher in current smokers compared to ex-smokers. However, the difference was not significant. Also, multiple logistic regression showed that the Odds Ratio (OR) of LVEF reduction was insignificantly higher in ex-smokers (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.98-1.29) compared to current smokers. Multivariate regression analysis found similar results even after the application of PSM (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the low rate of smoking cessation after MI, physicians are recommended to ask about the smoking status of MI patients at each office visit or re-admission and strongly recommend quitting smoking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARYA Atherosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"19 2\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11066777/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARYA Atherosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48305/ARYA.2022.11895.2734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/ARYA.2022.11895.2734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性心肌梗死(AMI急性心肌梗死(AMI)是导致全球死亡的主要原因。此外,左心室射血分数(LVEF)是预测急性心肌梗死后死亡率的最重要指标。因此,本研究旨在调查 STEMI 一年后戒烟与 LVEF 之间的关系:本研究是克尔曼沙赫 STEMI 登记的一部分,纳入了伊朗克尔曼沙赫伊玛目阿里医院在两年研究期间收治的 825 名急性心肌梗死吸烟者。数据收集采用欧洲观察登记计划(EORP)的标准化病例报告表。此外,研究人员还使用多元逻辑回归对急性心肌梗死后戒烟的患者和一年后仍吸烟的患者的 LVEF 进行了比较。同时,为了减少评估误差和选择偏差,提高结果的准确性,并最大限度地减少混杂因素对 LVEF 与吸烟关系的影响,采用了一对一倾向得分匹配法(PSM):急性心肌梗死一年后,219 名患者(26.55%)已戒烟,606 名患者(73.45%)仍在吸烟。通过 PSM,共有 168 名戒烟者与 168 名当前吸烟者进行了配对。结果显示,与戒烟者相比,吸烟者的 LVEF 更高。然而,差异并不显著。此外,多元逻辑回归显示,与当前吸烟者相比,戒烟者 LVEF 降低的概率比(OR)并不显著(OR=1.13;95% CI:0.98-1.29)。多变量回归分析发现,即使在应用 PSM 后,结果也相似(OR=1.02;95% CI:0.82-1.22):鉴于心肌梗死后的戒烟率较低,建议医生在每次就诊或再次入院时询问心肌梗死患者的吸烟情况,并强烈建议患者戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Smoking Cessation on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) is the leading cause of global mortality. Moreover, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is the most important predictor of post-AMI mortality. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between smoking cessation and LVEF following one year from the STEMI.

Method: The present study was a part of the Kermanshah STEMI Registry and included 825 smokers admitted to Imam Ali Hospital, Kermanshah, Iran, with AMI during a 2-year study period. Data collection was performed using the standardized case report form by the European Observational Registry Program (EORP). Moreover, multiple logistic regression was used to compare LVEF between the patients who had quit smoking post-AMI and those who were still smokers after one year. Also, one-to-one Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to reduce the assessment error and selection bias, increase the result accuracy, and minimize the effects of confounders on the LVEF-smoking relationship.

Results: Following one year after AMI, 219 (26.55%) patients had quit smoking, while 606 (73.45%) still smoked. Using the PSM, a total of 168 ex-smokers were matched to 168 current smokers. Moreover, it was shown that LVEF was higher in current smokers compared to ex-smokers. However, the difference was not significant. Also, multiple logistic regression showed that the Odds Ratio (OR) of LVEF reduction was insignificantly higher in ex-smokers (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.98-1.29) compared to current smokers. Multivariate regression analysis found similar results even after the application of PSM (OR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.22).

Conclusions: Given the low rate of smoking cessation after MI, physicians are recommended to ask about the smoking status of MI patients at each office visit or re-admission and strongly recommend quitting smoking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARYA Atherosclerosis
ARYA Atherosclerosis CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cardiomyopathy discovered during pregnancy: Insights from speckle tracking echocardiography in a cohort of pregnant patients. Cardioprotective effects of aerobic training in diabetic rats: Reducing cardiac apoptotic indices and oxidative stress for a healthier heart. Effects of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty on longitudinal changes in right ventricular strain and strain rate in pediatric pulmonary stenosis. Forty-seven years of Iranian cardiovascular disease scientific publication: A bibliometric and altmetric analysis. The assessment of no-reflow phenomenon incidence in early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention following a primary fibrinolysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1