上颌和下颌牙龈生物型与临床牙冠和牙周参数的相关性。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Advances in Periodontics Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1002/cap.10302
Nidhi Pradeep Gadge, Ruhee Chawla, Sunil Ronad, Shreya Vikas Bhole, Pawan Kumar, Puttaraj Tukaram Kattimani
{"title":"上颌和下颌牙龈生物型与临床牙冠和牙周参数的相关性。","authors":"Nidhi Pradeep Gadge, Ruhee Chawla, Sunil Ronad, Shreya Vikas Bhole, Pawan Kumar, Puttaraj Tukaram Kattimani","doi":"10.1002/cap.10302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gingival biotype (GB) influences treatment planning and clinical outcomes in several dental specialties. This study aimed to investigate the associations between the GB and various clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as probing depth (PD), papillary height (PH), keratinized tissue width (KTW), crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), and gingival thickness (GT). The secondary objective was to evaluate the optimal cutoff values for all parameters to determine the GB in both the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 50 healthy individuals (26 men and 24 women) aged between 20 and 35 years. The GB was determined as a binary variable based on the transparency of a periodontal probe through the buccal gingival margin (TRAN). The clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as PH, PD, KTW, GT (free gingival thickness [FGT] and attached gingival thickness [AGT]), and the CW/CL ratio were measured. The associations between different variables were evaluated by the chi-square test. Correlations between various clinical parameters and GB were assessed using point-biserial correlation analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Youden index were used to calculate the optimal cutoff values for the PH, PD, KTW, FGT, AGT, and CW/CL ratio to discriminate GB. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the males was 28.23 ± 2.81 years, while that of the females was 27.08 ± 2.85 years. Thick GB was present in 56% of individuals, and thin GB was present in 44% of individuals. Compared with females, males had a predilection for thick GB compared with females. According to the ROC analysis, the cutoff values to discriminate GB for mandibular anterior teeth were 3.4 mm for PH, 1.96 mm for PD, 4.21 mm for KTW, 0.98 mm for FGT, 0.43 mm for AGT, and 0.91 for the CW/CL ratio. Similarly, the cutoff values for discriminating the GB for maxillary anterior teeth were 4.02 mm for PH, 1.92 mm for PD, 3.89 mm for KTW, 1.02 mm for FGT, 0.42 mm for AGT, and 0.83 for the CW/CL ratio. PH, PD, and FGT showed strong positive correlations with GB, whereas KTW, AGT, and the CW/CL ratio showed weak positive correlation with GB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, a significant association between all clinical crown and periodontal parameters with the GB has been confirmed. FGT for mandibular anterior teeth and PH for the mandibular anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurements to differentiate between thick and thin GB based on ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>All the clinical parameters such as papillary height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, and crown width/height ratio were significantly associated with gingival biotype. Free gingival thickness for mandibular anterior teeth and papillary height for the maxillary anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurement to differentiate between thick and thin gingival biotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlations of gingival biotype with clinical crown and periodontal parameters in maxillary and mandibular jaws.\",\"authors\":\"Nidhi Pradeep Gadge, Ruhee Chawla, Sunil Ronad, Shreya Vikas Bhole, Pawan Kumar, Puttaraj Tukaram Kattimani\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cap.10302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The gingival biotype (GB) influences treatment planning and clinical outcomes in several dental specialties. This study aimed to investigate the associations between the GB and various clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as probing depth (PD), papillary height (PH), keratinized tissue width (KTW), crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), and gingival thickness (GT). The secondary objective was to evaluate the optimal cutoff values for all parameters to determine the GB in both the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 50 healthy individuals (26 men and 24 women) aged between 20 and 35 years. The GB was determined as a binary variable based on the transparency of a periodontal probe through the buccal gingival margin (TRAN). The clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as PH, PD, KTW, GT (free gingival thickness [FGT] and attached gingival thickness [AGT]), and the CW/CL ratio were measured. The associations between different variables were evaluated by the chi-square test. Correlations between various clinical parameters and GB were assessed using point-biserial correlation analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Youden index were used to calculate the optimal cutoff values for the PH, PD, KTW, FGT, AGT, and CW/CL ratio to discriminate GB. