{"title":"一个多世纪以来,人类死亡的宽限期一直在下降。","authors":"Stefano Giaimo","doi":"10.1002/ajhb.24117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Human mortality is U-shaped and, therefore, defines an age <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> separating lives with an overall negative net change in mortality from lives with an overall positive net change in mortality. How has age <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> changed, also relatively to life expectancy, over recent human history? And how does <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> compare between humans and other primates, the mortality of which is also U-shaped?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Modeling data from the Human Mortality Database, the historical change of <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> in advanced economies is reported and compared with that of primates in wild and captive conditions the demography of which was already modeled in the literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In humans, a marked decline in <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math> for both sexes, also relatively to their life expectancy, is associated with medical and economic progress. Comparing wild with captive conditions in nonhuman primates, magnitude, and direction of the change in <span></span><math>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>x</mi>\n <mo>*</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow></math>, both relatively to life expectancy and absolutely, can depend on genus and sex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>With medical and economic progress, human lives have transitioned from a negative to a positive net change in mortality independently of sex. There is no evidence of an analogous transition occurring in other primates when their environment is made more benign.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50809,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Human Biology","volume":"36 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajhb.24117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grace period of human mortality has declined for over a century\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Giaimo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajhb.24117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Human mortality is U-shaped and, therefore, defines an age <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math> separating lives with an overall negative net change in mortality from lives with an overall positive net change in mortality. How has age <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math> changed, also relatively to life expectancy, over recent human history? And how does <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math> compare between humans and other primates, the mortality of which is also U-shaped?</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Modeling data from the Human Mortality Database, the historical change of <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math> in advanced economies is reported and compared with that of primates in wild and captive conditions the demography of which was already modeled in the literature.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In humans, a marked decline in <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math> for both sexes, also relatively to their life expectancy, is associated with medical and economic progress. Comparing wild with captive conditions in nonhuman primates, magnitude, and direction of the change in <span></span><math>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>x</mi>\\n <mo>*</mo>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow></math>, both relatively to life expectancy and absolutely, can depend on genus and sex.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>With medical and economic progress, human lives have transitioned from a negative to a positive net change in mortality independently of sex. There is no evidence of an analogous transition occurring in other primates when their environment is made more benign.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajhb.24117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.24117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajhb.24117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:人类死亡率呈 U 型,因此,定义了一个年龄 x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ ,将总体死亡率净变化为负值的生命与总体死亡率净变化为正值的生命区分开来。$$ 将死亡率净变化总体为负数的生命与死亡率净变化总体为正数的生命区分开来。年龄 x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 是如何变化的?在人类近代史上,相对于预期寿命而言,年龄 x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 是如何变化的?在人类和其他灵长类动物之间,x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 又是如何变化的呢?人类与其他灵长类动物(其死亡率也呈 U 型)之间的比较如何?通过模拟人类死亡率数据库的数据,报告了发达经济体中 x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 的历史变化。$$ 报告了发达经济体中 x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 的历史变化,并将其与野生和圈养灵长类动物的变化进行了比较:结果:在人类中,x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 的显著下降。$$ 也相对于他们的预期寿命而言,与医疗和经济进步有关。比较非人灵长类动物的野生环境和圈养环境,x * $$ {x}^{\ast }$ 的变化幅度和方向,都与预期寿命有关。$$,无论是相对于预期寿命还是绝对值,都取决于属种和性别:结论:随着医学和经济的进步,人类的死亡率已从负的净变化过渡到正的净变化,而与性别无关。目前还没有证据表明,当其他灵长类动物所处的环境变得更加有利时,它们也会发生类似的转变。
Grace period of human mortality has declined for over a century
Objectives
Human mortality is U-shaped and, therefore, defines an age separating lives with an overall negative net change in mortality from lives with an overall positive net change in mortality. How has age changed, also relatively to life expectancy, over recent human history? And how does compare between humans and other primates, the mortality of which is also U-shaped?
Methods
Modeling data from the Human Mortality Database, the historical change of in advanced economies is reported and compared with that of primates in wild and captive conditions the demography of which was already modeled in the literature.
Results
In humans, a marked decline in for both sexes, also relatively to their life expectancy, is associated with medical and economic progress. Comparing wild with captive conditions in nonhuman primates, magnitude, and direction of the change in , both relatively to life expectancy and absolutely, can depend on genus and sex.
Conclusions
With medical and economic progress, human lives have transitioned from a negative to a positive net change in mortality independently of sex. There is no evidence of an analogous transition occurring in other primates when their environment is made more benign.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Human Biology is the Official Journal of the Human Biology Association.
The American Journal of Human Biology is a bimonthly, peer-reviewed, internationally circulated journal that publishes reports of original research, theoretical articles and timely reviews, and brief communications in the interdisciplinary field of human biology. As the official journal of the Human Biology Association, the Journal also publishes abstracts of research presented at its annual scientific meeting and book reviews relevant to the field.
The Journal seeks scholarly manuscripts that address all aspects of human biology, health, and disease, particularly those that stress comparative, developmental, ecological, or evolutionary perspectives. The transdisciplinary areas covered in the Journal include, but are not limited to, epidemiology, genetic variation, population biology and demography, physiology, anatomy, nutrition, growth and aging, physical performance, physical activity and fitness, ecology, and evolution, along with their interactions. The Journal publishes basic, applied, and methodologically oriented research from all areas, including measurement, analytical techniques and strategies, and computer applications in human biology.
Like many other biologically oriented disciplines, the field of human biology has undergone considerable growth and diversification in recent years, and the expansion of the aims and scope of the Journal is a reflection of this growth and membership diversification.
The Journal is committed to prompt review, and priority publication is given to manuscripts with novel or timely findings, and to manuscripts of unusual interest.