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the males was 28.23 ± 2.81 years, while that of the females was 27.08 ± 2.85 years. Thick GB was present in 56% of individuals, and thin GB was present in 44% of individuals. Compared with females, males had a predilection for thick GB compared with females. According to the ROC analysis, the cutoff values to discriminate GB for mandibular anterior teeth were 3.4 mm for PH, 1.96 mm for PD, 4.21 mm for KTW, 0.98 mm for FGT, 0.43 mm for AGT, and 0.91 for the CW/CL ratio. Similarly, the cutoff values for discriminating the GB for maxillary anterior teeth were 4.02 mm for PH, 1.92 mm for PD, 3.89 mm for KTW, 1.02 mm for FGT, 0.42 mm for AGT, and 0.83 for the CW/CL ratio. PH, PD, and FGT showed strong positive correlations with GB, whereas KTW, AGT, and the CW/CL ratio showed weak positive correlation with GB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within the limitations of the present study, a significant association between all clinical crown and periodontal parameters with the GB has been confirmed. FGT for mandibular anterior teeth and PH for the mandibular anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurements to differentiate between thick and thin GB based on ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>All the clinical parameters such as papillary height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, and crown width/height ratio were significantly associated with gingival biotype. Free gingival thickness for mandibular anterior teeth and papillary height for the maxillary anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurement to differentiate between thick and thin gingival biotypes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Advances in Periodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙龈生物型(GB)会影响多个牙科专业的治疗计划和临床结果。本研究旨在调查 GB 与各种临床牙冠和牙周参数之间的关系,如探诊深度 (PD)、乳头高度 (PH)、角化组织宽度 (KTW)、牙冠宽度/牙冠长度比 (CW/CL) 和牙龈厚度 (GT)。次要目标是评估所有参数的最佳临界值,以确定上颌和下颌前牙的国标:这项横断面研究包括 50 名年龄在 20 到 35 岁之间的健康人(26 名男性和 24 名女性)。根据牙周探针穿过颊面龈缘(TRAN)的透明度,将国标确定为二元变量。测量了临床牙冠和牙周参数,如 PH、PD、KTW、GT(游离龈厚度 [FGT] 和附着龈厚度 [AGT])以及 CW/CL 比值。不同变量之间的相关性通过卡方检验进行评估。采用点-阶梯相关分析评估了各种临床参数与 GB 之间的相关性。接收者操作特征(ROC)分析和尤登指数用于计算 PH、PD、KTW、FGT、AGT 和 CW/CL 比值的最佳截断值,以区分 GB。统计显著性水平设定为 p 结果:男性的平均年龄为(28.23 ± 2.81)岁,女性的平均年龄为(27.08 ± 2.85)岁。56%的人存在粗大的腹股沟,44%的人存在较细的腹股沟。与女性相比,男性更倾向于厚型胃癌。根据 ROC 分析,鉴别下颌前牙 GB 的临界值为:PH 3.4 毫米、PD 1.96 毫米、KTW 4.21 毫米、FGT 0.98 毫米、AGT 0.43 毫米、CW/CL 比值 0.91。同样,上颌前牙 GB 的分辨临界值为:PH 4.02 mm,PD 1.92 mm,KTW 3.89 mm,FGT 1.02 mm,AGT 0.42 mm,CW/CL 比值 0.83。PH、PD 和 FGT 与 GB 呈强正相关,而 KTW、AGT 和 CW/CL 比值与 GB 呈弱正相关:结论:在本研究的限制条件下,所有临床牙冠和牙周参数与国标之间的显著相关性已得到证实。根据 ROC 分析,下颌前牙的 FGT 和下颌前牙的 PH 是区分厚和薄 GB 的最可靠测量指标:所有临床参数,如乳头高度、探诊深度、角化牙龈宽度、牙龈厚度和牙冠宽度/高度比均与牙龈生物型显著相关。下颌前牙的游离龈厚度和上颌前牙的乳头高度已成为区分厚龈和薄龈生物型的最可靠测量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlations of gingival biotype with clinical crown and periodontal parameters in maxillary and mandibular jaws.

Background: The gingival biotype (GB) influences treatment planning and clinical outcomes in several dental specialties. This study aimed to investigate the associations between the GB and various clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as probing depth (PD), papillary height (PH), keratinized tissue width (KTW), crown width/crown length ratio (CW/CL), and gingival thickness (GT). The secondary objective was to evaluate the optimal cutoff values for all parameters to determine the GB in both the maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 50 healthy individuals (26 men and 24 women) aged between 20 and 35 years. The GB was determined as a binary variable based on the transparency of a periodontal probe through the buccal gingival margin (TRAN). The clinical crown and periodontal parameters, such as PH, PD, KTW, GT (free gingival thickness [FGT] and attached gingival thickness [AGT]), and the CW/CL ratio were measured. The associations between different variables were evaluated by the chi-square test. Correlations between various clinical parameters and GB were assessed using point-biserial correlation analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the Youden index were used to calculate the optimal cutoff values for the PH, PD, KTW, FGT, AGT, and CW/CL ratio to discriminate GB. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results: The mean age of the males was 28.23 ± 2.81 years, while that of the females was 27.08 ± 2.85 years. Thick GB was present in 56% of individuals, and thin GB was present in 44% of individuals. Compared with females, males had a predilection for thick GB compared with females. According to the ROC analysis, the cutoff values to discriminate GB for mandibular anterior teeth were 3.4 mm for PH, 1.96 mm for PD, 4.21 mm for KTW, 0.98 mm for FGT, 0.43 mm for AGT, and 0.91 for the CW/CL ratio. Similarly, the cutoff values for discriminating the GB for maxillary anterior teeth were 4.02 mm for PH, 1.92 mm for PD, 3.89 mm for KTW, 1.02 mm for FGT, 0.42 mm for AGT, and 0.83 for the CW/CL ratio. PH, PD, and FGT showed strong positive correlations with GB, whereas KTW, AGT, and the CW/CL ratio showed weak positive correlation with GB.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, a significant association between all clinical crown and periodontal parameters with the GB has been confirmed. FGT for mandibular anterior teeth and PH for the mandibular anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurements to differentiate between thick and thin GB based on ROC analysis.

Key points: All the clinical parameters such as papillary height, probing depth, width of keratinized gingiva, gingival thickness, and crown width/height ratio were significantly associated with gingival biotype. Free gingival thickness for mandibular anterior teeth and papillary height for the maxillary anterior teeth have emerged as the most reliable measurement to differentiate between thick and thin gingival biotypes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Advanced platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft in maxillary gingival recession management. Proliferative verrucous leukoplakia: Case study of 24 years and outcome of treatment with CO2 laser. Targeted connective tissue resection with the dual-flap surgical approach in the treatment of drug-induced gingival enlargement: Case study. Digital and analog techniques for cemento-enamel junction reconstruction: A case study. Peripheral calcifying odontogenic cyst in maxillary anterior gingiva: A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1